The Sword and the Olive: A Critical History of the Israeli Defense Force (Hardcover)

by Martin L. Van Creveld (Author), Martin Van Creveld (Author) "AT THE BEGINNING of the period covered by this part, the first Jewish self-defense groups, consisting of a few dozen loosely organized, inexperienced, and ill-armed..." (more)
Key Phrases: prestate days, artillery barrels, armored doctrine, Ben Gurion, Tel Aviv, World War (more...)

Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com Review
Renowned defense expert Martin Van Creveld (author of Command in War) offers a comprehensive 20th-century military history of Israel, starting in 1907 with the organization of Jewish settler groups and concluding with the modern day. Much of the focus is on the Israeli Defense Force's glory years, roughly the quarter century from when Israel secured its independence in 1949, through the Six-Day War against Egypt, Jordan, and Syria (and their Soviet advisors) in 1967, to the October War against Egypt and Syria in 1973. Despite being massively outnumbered, Israel won smashing victories each time--and allowed many experts to claim that man for man, no army in the world was tougher than the one Israel put in the field. Van Creveld (himself an Israeli) celebrates these accomplishments, but is extremely critical of what has happened since: He compares Israel's bungled invasion of Lebanon in 1982 to the American experience in the Vietnam War and cites the Israeli military's various shortcomings in confronting the Palestinian Intifada. Morale in the armed forces is now at a low point, writes van Creveld, who disturbingly suggests that his country's apparent military invincibility may be a thing of the past. Whatever one thinks of this claim, few can doubt that The Sword and the Olive is an inspiring portrayal of courage and heroism in the face of overwhelming odds. --John J. Miller

Product Description
A complete history of one of the world's most admired-and most mythologized-fighting forces. AUTHOR COMMENT: "He who fights the weak will end up by becoming weak. He who, fighting the weak, behaves like a coward, will end up by turning into one. This is the central message of The Sword and the Olive; and one which, while using the Israeli Army as its case in point, also applies to the other armed forces of this world and, indeed, to human life in general. . . . This book then, takes a fresh look at the factors which will make men (and women, since Israel is the only country in history to conscript them for military service) either want to or refuse to fight. At the same time, it tells the story of one of the twentieth century's best known, and most admired, armed forces."

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Hardcover: 422 pages
• Publisher: PublicAffairs; 1st edition (September 1998)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1891620053
• ISBN-13: 978-1891620058
• Product Dimensions: 9.6 x 6.4 x 1.5 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.7 pounds
• Average Customer Review: 3.6 out of 5 stars See all reviews (14 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #1,636,307 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

26 of 28 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Contrarian, but valuable., November 3, 1998

By A Customer

Martin Van Creveld is a contrarian. This new history of the Israeli Defense Forces (TSAHAL) is by turns complimentary and critical. It starts with the development of self defense forces established in Palestine under the Ottomans and continues forward through the British mandate, then through the various wars up through the Intifada. Enough campaign history is provided to buttress the author's criticism and praise of various leaders. While Van Creveld is critical of the amateur (and often vengeful) nature of the early Zionist and Israeli forces, he does credit them for high morale, aggressive leadership, the ability to learn from mistakes, and to effectively improvise where needed. For Van Creveld the myth of Israeli invincibility rested on stunning successes and tight censorship that covered up mistakes and would-be mistakes. The fall of the IDF starts with the ill-considered invasion of Lebanon in 1982 and accelerated with the response to the Intifada in the late 1980s. Van Creveld sees the surest sign of IDF failure as the inability to participate in the Gulf War; this criticism is unfair and unrealistic as the Israeli military was not designed to project so much power so far, and any Israeli participation in the Coalition would have broken down the anti-Hussein consensus among the Arab participants. Van Creveld shows that the IDF no longer enjoys the invincible reputation and high status that it did 20 years ago. The book covers many topics : the development of Israel's arms industry, the "tank is king" mentality that was so disasterous at the beginning of the 1973 October War, the effect of Israel's nuclear capability, the entangling of party politics, the rise of the Air Force, the usually marginal nature of the Navy, and the status of women. Two interesting aspects of this book : the not-quite-standard English rendering of Hebrew and Arabic words (Mount Chermon for Mt. Hermon, Beqa Valley for Bekaa Valley) and the frequent citation to popular songs, jokes, and sayings that reflect the public image of the IDF. Highly recommended for anyone interested in the Middle East or in the development of national military systems.

