Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
5.0 out of 5 stars
A fascinating, evenhanded dissection and summary of the oldest legends about aging, April 13, 2007
Now in an updated second edition The Evolution of Aging: How New Theories Will Change the Future of Medicine is a thoughtful historical review of biological theories that seek to answer the question, "Why do we age?" Written by former NASA engineer Theodore C. Goldsmith, The Evolution of Aging covers evolution theory, historic and traditional theories of aging, digital genetics and evolution theory, discoveries affecting aging theory, new theories of evolution and aging, anti-aging research, flaws in the theories discussed, and much more. Accessible to readers of all backgrounds, The Evolution of Aging is a fascinating, evenhanded dissection and summary of the oldest legends about aging, the latest cutting-edge research, and everything in between.
|
|
|
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Why we age, March 21, 2007
It is an undeniable, and undeniably significant, fact that we age. The subject of this book is why we age, and whether this process is as inevitable as the conventional wisdom would have us believe. Its central thesis is that the various currents which weigh against our taking seriously so-called `anti-aging' research are not well-grounded. Goldsmith believes that we need to rethink our preconceived ideas concerning aging, in particular the notion that aging is inevitable and not subject to any sort of biological or medical control.
Along the way to this conclusion we are confronted with a wealth of scientific data, drawn primarily from evolutionary biology. Traditional theories of aging are discussed in some detail, including most prominently accumulation of damage theories. Such accounts hold that aging is the result of the gradual build-up of (usually in themselves) minor sorts of damage to one's body. Goldsmith argues plausibly that traditional theories suffer from a number of possibly crippling defects. For example, most seem to assume that the evolutionary significance of an individual is inversely proportional to its calendar age. Because there are reasons to doubt whether this is true, the traditional theories must come under suspicion.
One problem with the book is that the discussion is rather diffuse and disjointed. The reader often wonders why one topic rather than another is taken up at a given time. Furthermore, while there are many abstract references to scientific results, relatively few citations of actual biological and medical research are provided. Despite these problems, however, the book will be useful to those who would like a general overview of scientific and clinical issues surrounding aging.
|
|
|
|