or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
 
Express Checkout with PayPhrase
What's this? | Create PayPhrase
Sorry!
More Buying Choices
37 used & new from $8.21

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
Are Cops Racist?
 
 
Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle

Don’t have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here.
 
  

Are Cops Racist? (Hardcover)

~ (Author)
Key Phrases: riot ideology, police racism, civilian complaints, New York, Are Cops Racist, New Jersey (more...)
3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (14 customer reviews)

List Price: $22.50
Price: $18.00 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $4.50 (20%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.

Only 3 left in stock--order soon (more on the way).

Want it delivered Tuesday, November 10? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
16 new from $13.14 21 used from $8.21

Frequently Bought Together

Customers buy this book with The Burden of Bad Ideas: How Modern Intellectuals Misshape Our Society by Heather Mac Donald

Are Cops Racist? + The Burden of Bad Ideas: How Modern Intellectuals Misshape Our Society

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Biology at Work: Rethinking Sexual Equality (The Rutgers Series in Human Evolution)

Biology at Work: Rethinking Sexual Equality (The Rutgers Series in Human Evolution)

by Kingsley R. Browne
4.0 out of 5 stars (4)  $28.95
Diversity: The Invention of a Concept

Diversity: The Invention of a Concept

by Peter Wood
4.9 out of 5 stars (13)  $14.00
Making Diversity Work: 7 Steps for Defeating Bias in the Workplace

Making Diversity Work: 7 Steps for Defeating Bias in the Workplace

by Sondra Thiederman
4.5 out of 5 stars (2)  $12.21
Black Rednecks and White Liberals

Black Rednecks and White Liberals

by Thomas Sowell
When Cultures Collide: Leading Across Cultures

When Cultures Collide: Leading Across Cultures

by Richard D. Lewis
4.7 out of 5 stars (10)  $19.08
Explore similar items

Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com Review

"The anti-profiling crusade thrives on an ignorance of policing and a willful blindness to the demographics of crime," writes Heather Mac Donald in this powerful and persuasive examination of racial profiling. Noting that crime has dropped in urban areas over the past decade, she writes that "The last ten years should have been a time of triumph for law enforcement, not an occasion for frenzied cop-bashing." Yet an anti-police stance has pervaded the media in recent years, particularly in The New York Times, she says. This bias, combined with suffocating federal regulations, brought about by both the Clinton and the Bush Justice Departments, threaten to reverse the progress made. It also causes unnecessary friction between police and the public, makes neighborhoods less safe, and even dissuades officers from fighting crime aggressively for fear of being labeled a racist. In instances where the police were clearly in the wrong--most notably the much-publicized and tragic Amadou Diallo shooting--Mac Donald posits that these are isolated cases of poor judgment and failure to follow procedure rather than evidence of systemic racism.

Since much of the profiling issue revolves around highway patrolling, Mac Donald looks closely at the misleading statistics that have been used to back up such practices as tabulating the race of drivers pulled over by the police. Mac Donald punches so many holes in the statistics that it's difficult not to concur with her. She further attacks the "collective fairy tale that all groups commit drug crimes at equal rates," arguing that the police are simply going to where the crime is, not willfully picking on one group while ignoring others. She also does extensive field work: interviewing cops around the country, particularly black officers who find the race-bias argument specious; reporting from urban neighborhoods; and witnessing firsthand how the New York Police Department trains its rookie officers. She also points out that local police are "the first line of defense against terrorism" and makes a particularly compelling argument that racial-profiling should be used as a tool in combating such threats. Overall, this forceful book is sure to arouse controversy--which is exactly the point. --Shawn Carkonen



