The Gospel of Philip: Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and the Gnosis of Sacred Union (Paperback)

~ Jean-Yves Leloup (Author), Jacob Needleman (Foreword)

Editorial Reviews

From Booklist

The Gnostic Gospel of Philip, discovered in 1947 at Nag Hammadi, Egypt, is best known for a verse that portrays Jesus kissing Mary Magdalene on the lips. Although this is the most visual image in that gospel, the underlying message, about the sacredness of the marital union, was also controversial in early Christianity, as it established closer links to Judaism and the belief in a space of holiness that can occur in the physical act of love. Leloup, who has also written on the Gospel of Mary Magdalene, here translates Philip's gospel from the Coptic (Joseph Rowe translates Leloup's French into English) and offers a rather brief analysis of the text (he promises more in a future book). Still, what he does cover--ways to look at conception, birth, and the relationship between man, woman, and God--is well thought out and understandable to the lay reader. Most of the book is taken up with actual translation and visuals of the Coptic original from which Leloup worked. Ilene Cooper
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved

Review

“In this rich and lucid translation, Jean-Yves Leloup unlocks mysteries of the enigmatic bridal chamber found in the Gospel of Philip and sheds new light on their associations with Jewish esoteric tradition.”
(Margaret Starbird, author of The Woman with the Alabaster Jar: Mary Magdalene and the Holy Grail )

“For scholars and seekers alike, every page of this book opens profound new dimensions in the teachings of Jesus.”
(Jacob Needleman, author of Lost Christianity and The American Soul )

"This book displays new and profound facets and dimensions in the teachings of Jesus."
(East and West Series, Vol. 48, No. 2, Feb 2006 )

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Paperback: 192 pages
• Publisher: Inner Traditions (August 16, 2004)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1594770220
• ISBN-13: 978-1594770227
• Product Dimensions: 8.8 x 6 x 0.6 inches
• Shipping Weight: 9.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #270,689 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

  Popular in this category: (What's this?)

  #78 in

  Books > Religion & Spirituality > Bible & Other Sacred Texts > Apocrypha

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

40 of 43 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars "Steamy Sex with Jesus and Mary"? Hardly, But a Fine Book., October 17, 2004

By	HarryFan "CourseHead" (Pacific NW) - See all my reviews

Kudos to Mr. Leloup for a valuable contribution (if a somewhat free "translation") to our knowledge of this gem from the Nag Hammadi library, where it lay in jar in the same "volume" as the profoundly important "Gospel of Thomas" for nearly 2000 years. As to the publisher's misleading (and inadvertently hilarious) back-cover enticements, well, that's another story. "The Gospel of Philip," we are assured in the breathless copy, "is best known for its portrayal of the physical relationship shared by Jesus and his most beloved disciple, Mary Magdalene." Ahem - not quite. There is a line, in this translation anyway, in which Jesus kisses Mary "on the lips," eliciting what is apparently jealousy on the part of the other disciples (though this is not quite clear). And that's about it for the Jesus - Mary connection. It is true that, in this translation at least, the reunification of mankind required for the return to God is described twice in terms of an analogy to sexual union in the "bridal chamber," but there is nothing at all depicting Mary and Jesus in any such bridal chamber or union (the aforementioned lip-kissing excepted). Sorry to have to be the one to tell you.

As to the translation itself (following a scholarly Introduction, dating the Gospel of Philip to roughly 150 C.E.), Leloup concedes that his rendering of the opaque original text (largely incomprehensible gibberish in the earlier Nag Hammadi Library translation) is creative and speculative, and it is fairly obvious that he has been influenced by A Course in Miracles, for which he finds ample support in the Gospel. Indeed, the most moving (because most comprehensible) parts of the text are those which depict the re-gathering of mankind (all life, actually) into what the Course describes as the Sonship, as the last triumphant step before the return to God. If Leloup is correct, and these elements are in fact a key part of this ancient forgotten Gospel, then the Course itself also deserves a second (and third) reading. Or is Leloup only "finding" these themes in the strange Coptic text, the way one "finds" shapes in Rorshach inkblots? Without a working knowledge of Coptic, it's difficult to tell, of course. But Leloup certainly makes a strong case that the Gospel of Philip was shockingly different from any of the canonical Gospels, and even from the (much earlier, Leloup believes) Gospel of Thomas. What is really needed, but what we will likely never have, is a Gnostic Skeleton Key text, a Gnostic Rosetta, to provide the background theoretical framework (possibly Jesus' own, or a derivation of His teachings, it is true), without which the text is almost hopelessly strange and seemingly garbled. (Ancient Gnostics, no doubt, would be proud of the opacity of the Gospel, which only the Enlightened Ones would be able to make sense of).

