The Lies of George W. Bush: Mastering the Politics of Deception (Hardcover)

by David Corn (Author) "As soon as Bush crashed the race-which already had a crowded field-he was the lead cowboy..." (more)
Key Phrases: tax relief package, terrorism insurance, more tax cuts, White House, United States, Saddam Hussein (more...)

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly
As Washington editor for the Nation, Corn has had his eyes and ears open for what he construes as lies from the Bush White House, and here he has assembled what many will see as an impressive body of evidence. Corn states that Bush has "mugged the truth-not merely in honest error, but deliberately, consistently and repeatedly to advance his career and his agenda." Corn carefully documents alleged falsehoods dating back to the campaign trail covering a full range of issues-from Enron to education, global warming to stem cell research. But this is no simplistic anti-Bush rant; it also faults the media for not underlining the apparent lies and the public for not caring enough.
Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information, Inc.

From Booklist
It's getting a little hard to find a book about George W. Bush that doesn't have the word lie in the title. First came Joe Conanson's Big Lies [BKL Ag 03], which was followed by Al Franken's Lies and the Lying Liars That Tell Them [BKL S 15 03]. Corn's take on the topic is straightforward and chronological. No raised voices here. The longtime editor of the Nation, Corn sets out to build a serious case against Bush in which the president's own words indict him. Beginning with the 2000 campaign ("I am a uniter, not a divider"), Corn examines Bush's record on many issues--the environment, health, the war on terror--all referenced to the president's words, e.g., "The bottom end of the economic ladder receives the biggest percentage [tax] cuts." Obviously, how one views the Bush presidency will color one's reaction to the conclusions drawn here, and though Corn sources much of his material within the text, it is too bad there are no notes appended. It is also unfortunate for Corn that so many books about Republican dissembling have come out lately (others include those by Molly Ivins and Eric Alterman). This is a judicious and readable offering, but the target audience may feel they've heard it all before. Still, Corn is sure to do a round of talking-head appearances, so there may be enough buzz to create demand. Ilene Cooper
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Hardcover: 320 pages
• Publisher: Crown (September 30, 2003)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1400050669
• ISBN-13: 978-1400050666
• Product Dimensions: 9.4 x 6.3 x 1.2 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds
• Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars See all reviews (68 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #357,514 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

  Popular in this category: (What's this?)

  #22 in

  Books > Nonfiction > Social Sciences > Communication > Propaganda

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

514 of 561 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Comprehensive, sobering, poignant, November 6, 2003

By	Michael K. McKeon (Seattle, WA United States) - See all my reviews

For those of us who have devoured the recent books outlining the depradations of the Bush Administration such as those by Vidal, Ivins, Franken, and Moore you will find little revelatory here. However, David Corn is a fine journalist and serious scholar with evident professional integrity. So, what is rewarding about "The Lies of George W. Bush" is its comprehensive, well documented, and scholarly approach -- making it above reproach in terms of research and accuracy.

Corn's basic point and most poignant observation is at the book's beginning. There is nothing unique about Bush as a politician being a liar; in that respect he is in good company. However, he campaigned on a self righteous, moralistic platform asserting that he would maintain clean campaigns and straightforward, honest leadership. It was on this basis that he proclaimed he was entitled to the mantle of leadership rather than Al Gore, whose occasional bending of the truth the Republicans branded reprehensible and immoral. His constituents also assert that unbending commitment to the truth and morality is their quest, yet they relentlessly lie in their ruthless quest for power and profit as they trample the rights and exploit the majority of Americans, and endanger the safety of the planet.

Probably the best, and most telling chapter in the book deals with Bush's "White Collar Lies". He comprehensively outlines Bush's violations of SEC regulations, outright lies, and theft during his involvement in Harken Energy and substantial profits from insider trading, which foreshadowed the later Enron scandal that mirrored this scandal. Corn skillfully compares the two and, in an understated fashion, points out the glaring irony.

Corn very effectively and eloquently outlines that George W. Bush is a well established liar, and on the basis of his widespread, pervasive, and menacing lies, and his ruthlessness in pursuit of any of his objectives that he is unfit to be the President of the United States.

