Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
15 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Fresh, thoughtful and stimulating, March 31, 2005
Rather than argue a thesis, Toop's style is the chase down a thread of meaning via the points at which various thoughts and anecdotes cross over. This perfectly suits the nature of his subject matter- the vast, largely uncharted terrain of non-genre-based music, for which a dominant narrative and vocabulary do not yet exist as with, say, rock 'n roll or classical.
The book meditates on, among other things, the boundary between performer and audience, environmental sound and music, improviser and composer, and the role of digital technology in mediating or enhancing these distinctions.
As a journeyman music writer, critic and musician, Toop has spent a lot of his time travelling. This seems to inform his writing style as he is constantly in motion, moving quickly between personal recollections, excerpts from correspondence with diverse musicians, and lengthy quotes from various topically obscure yet philosophically related texts.
These (non-)random stop-overs make the book a slow read, as the reader is left to do a lot of the piecing together. Yet this is part of the pleasure to be found in Toop's writing- like a brilliant but challenging piece of music, the book offers an experience in which the mind of the reader is engaged as more than just a passive receptor of received ideas and emotion.
|
|
|
9 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
big ideas spoken in a quiet voice, September 30, 2004
Beautiful, challenging and nourishing.
I read this upon its UK release in July and still find myself dwelling upon some of the ideas raised. Reading it challenged me to use my ears afresh, and to think about what music can be.
|
|
|
2 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Haunted by Pomo Posturing, November 11, 2008
This book was intended as an open-ended exploration of how technology is changing music, but hidden in Toop's meandering style are ridged modernist constructs. Like any book covering experimental music, Haunted Weather makes copious mention of John Cage. Toop gives no convincing reason why contemporary sound art is a step forward. He often mentions the ability of technology to take away intentionality in music making, claiming composers can grow music like watering and feeding plants. Too bad so much of the music produced this way is either artificial enough to render organic metaphors absurd or so indistinguishable from background noise as to not merit attention at all. "The humanistic approach to music is dead" is his reoccurring claim, but having listened to a few of the artists Toop covered, I recommend a bit more humanity their music.
Another claim that doesn't pass muster is that there is an entire world of sound artists that don't fit into standard narratives of genre or history. Toop knows too much about 20th century music to make this statement an honest mistake. He pretends that field recordings and "sound ecology" represent an artistic breakthrough, ignoring the fact the musque concrete artists made compositions of non-musical, pre-recorded sounds decades earlier. In claiming that he has tapped into a brand new type of music, Toop continues the old modernist habit of hiding your influences behind a curtain of originality.
To be fair, Toop's enthusiasm for potential of sound art is real and infectious, but it limits the scope of the book to his own narrow view of how music can change. Technology does have vast potential to aid musical expression, but not within the shackles of academic theory. Computers have revolutionized the recording process, not just for sound art but any number of genres, from classical to rock. Digital editing and auto tuners have brought up real concerns about musicianship and creativity. Sampling, synthesis and sequencing software have fired breakthroughs in ambient, techno, dub and other genres. Haunted Weather could have covered any one of those topics, but Toop choose to use technology to legitimize shop-worn claims of the avant-garde. In putting the cart of ideology in front of the music, he has missed much of what is interesting about digital music.
|
|
|
|