Moses and Akhenaten: The Secret History of Egypt at the Time of the Exodus (Paperback)

by Ahmed Osman (Author)

Editorial Reviews

Review
Essential reading for all Bible historians. -- Andrew Collins, author of From the Ashes of Angels and Gateway to Atlantis

Review
"The classic work which redefines the timeframe of the Exodus and places it firmly in the age of Akhenaten and Tutankhamun. Essential reading for all Bible historians."
(Andrew Collins, author of From the Ashes of Angels and Gateway to Atlantis )

"His study makes for an interesting alternative perspective."
(

Nexus, March/April 2003

)

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Paperback: 280 pages
• Publisher: Bear & Company; 2 edition (October 1, 2002)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1591430046
• ISBN-13: 978-1591430049
• Product Dimensions: 8.5 x 6.8 x 0.8 inches
• Shipping Weight: 15.7 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.6 out of 5 stars See all reviews (16 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #228,647 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

  Popular in this category: (What's this?)

  #50 in

  Books > History > Ancient > Africa

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

27 of 29 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Worth more than just a cursory glance, December 6, 2004

By	Phil (Brooklyn, NY) - See all my reviews

Before I begin my review, in response to Richard Lewis' review: before you begin laughing at the idea of Atenism being the first monotheistic religion, I suggest you read your history books. Most historians (in fact, I can't think of any who dispute it) agree that Atenism is at the very least the first case of monotheism that can be supported with archeological evidence. If you had read the Hymn to Aten, you would have come upon the lines: "O Sole God, whose powers no other possesseth" and "The Living Aten, there is none other than he." Akhenaten was actually adamant that no other gods be worshipped under his reign (What on earth are your sources that Ma'at was worshipped?). Polytheism slowly began to emerge in Armana when Smenkhare was installed as co-regent as a political compromise. But, certainly at the beginning of his rule, no other gods were worshipped publically in cities controlled by the Pharaoh (Thebes was not under the religious control of the pharaoh after the capital was moved to Akhetaten, now Tell el-Amarna). Even Donald Redford, a well-known critic of Akhenaten, views Atenism as the first monotheistic religion. O and worshipping many gods and goddesses as manifestations of one god while more sophisticated than, say, Greek polytheism, does not qualify as true monotheism.
I just don't want people who are unfamiliar with the subject matter to think that it's a shocking claim (it's very well accepted). What is shocking and deserving of scrutiny is his claim that Moses and Akhenaten were the same person. Osman does a good job of providing some very compelling circumstantial evidence. For example, the transliteration of the Ancient Hebrew "Adonai" to "Aten" and the tracing of "Moses" to the Egyptian word "Mos". Its also compelling that Akhenaten's grave has never been found (a fact echoed in my other reading). In any case, I find Ahmed Osman remarkably inconsistent as a scholar. His arguments range from very cohesive and clear (even when covering uncharted territories) to frustratingly convoluted and obtuse. I would have given this a lower rating for that reason except that I think his central idea is one worthy of a lot of attention. The parallels are very powerful between Moses' and Akheanaten's life stories. Ahmed does an excellent job establishing an overlapping chronology for their lives. I also think his re-intepretation of biblical symbols at the end of Moses' life is interesting. In the end, this is just a theory, but one that very well may be true.
And, because of this, I think it's tragic that Osman published "In the House of Pharaohs" claiming that Jesus and Tutankhamen were the same person. That's just ridiculous. i haven't even read that book, but Tutankhamen was a polytheist who died at the age of 19. Way to completely discredit yourself as a serious Egyptologist. Anyone who wants to read more about Tutankhamen, Akhenaten's son, should read The Murder of Tutankhamen by Bob Brier, easily one of the best books written on this subject.

27 of 32 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Composite review of two books - 'Act of God' and 'Out of Egypt', July 13, 2006

By	Mr. H. A. Imam "Hasan Ali Imam" (UK and Bangladesh) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

I thought it prudent to do a generic review of the two books so at least they can be compared as they are dealing with the same topics. The two books are `Act of God' by Graham Philips and `Out of Egypt' by Ahmed Osman. They should be read concurrently.

[*NB: Out of Egypt seems to be out of print hence not listed on Amazon. As my review dealt with Moses and Akhenaten, I have placed my review here even though I have not read Osman's book, 'Moses and Akhenaten. Will get hold of it soon!]