253 of 277 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Despite agreeing with the author, a very disappointing book, October 5, 2003

By	Robert Moore (Chicago, IL USA) - See all my reviews (TOP 50 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)

I completely agree with David Corn's assessment of George W. Bush's struggle with personal honesty, and would go a step further and insist that is his most probably the most dishonest president in the history of our nation. When he writes, "So constant is [Bush's] fibbing that a history of his lies offers a close approximation of the history of his presidential tenure, " he makes as profound a statement about the nature of this administration as is possible. Moreover, I found myself virtually never disagreeing with any statement that he makes in the course of the entire book. Also, as one of the key figures in covering the current (as I write this) story of two White House senior aides blowing the cover of Joseph Wilson's CIA agent wife, I am grateful to his superb journalist efforts over the years.

So why am I not thrilled with the book? Because it is more or less just a laundry list of lies, and not a great deal more. It is a one-note song. My complaint is not with the book that it is, but with the book that it should have been. After cataloging Bush's lies for over three hundred pages, I think only the most partisan of individuals could deny that Bush has a problem with truth telling. The man is patently dishonest, and the book performs a valuable service by articulating all the ways that he engages in dishonesty.

But at the end of the book, I found myself dissatisfied in many ways. Why this enormous reliance on disinformation in the Bush White House? Does it originate from him or from his advisors or from some ongoing movement in the Republican right wing (I believe it is all three)? What does this reliance on distortion and misleading the public say about American culture? Why has the media, until recently, been unwilling to call Bush to the carpet on some of his more outrageous errors? Or why couldn't Corn have discussed the question of whether it is possible to be honest in today's political climate? This is not nitpicking: these are the kinds of questions that would arise for any reasonably intelligent person reading the book.

I also have some trouble with using "lie" when in fact Bush's struggles with the truth are far more multifarious. For instance, often what he says, while wrong, may be things he actually believes, for instance when he calls Ariel Sharon a man of peace. No one who knows anything about Sharon could possibly make that assessment (indeed, his political base in Israel supports him precisely because he is not a man of peace), but when Bush says that, it is a lie, or a belief based either in ignorance or self-deception? For something to qualify as a lie, one must consciously know that what one is saying is not true. In other words, I believe a lot of the untrue things that Bush says is based on an inability to assess the truth of a situation. Not every mistaken statement qualifies as a lie.

Mind you, Bush does lie, but many of his false statements are not, as such, lies. Some are mistakes of fact. Some result from his ability to convince himself that something is true that isn't. A gigantic amount of what he says is simply PR or propaganda, such as calling his deregulation of environmental standards a "Clear Skies" program (whereas it is in fact merely a license to pollute). This is clearly dishonest, and while there is a bit of the lie in all propaganda, it doesn't come up to the level of a lie. Spinning a situation isn't lying so much as attempting to color the facts in a way that is more sympathetic to one's own agenda. Dishonest, yet, but a lie, no. I would have been more comfortable if the title of the book had been THE DISHONESTY OF GEORGE W. BUSH.

Nonetheless, the book is very definitely not without value, but of the recent spate of books critical of the Right and the Bush administration, this is not one of the best. Paul Krugman in THE GREAT UNRAVELING deals with much of the dishonesty inherent in the Bush administration (Krugman was, in fact, the first journalist I know of to explicitly call Bush a liar). Molly Ivins and Lou Dubose in BUSHWHACKED go into great detail about not merely the dishonesty of the Bush policies but the concrete ways in which they harm real human beings. On a humorous level, Al Franken tackles Right wing (including Bush) dishonesty in a way that is both accurate and hysterical. I would recommend all of these before Corn's book.

35 of 35 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Overall a pretty good book, January 11, 2005

By	Obi "Obi wan liberali" (SLC, UT) - See all my reviews

Though I think the author overstates some things in the book, it is effective in showing a pattern of deception with George W. Bush that preceded his advent to the Whitehouse and characterizes his administration today.

What is most alarming about the book is the lesson that lying actually can work. With a propaganda machine of neocon pundits running interference for him, this President has taken more liberties with the truth than even Nixon.

One thing that would have greatly strengthened the book was the use of footnotes. I find it likely that the author has good sources for his statements, but the lack of footnotes severely weakens book as a means of clearly showing the lies told by George W. Bush.