This is not to say that, in Leloup's hands, the Gospel of Phiip does not have moments of numinous beauty and clarity as breathtaking as anything in the Gospel of Thomas. "God is a dyer;/ The good dyes, known as genuine,/ become one with the materials they permeate./ This is how God acts." (p. 73, ll. 43-46) (And even here, what is the gratitous "known as genuine" tag doing there?) And, "Humanity is the food of God" (p. 79, l. 50). What a strange notion. Again, "In the beginning, God created humans;/ then humans created god." (p. 115, ll. 94-95). And a masterful sermonette on the need for God's teachers to accord their message to their listeners: "There are many animals in the world who appear in human form;/ the wise one gives acorns to pigs, barley, hay, and grass to livestock, bones to dogs,/ to servants he gives basic lessons;/ and to his children, the teaching in its entirety." Where do the canonical Gospels fit in this hierarchy, one wonders.

Did Jesus really say these things? Hard to imagine this, but possible - though the Gospel text does not attribute these to Jesus (only once or twice is Jesus directly quoted). Presumably these are meant rather to be Philip's reflections on what he learned from Jesus. Whichever it is, this is essential reading!

2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:

1.0 out of 5 stars Turning Valentinian fragments into a Sex Gospel?, February 20, 2008

By	Kelly Fleming "Gypsy Goddess" (High Desert) - See all my reviews

The Gospel According to Philip is not exactly a gospel, it is collection of fragments, that have been strung together. It is described as a Valentinian anthology containing some one hundred short excerpts taken from various other works. None of the sources of these excerpts have been indentified. To judge from their style and contents, they were sermons, treatises and philosophical epistles, as well as collected aphorisims or short dialogues with comments. The compiler, place of compilation and purpose of G-A-to-Ph are unknown and possibly Syriac/Coptic in origin. Philip is the only apostle mentioned in the fragments and it may be for this reason that his name is attached to the gospel as though he were the compiler, like that of like a patron saint. Because more than one Valentian theological perspective is represented in Gospel According to Philip, it would be misleading to reconstruct it as a single theological system atributed to Philip.

Perhaps Leloup should get Bentley Layton's translation of Gospel
According to Philip (the real name of the text, Gospel of Philip
is the name of another text that there is only a fragment of, about
Elijah and Lilith) and read the commentary at the beginning of the
text!

Bentley Layton is Professor of Ancient Christian History at Yale
University. He is an internationally recognized authority on gnostic
literature, and has published numerous scholarly eiditions and
commentaries in gnostic scripture. He was a member of the team of
Cariro UNESCO project to publish the Coptic Gnostic Library into
English. He speaks and translates COPTIC Egyptian.

Leloup has a "PHD in transpersonal psychology" from who knows where? Don't bother with this ridiculous book, from a man that has made a sex gospel out of a series of fragments, buy the entire Nag Hammadi Texts from a reputable scholar like Layton or Robinson. This book is nothing but garbage and lies.

4.0 out of 5 stars a good primer to good gnosis, November 18, 2008

By	Clint Kempster "Celtic Breathe" (Mesa, Arizona) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

Phillip I feel has been Leloup's best Commentary to date.. full of gems and things to ruminate on.. Where Mary was well.. a bit embellished.. but had some nuggets.. and Thomas wasn't bad , but there have so many commentaries on Thomas.. and have to admit a couple way better than Leloup's.. though i do give it it's due.. In Phillip Leloups simplicity and insightfulness permeates.. I've had this book for at least a couple years now.. and find something else still, when I pick it up