Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Brilliant and bizarre, December 20, 2001
By A Customer
These books (since this review will show up under Frank vol. 1 and Frank vol. 2) are amazing. Wordless stories drawn in all different styles, always beautiful. The comparison to Krazy Kat is certainly apropos. These stories usually involve just a few key characters playing off each other in each story in different and fascinating ways every time. Manhog, the loser; Jerry Chicken, the mercant; Pupshaw, the "godling" (Frank's pet -- "god" is obviously related to "dog" in this case); and Frank, "our hero" who isn't always moral. In the black and white stories, the backgrounds are drawn in a woodcut style, and the color stories are painted with a beauty that can be compared to (I wish I knew more about this stuff) Dali and such. FRANK is completely different from anything you'll ever read, and it's quite possible (as another reviewer says) that it is the only comic from Fantagraphics, Drawn & Quarterly, or anybody to show any real vision. Certainly it's the only one today to use original characters, doing interesting, cartoony doings and still be amazing art. Chris Ware is brilliant but seems capable only of one set of emotions; besides "Ghost World," Daniel Clowes really isn't that great; and I hate R. Crumb except for his very early greeting-card and sketchbook stuff, which amounts to just well-made funny comics (which were all over the place in the fourties, and aren't really that special except that no one is really doing them anymore).Anyway, these books are wonderful. I give them four stars because I like better the current ongoing FRANK comic magazines from Fantagraphics (five so far, 12 or so pages each). They further simplify the characters and environment to the essence. And they have more PUPSHAW! I can't tell you how much I love Pupshaw and Pushpaw. I would buy an 800-page book if Pupshaw and Pushpaw were on every page. Anyway, get these books because no one else today is doing work this brilliant.
|
|
|
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Sorcerous., May 25, 1998
By A Customer
In a field seeded with so many noxious weeds, a single precious flower blossoms all the more beautifully. The cognitively dissonant archgeeks who publish Jim Woodring have previously tried to convince us that pretentious, uninformed pop-culture soup is literature (the Hernandez brothers), that a sorry, self-absorbed jerk's deviant fantasies are art (Robert Crumb), that heavy-handed stories from British authors who seemingly contrive their ideas from the jacket blurbs on books they don't understand are writing (Alan Moore, Neil Gaiman), and that juvenile rants and bathetic posing are "alternative" (virtually the entire Fantagraphics catalog). Out of this unreformable nuthouse has emerged, somehow, this wizard Jim Woodring, a perfect, self-contained visionary genius, and the most (or only) significant cartoonist since George Herriman. His flavor might be described as a sort of cross between Dali and Carlos Castaneda, only Americanized and cartoonified (the better to deceive us with). If comic-book people had any taste or consciousness, they might realize this is the only one of their own who will be remembered into the next millinneum, and that promoting his work in the same breath with that of the warped midgets surrounding him serves only to detract from something so rare in this medium: a genuine creative expression of things worth expressing. Leave them, then, to their fannish cults, to their Peter Bagge, their Dan Clowes, their Roberta Gregory; they all deserve each other. This Woodring is the only cartoonist you need. (And for heaven's sake, do buy this book). END
|
|
|
4.0 out of 5 stars
More woodchuck dreams from Jim Woodring, January 7, 2000
Whereas the first (excellent) volume of Frank tales tended to have a moody dreamlike quality, this second collection is a bit more dark and nightmarish--but then everyone who reads Frank has a different reaction; that's what makes Woodring's work so good. My only gripe is the editorial decision to present the first story, "Frank's Real Pa," in a large panel format, thereby taking up a whopping fifty pages when it could have just as easily taken up ten, leaving more room for other Frank tales.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|