Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
24 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
The Times They Are A Changin', August 16, 2004
I'm a 17-year resident of Palo Alto, California, land of the $700,000 fixer-upper, and it's indeed a wonderful place to live if you can afford the price of admission: safe, excellent schools, a mild climate, pleasant & bicycle-friendly tree-lined streets, and a community life strongly flavored by proximity to Stanford University. Unlike a number of the subjects interviewed in Rich Karlgaard's Life 2.0, I have been fortunate to enjoy (?) commutes of 20 minutes or less. Downsides? A few: high mortgage, state income tax and property tax bills-EVERYTHING costs more here-congested rush hour and weekend getaway traffic, and a workaholic culture in which one schedules a dinner with friends a month or more in advance and it is rare for a long-time neighbor to be more than a passing acquaintance.
Nonetheless, in recent years my wife and I have often pondered whether we might enhance our family's quality of life by relocating to a smaller community. So far, in the last analysis, it has always come down to, "They don't have my kind of work [biotechnology research] there."
This sort of yearning is part of aging ("When you're young, you want to get away, when you're old you want to go back...") and is not unique to the nation's post-boom cultural and economic circumstances. However in Life 2.0 Karlgaard has identified a number of economic and social developments that in the next 1 or 2 decades could well synergize, transforming "yearning" to "megatrend." These include the aging of the huge baby-boom generation; the prediction, well-informed by history, that the next 10-15 years will likely see below-average investment returns and wage growth; and the huge impact of the information technology revolution that enables much knowledge-or service-based work to be done from anywhere and will doubtless catalyze a great leveling of the world's standard of living over the next two generations. In my opinion, he makes a compelling case.
This subject could easily have been the substance of a ponderous ethereal academic tome or a dry compendium of statistical analysis intertwined with cadaverous prose that would put 10,000 people to sleep if they were running from a napalm attack. Thankfully the author has instead chosen to illustrate his thesis in an engaging way through real people's experiences. The lengthier interviews are devoted to the more unusual and exceptional folks-entrepreneurs of various flavors-who have made successful transitions to stimulating, productive lives in "flyover country." Shorter "sidebars" are also included as excerpts of letters he has received from others who have found happiness and meaning, if somewhat more modest success, in smaller communities. I found the combination very enjoyable and read the book in but three sittings-a remarkable achievement for a 51-year old father of a lively six-year old son who normally takes a month or more to read a book! In addition Life 2.0 was for me a very thought-provoking read on several levels: both in its relevance to my personal circumstances and future, and in a more global (or at least national) sense.
What didn't work so well? As a pilot myself, I think the segments about the author's experiences in personal aviation might have been better integrated. Reading the first part of the book, I imagined that the aviation-related segments would serve as a metaphor for the broader theme, describing the author's own journey through a difficult transformation: finding fulfillment and satisfaction in mastering a new set of skills, finally opening up a completely new set of opportunities and experiences. Instead this theme seemingly just faded away as the narrative progressed and came to no satisfying conclusion. However, the subject and style of Life 2.0 foreshadow future revised editions containing at least updated information and perhaps additional stories. These future editions would also be an opportunity for the author to more tightly weave the theme of personal aviation into his tale.
I enthusiastically recommend Life 2.0 as a very interesting and enjoyable book that will make you think differently about your own life and our society's future. I plan to give it as a Christmas present to a number of family members and friends! In the meantime, my wife and I may make a few investigative visits and domestic inquiries in places such as Payson AZ, Columbia CA, Groveland CA, Albuquerque NM,...
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 of 41 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
It's okay. Some good stories but also questionable, September 28, 2004
This book reminds me of "What Should I Do With My Life?" by Po Bronson, just shorter and with an emphasis on finding a more quality place to live. I didn't mind the side stories about the author's flying experiences and didn't think it took much from the book.
There are two things about the book which I had problems. First, the people profiled were high achievers and not typical of the average citizen that lives in high priced urban areas and is looking for an alternative. Technology has allowed for people to work in places outside of the large cities and it would have been nice to hear about "regular" people who have been able to make the transition to smaller places. The people in the book would probably be successful wherever because of the track record and capital that they had previously built. The second thing I had a problem with was the third section "150 Cheap Places to Live". There are places listed that I had not considered and merit further research. However, there are place listed, such as Boulder, CO, that are very expensive, unless you are downsizing from a house in LA, Silicon Valley, etc... Also, some of the choices are suspect. For example, Cleveland is listed under Bohemian Bargains, yet this city has the highest percentage of residents living in poverty. Omitted was Dallas, TX which has fairly low housing prices and a stable economy versus Austin, which is also reasonable, but not as diverse of an economy.
Overall, I enjoyed reading the book and it is a starting place for thinking about alternative locations to live.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 of 33 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Almost insightless, May 28, 2005
Once you skim the flying blither, there is little other than clumsy narratives about people who have gotten their share of the pie moving out to expropriate the communities of those who have made do with less to build. Karlgaard seems to assume that relocating means one can immediately participate in social structures built painstakingly one year at a time. The author offers no suggestions about how to make a community better by being part of it, only shopping advice for those who are location "consumers". Perhaps "home" is now a commodity to be researched and purchased, but it will not be a place for the heart ot reside.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|