The two authors of their respective books do talk about the same topic of the origins of the Bible stories of Moses and Pharoah (Osman also talks about Christianity) but they have different interpretations of the events and identities of the persons involved. At the outset both books seem to furnish the reader with evidence for their theories and convincingly so. But when the two books are compared, they are diametrically opposed.

1. Identity of Moses:

- Philip's view: It was a prince called `Tuthmosis' whose account in Egyptian literature is spurious and not much is said about him. He was the elder brother of Akhenaten and rightful heir to the throne before he mysteriously disappears. Both Moses and Akhenaten shared the similar views about the one deity. Some of the Atenists joined the Israelites during the Exodus

- Osman's view: Moses was Akhenaten. Because they shared the same religious beliefs they must have been the same person

2. Identities of other peoples

- Philip's view: The other peoples such as David, Joshua, Tutenkhamun etc. are as accepted by the conventional thought

- Osman's view: Tutenkhamun was Jesus. He was killed on Mt. Sinai by Pinhas. Osman argues that the New testament also claims that the Roman soldier who killed Jesus on the cross was Pinhas. Hence the real physical Jesus (Titenkahmun) was confused with the spiritual Jesus of the New Testament. Tuthmosis III was David. Aye was Joseph of Arimathea. Amonhotep III was Solomon

3. Cause of River Nile Turning Red

- Philip's view: Mt. Thera erupted and blocked sunlight. Iron Oxide spewed out and gave the Nile the reddish colour. Because of the catastrophe, plagues ensued and fish died on the Nile.

- Osman's view: The Nile turning red is seasonal. During the season of Inundation, the Nile waters turn reddish. If the events took place in the Eastern Delta this suggests late Summer. The plagues were natural occurrences during the course of the Egyptian year.

4. Origin and meaning of the name, `Moses'

- Philip's view: It is from the Egyptian word, `Mosis' or Mos, meaning `son'. Many people thought that the Hebrew name of Moshe was given to Moses because it means `to draw', and he was drawn out of the water. Philips makes a good point that Egyptians did not use Hebrew. So `Mos' was used which means `son'. The woman who adopted Moses brought him up as a son and a part of the Royal household. `Mos' is used as an adjunct to `Tuth'. Hence the name `Tuthmosis'. So the shady character, Tuthmosis (Akhenaten's older brother) was Moses who led the Israelites out of Egypt.

- Osman's view: Similar to Philips. He also refers to the Hebrew `Moshe' (to draw). But Osman understands `Mos' to mean son in context of a rightful heir, i.e. royalty. As Akhenaten was the rightful heir of Amonhotep III, therefore Akhenaten is Moses.

Summary

You can see how the two different authors are diametrically opposed to each other, yet they seem to furnish their theories with evidence. I came across Graham Philip's book by the suggestion of an Atheist who seemed to be convinced by his investigative research. But as the reader can judge, theories are not proof! The conspiracy theories further become ludicrous when other authors try to link the Pyramids with alien contact (Robert Temple,`The Sirius Mystery' or Peter Lemesurier, 'Gods of the Dawn').

I believe that the best book on the Hebrews and the Egyptians is by the late Maurice Bucaille (well known for his classic, `The Bible, the Quran and Science'), a French doctor and Egyptologist, who gives a very objective account of the Israelites and sheds some interesting light on the Bible and the Quran. The name of this book is, `The Hebrews in Egypt'. This book makes more sense than the portfolio of exotic theories that surround the pyramids, the Jews and the ancient Egyptians. Unfortunately this book is not available at Amazon. Visit a Muslim bookstore.

By Hasan Ali Imam
Ex-Parliamentary Candidate, Conservative Party
UK

20 of 23 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Moses is Back from Exile and with a Vengence, January 20, 2003

By	Charles N. Pope (Orlando, Florida United States) - See all my reviews

It has been said that Moses is a figure of myth that was lost to history, and that Akhenaten is a man of history who strangely does not figure in myth. It is largely due to Ahmed Osman that many people now consider the link between the so-called heretic king Akhenaten and Biblical Moses to be self-evident. The increasing popularity of his work has now provoked the jealous rage of institutional scholars as shamefully evidenced in the March 2002 issue of Archaeology Magazine. Sadly, the pioneering work "Moses: Pharaoh of Egypt" by Ahmed Osman has been out of print and difficult to acquire for many years. But no longer. Under this new title you can read for yourself the arguments that have launched a revolution in the way we think about the ancient world and the Scriptures.