From Library Journal

MacDonald (The Burden of Bad Ideas) is one of the few authors who attempts to justify current policing methods, arguing that the truth about policing and issues related to race is not known to the general public. She contends that the police should be receiving accolades for all the good work they do; instead, they are constantly attacked by the media (especially the New York Times), which offer unsubstantiated claims that racial profiling is running amok. MacDonald presents a great deal of evidence to debunk this media-driven myth: law-abiding inner-city citizens want a highly visible police presence, black officers pull over the same percentage of minority motorists as do their white counterparts, officers receive many hours of sensitivity and diversity training, and so on. In particular, she takes great exception to what she sees as the New York Times's biased approach to covering police matters, showing, for instance, that they do not report such incidents as police officers capturing gun-wielding felons without firing a shot, as the NYPD has done 155 times since 1995. This book is essential reading for anyone who assumes that racial profiling is an undisputed fact. Highly recommended for collections in criminal justice and the social sciences.
Tim Delaney, Canisius Coll., Buffalo, NY
Copyright 2002 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 192 pages
  • Publisher: Ivan R. Dee, Publisher (January 25, 2003)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 156663489X
  • ISBN-13: 978-1566634892
  • Product Dimensions: 8.6 x 5.6 x 0.8 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 12 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (14 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.com Sales Rank: #582,519 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

More About the Author

Heather Mac Donald
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Visit Amazon's Heather Mac Donald Page

Inside This Book (learn more)



Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

 

Customer Reviews

14 Reviews
5 star:
 (6)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:
 (4)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.4 out of 5 stars (14 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
39 of 48 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars The book debunks some sacred myths, November 22, 2003
By A Customer
We all decry racial-profiling, right? Only one problem: racial profiling does not exist.

The author documents how this myth began with black "leaders" complaining that too many blacks were being stopped for traffic violations. Liberal politicians quickly jumped on the bandwagon and demanded a study. With hysteria in full bloom, a federal study was produced showing that blacks were, indeed, stopped at a disproportionate rate for traffic violations along the New Jersey Turnpike. With the New Jersey Turnpike study in hand, President Clinton, then candidate G.W. Bush, and numerous governors were all out denouncing racial profiling and demanding reform. The hysteria then moved to the courts were numerous arrests were thrown out due to the claim that they were stopped because of their race.

Nobody ever asked the question: Are blacks being stopped at a disproportionate rate because they are committing traffic violations at a disproportionate rate. Even asking such a question usually resulted in charges of racism. To answer this question, however, the New Jersey Attorney General commissioned a study that employed radar to trigger a camera which snapped a picture of the driver whenever said driver exceeded the speed limit along points throughout New Jersey Turnpike. The report showed that blacks did, indeed, speed at a disproportionate rate, double that of whites. Needless to say, the politicians were shocked at the results. The DOJ continued to sidestep the study. The study was performed by the Public Service Institute for Safety in Maryland. The researchers even offered to submit the tests and methodologies to the National Academy of Sciences for peer review. In the end the media and politicians didn't contest the results, they instead chose to just ignore the study. Nobody wanted to tell black folks that they speed at twice the rate of whites and, hence, were ticketed at twice the rate of whites, especially after all the hoopla. The results were not politically acceptable.

The book debunks many other charges of racism such as that during the Cincinnati riots. We all heard about the white racist cops that were out of control and shooting innocent black folks in Cincinnati. Cincinnati suffered greatly during the riots with black "leaders" out front demanding reform to stop the racist cops and demanding more government social programs to appease the agry rioters. The facts, however, showed that of the 15 black offenders that were shot to death, four were shot by black officers. One of the offenders was shot after he hacked to death his girlfriend and was waving the axe at the cops. Another was shot after he dragged a black police officer to his death. In short, when the facts were examined, there was no evidence that the cops were racist and out of control.

After reading this book and books like "Coloring the News" one has to ask why is there so much manipulation out there designed to inflame black resentment against cops, against the government, and against whites in general. Why is there a constant stream of misinformation designed to keep black folks bitter and resentful against whites in general? First, many black "leaders" gain power and prestige and are rewarded financially with more government programs when racial tension is increased. Jesse Jackson, for instance, lives in a 16 room mansion. He obviously has benefited greatly by inflaming racial tensions against large corporations and against the government, and then offering to fix the problems for large fees. Second, the Democrats are beholden to a black constituency. 90% of the black vote went to Democrats. So the Democrats obviously have a stake in perpetuating myths that blacks need the Democrats to rectify the racial situation. Without the black vote the Democratic party would be dead. So there are many reasons for this.

