|
45 of 47 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
By Ed Zimmer, February 1, 2000
By A Customer
Inventor Book ReviewAdditional comments by Ed Zimmer, 800-468-8871, The Entrepreneur Network. I'll carry Bill's recommendation of this book a step farther -- this is a great book. It's the definitive book on product licensing for the independent inventor! I've been looking for a book like this since we started this network almost ten years ago. The best I'd found previously was Tom Mosley's Marketing Your Invention. That's a good book -- it does a good job of arguing the case for licensing and in presenting the mechanics of marketing intellectual property. But it doesn't do a good job of conveying the "art" of making a deal -- which is the very essence of selling anything, and especially intellectual property. What I was looking for was something more analogous to David Pressman's Patent It Yourself. Pressman does such a great job of conveying the "art" of invention patenting that, by the time you finish the book, you thoroughly understand what a patent attorney does -- and although you may now know "how" to do what the patent attorney does, you also understand why he can do it so much better than you. And that's what Docie's book does in conveying the "art" of invention marketing. He shows you step by step -- with examples -- how to find and put together invention licensing deals. If you follow the steps that he lays out -- and do them all well -- if there's any chance of your invention licensing, you'll find it and do the deal. And if there's no chance of its licensing, you'll also find that out -- quickly and efficiently. Now the trick of course is "doing all [the steps] well". That's the "art" of invention marketing -- and that's what Docie conveys so well in this book. If you seriously study his book, you will absolutely know "how" to go about marketing your (or anybody else's) invention. But... just because you know "how" to do it doesn't mean you "can" do it. Competent invention marketing requires a good deal of business knowledge and common sense, a degree of extroversion, chutzpah and initiative and, perhaps most important, the ability to listen and react productively. These -- and especially the last -- are not particularly strong attributes of the average independent inventor. Like Pressman, Docie figures that once you understand how a professional (like him) goes about marketing an invention, you'll likewise understand why he can do it so much better than you. So why buy a book whose goal is to convince you to hire a professional? For the same reason you bought Pressman -- to understand the methods and skills professionals bring to the problem. Given that understanding, if you decide to try to do the work yourself, you'll at least know what you're up against. And if you decide to hire a professional, you'll at least know how to communicate with him and what to expect from him. Should you hire a professional to market your invention? If you want to give your invention its best shot -- absolutely! A competent professional will give your invention its best chance. The problem comes in judging whether the person you're hiring really is "competent". This book gives you a fighting chance at making a rational judgment. If they're following the procedures Docie outlines -- and aren't taking forever doing so -- you can be pretty sure they know "how" to do it. (There's still a question whether they "can" do it. But that's a problem you face when you hire any professional -- there's little to go on other than their past "success" record.) If you go this way, make sure you divide the work up into small manageable chunks -- each with a clear goal -- costing no more than you're willing to swallow if the goal isn't achieved. A couple of years ago, I did an article, The Provisional Application, that outlined a low-cost approach to invention marketing that most inventors can do on their own. Your odds (of successfully licensing) using that strategy are definitely lower than if you use a competent marketing professional. It basically comes down to the old saw, "Nothing sells itself". But like all rules, there are exceptions in the extremes. If you come up with a business-to-business product that really solves a long-standing problem in a particular industry -- or saves the producers in that industry significant costs -- your "selling" doesn't have to be much more than simply "presenting" the product. You have an educated profit-motivated customer set who are actively looking for what you have to sell -- and if it's "real", will literally sell themselves. Likewise with licensing intellectual property. If you have the exceptional product or process, your customer set (the prospective licensees you approach) will recognize it and try to deal for it. In fact, they're likely to more readily recognize it as "exceptional" -- simply because they're more familiar with their industry and their market than the typical inventor. In any event, simply "presenting" it to them. as proposed in the Provisional Application article, provides the independent inventor with much better odds than either not trying at all or spending a bunch of patent money and then waiting for someone to contact them simply because the patent issued. So... if you want to maximize your odds of licensing -- and you have the money -- and you take great care (and accept the risk) that that money buys you the "competence" you need -- then go with the invention marketing professional. And -- please -- if you plan to go this route, bring him in early -- earlier in fact than a patent attorney. With a few phone calls, he can save you the cost of the 95 of 100 patents that would never license anyway -- even if you had them. And the competent invention marketer -- stress "competent" -- frequently doesn't need a patent to make a deal. He'll recommend a patent only if it's necessary to make a deal or it's likely to make possible a much better deal. Whichever direction you decide to go, you really oughta get and study Docie's book.
|