Atlantis from a Geographer's Perspective [ILLUSTRATED] (Hardcover)

~ (Author), Wibjorn Karlen (Foreword) "A seemingly endless stream of announcements reaches us through the news, with claims that Atlantis has been found..." (more)
Key Phrases: concentric lakes, megalith culture, eastern passage, North Sea, Atlantic Ocean, Stone Age (more...)

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Finally a scientist from Sweden has pinpointed the exact location of the mythical island of Atlantis ... using classic scientific methodology." -- The Irish Eyes, Sept 2004

"…short but valuable... His case…is concise and convincing, and his style of presentation…makes it a pleasure to read." -- FATE, March 2005

Am I convinced that Ireland is the location for the Lost Continent? It's as good a hypothesis as any. -- Irish Emigrant, Feb. 2005

Product Description

A scholar who has dedicated much of his career to studying the geographical changes of northern Europe during the past 15,000 years suggests an explanation to the Atlantis enigma. The author discusses pre-historic geography, natural disasters, and touches upon stone age archaeology before he goes over to the greater issues: why and how myth is created, logic and science, and the rise and fall of civilizations - which of course is the very topic for which Plato introduced Atlantis in the literature. The book is written in a tone of a conversation with the reader.

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Hardcover: 112 pages
• Publisher: Lindorm Publishing (September 1, 2004)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0975594605
• ISBN-13: 978-0975594605
• Product Dimensions: 8.3 x 5.8 x 0.5 inches
• Shipping Weight: 11.2 ounces
• Average Customer Review: 3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #1,011,735 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars A well-researched investigation into our distant past., November 14, 2004

By	Eve V. Sapsford "Stargazer" (Huntington Beach, CA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

Ulf Erlingsson has written a book about Atlantis that is well thought out. I have read many books on this subject, and this is one of the best. His conclusions are reasonable and well documented, and provoke thought on the part of the reader about whether some of our preconceptions about our distant past serve us as our paradigm changes in the new century.

5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Made the myth very real to me, September 20, 2004

By	ibeo "ibeo" (Europe) - See all my reviews

Reading this book opened up a lot of doors to the past for me. A past just as complicated as our present maybe. It is easy to forget how long we humans have possessed the abilities of present mankind - our intelligence and inventiveness. This book made atleast me question how ancient societies really was formed and functioned, just by putting forward some facts and comparing them with old myths/tales. To me this is a sensible book not leaping off into fantasy, but at the same time it does evoke my fantasy and imagination.

6 of 8 people found the following review helpful:

1.0 out of 5 stars A theory that doesn't hold up, August 24, 2005

By	S. Johnston (Bowie, MD) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

As an archaeologist who works in Ireland, I was interested to read this book. I was dismayed to see that it is riddled with factual errors. Here are some of the things in it that are simply wrong:

There is no such thing as a megalithic stadium. There was no such thing as a "megalithic empire" or indeed a single megalithic culture. Only one monument at Tara dates to the Neolithic. All of the other monuments, including the enclosure, are 1000+ years later than any megalith. The Irish myths and sagas date to the early centuries AD and MAYBE a few centuries earlier; they have nothing to do with the megalithic period. Plato was clear that Atlantis was "in front of the Pillars of Heracles", and Ireland is nowhere near the Pillars of Heracles. Plato said Atlantis was the size of Asia and Libya combined, while Ireland is nowhere near this size. It is statistically invalid only to compare the aspects of Ireland that "match" Atlantis while ignoring those that don't.

These are all factual errors that appear in this book and seriously affected my opinion of it. There are others that would take too long to explain. Anyone who wants to know more is free to email me. But for the reader who is not well-versed in archaeology and ancient history, read this book with caution. It may sound good, but the information it is based on does not hold up to scrutiny.