|
|
29 of 43 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Leftist propaganda, mostly lies., March 25, 1999
This is a pernicious piece of leftist propaganda. The most obvious lie is that the author is politically neutral. Other pieces of nonsense litter the book from the preface and early chapters on. For example, on page five the author states that the United States embargo kept information about AIDS out of Vietnam. This is such an utter lie that it is embarrassing. It is well known that the Vietnamese government itself kept this information out of the country through its highly efficient censorship of news and information. Government censorship is still being used to edit out information regarding internal problems, including drug abuse. A better perspective on the absurdity of the Vietnamese medical establishment, which readily received medical supplies from the U.S. during the embargo, can be obtained by reading Brothers in Arms by William Broyles, Jr. This book was recommended to me by my guide while I was there.In Grace Paley's preface to the book, it is stated that the United States defended "Quang Tri with almost total destruction". Along with a strange notion of geography (on the other side of what river is Quang Ngai, which is in fact south of Danang!), it is not mentioned that the actual destruction of Quang Tri was a result of the violation of the Paris accords by the Armies of the North in 1972. In fact, the stretch of Highway 1 around Quang Tri and Dong Ha, originally called the Street Without Joy by the French, has been renamed the Street of Terror by the locals. This is because of the 30,000 or so civilians, fleeing Dong Ha and the invading North Vietnamese Army, who were intenionally slaughtered by North Vietnamese artillery. Those terrified civilians remembered the 5,000 or more men, women and children who were massacred by the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese during their occupation of Hue in the 1968 Tet offensive. Many of those massacred in Hue were buried alive. I have returned to Vietnam recently and can say that it is difficult to find anyone who is now proud of having served with the Viet Cong. In fact, from Hoi An to the DMZ the Marines are heroes. The Hanoi Government is an extremely corrupt police state that is killing its citizens and its economy, and is uniformly hated in both the North and the South, which essentially remain two countries, just as they were before the war. It's obvious that the reason the current regime allowed this woman to live in a former Viet Cong village is the same as the reason that they allowed the Marxist Tom Hayden and such notables as Jane Fonda to travel in their country, namely for propaganda purposes. However, the true colors of the revolution, which purged any nationalist (non-Marixt) elements after the war, have been shown in recent times, even though the news media of the United States still does not publish the stories of oppression and political and religious persecution in that country. It is apparent that the reason Lady Jane wrote this misleading account was to try to reconcile the embarrassing truth told by the fleeing boat people with her own belief in the beneficent Marxist government that conquered the South. My own experience is that the country is full of people who are struggling to leave, mostly without success. I could introduce Paley and Lady Jane to a woman who lived outside Dong Ha all through the war, still living there, who would tell a different story if she was not afraid of reprisals against herself and her family. And I know a former boat person from Quang Ngai, living in the United States, who would also tell a different story. In truth, this book is a piece of propaganda meant to cover the embarrassment of a leftist who helped victimize the South Vietnamese people by supporting a brutal Stalinist regime in one of the lost battles of the Cold War. Unfortunately, those people are still suffering with the result of that failure on our part. If you want to revisit and marvel at the nonsense spewed out about the wonderful Communists during the 60s and 70s, then read this book in that spirit, but if you want some truth read the more balanced account of a revisit by William Broyes, Jr. mentioned above.
|