As far as being stopped. I have been stopped numerous times-I am white. In each instance, I stayed calm, cooperated, and was usually sent on my way with a ticket. Nothing newsworthy.

Comment Comments (4) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
41 of 52 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars An excellent, well-researched piece of work., May 26, 2003
I just finished reading "Are Cops Racist" by Heather MacDonald. As an African-American and newly minted "Black Neo-conservative," I commend the author for not only showing, though painstaking reseach, interviews and thoughtful analysis, the fictitious and politcally motivated accusations against cops of racial profiling, but also stressing how such nonsense (further propogated by a left-leaning media) will do more harm than good to law-abiding citizens - particularly African-Americans. As the old saying goes, "the truth hurts." This book should leave cop-bashers nationwide with a serious hangover for a long time.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
26 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars How anti-profiling lobbying produces harmful results, February 8, 2003
By Midwest Book Review (Oregon, WI USA) - See all my reviews
Heather MacDonald's Are Cops Racist? maintains that opposition to racial profiling threatens to erode crime-fighting gains of the last decade. Chapters show how this profiling has led to increased insights on the demographics of crime and criminals - and chapters consider how anti-profiling lobbying produces harmful results for blacks and all peoples. An intriguing discussion.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Rude Awakening
This book is extremely informative. The police in America are not portrayed with honesty in American films..... Read more
Published 2 months ago by Patricia M. Mccommas

1.0 out of 5 stars Wow....this was disappointing
You simply cannot make claims that are not supported by a preponderance of the available facts and information. Read more
Published 3 months ago by Earlybird

1.0 out of 5 stars Novel concept marred by shoddy scholarship and polemic tone
Doing research on the roots of racial profiling, I came across this work by right-wing writer for the Manhattan Institute, Heather MacDonald. Read more
Published 6 months ago by B.BarNavi

4.0 out of 5 stars Excellent analysis of the political correctness in law enforcement
Let me first state that I was a prior law enforcement officer on the state and Federal Level. With that in mind, Ms. Read more
Published on September 20, 2007 by matt's long commute

3.0 out of 5 stars Denies basic human Nature
I've always been careful not to believe propaganda from the left or the right. I like to think of myself as a "self thinker" and have always held dear, the idea of personal... Read more
Published on August 1, 2007 by chazm

4.0 out of 5 stars Must read for any street officer !
Great book looks at racial profiling from an officers perspective as well as from the non-criminal community eyes.
Published on May 7, 2007 by S. Titterington

5.0 out of 5 stars Most revealing book Ive read in ages
Heather does a great job of sifting through the media drama and finding out what the real issues are. I have a completely different view of this issue after reading this book.
Published on September 8, 2006 by M. Rodriguez

2.0 out of 5 stars How credible could she be?
Heather MacDonald needs to focus less on the argument that Blacks in general {and others} as a whole are anti-police and anit-profiling. Read more
Published on December 16, 2005 by Lindsay

1.0 out of 5 stars Wanted to like it, but was very dissapointed
I was looking forward to reading this book. Heather Mac Donald's writing came highly recommended from a friend, and I'm sympathetic to her argument in this book. Read more
Published on March 19, 2004 by Jerry Brito

1.0 out of 5 stars Living with Rose Colored Glasses in the land of OZ
The author is a master of the english language and seems to have an answer for everything. The title question itself is flawed since it's an all or nothing question. Read more
Published on May 31, 2003 by darkguardian2

Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   



So You'd Like to...


Create a guide

Product Information from the Amapedia Community

Beta (What's this?)


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject

 

Feedback

If you need help or have a question for Customer Service, contact us.
 Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
Is there any other feedback you would like to provide?

Your comments can help make our site better for everyone.


Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.