16 of 16 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars The Arms of Zion, February 12, 2005

By	Omer Belsky (Haifa, Israel) - See all my reviews (TOP 1000 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)

This review is from: The Sword and the Olive: A Critical History of the Israeli Defense Force (Paperback)

Detailing the evolution of the Israeli Defence Force from its pre -world war one beginning as a private company of guards (Ha-shomer), through its War of Independence and its "finest hour" in the 1967 Six Day War, and up to the 1990s with its failure to act during the 1991 first Gulf War and first Intifada (1986-1993), "The Sword and the Olive" is a compelling portrait of Israel's army, and, as the IDF is one of Israel's central institution, of the Israeli State and of Israeli society in the 20th century.

A world renowned military historian, Martin van Creveld's book is very well written and highly informed. It covers the military, social and economic aspects of the IDF, touching on almost everything, be it the role of nuclear weapons in Middle East, gender roles in the IDF (most controversial is van Creveld's thesis postulating an inverse relationship between the role of women in the Army and its prestige p. 361), or the similarities between the IDF's strategy and that of the Whermacht.

I often lament the shortages of maps in Military history books, but van Creveld's book is more offensive then most in this regard, normally there is only one map to each campaign, and I doubt anyone but the initiated can follow van Creveld's description of Israel's wars.

I am no expert in Israeli military history, most of which I gather from reading Israeli newspapers, but I was particularly surprised of van Creveld's assertions that a main motive behind Nasser's commencement of hostilities in the Six Day War was his fear of the Israeli Nuclear program. Van Creveld emerges as a critic of Israel's policy of nuclear policies, arguing that opacity failed to prevent the Six Day war and the Yom Kippur war (pp. 220-221). As a cause for the Six-Day war, van Creveld hardly mentions the internal political consideration of the Arabs, particularly in Egypt (see Michael B. Oren's brilliant "Six Days of War" for a very different perspective).

I never realized how limited the Egyptian military's moves were in the Yom Kippur war (van Creveld always refers to it as 'The October war'). In essence, Israel's maintenance of the Bar-Lev line, on the west bank of the Suez canal, was costly in terms of human life and military material, and made little or no strategic sense. By fighting on the line, Israel subjugated itself to heavy anti-aircraft and anti-tank fire, and this did not enjoy the superiority it had in mobile warfare as in the Six Days war and the 1956 war. Thus Israel utterly failed to take advantage of the strategic qualities of the Sinai desert as a barrier against attack on itself.

The subtitle of "The Sword and the Olive" is "A Critical History", and critical it is. Van Creveld does not spare criticism of the early pre State Israeli forces and personnel, as well as of Israel's army in the first twenty-five years of its existence, blaming Israelis for inciting Syrian fire on its tractors and questioning performances in the Six Day War.

After the 1973 war, though, van Creveld's criticisms become truly devastating. As heads of state, Golda Meir "frankly admit[ed] she did not know exactly what a division was", and Menachem Begin "kept meddling [with army affairs] even though his military knowledge had been acquired during his kindergarten years and barely developed thereafter" (p. 108). Nor is van Creveld kinder to generals: Moshe Dayan "failed to carry his point of view in the Cabinet" and "as usual" "found a way to shift responsibility [for the Bar Lev line] to others" (pp. 211-213). General 'Motta' Gur's "greatest intellectual achievement[s]" were "a series of children's books about Azzit, a heroic shepherd she-dog" (p. 249). The general intellectual poverty of the Israeli high command was manifested in Rafael Eytan "for whom wider cultural horizons simply do not exist" (p. 263).

About the current state of the Israeli army van Creveld doesn't mince words. The state of the Israeli moral is so devastating that the army had to suppress research about it. "In an army that once prided itself on truthfulness, lying has become institutionalized" van Creveld writes (p. 350). Great public outcry about accidents led to a pre-approbation of exercises and to a sharp decrease in the quantity and quality of training (p.349). Indeed, the IDF has become "soft, bloated, frequently undisciplined and undertrained", and although every successive IDF chief of staff has promised to make the army "lean and mean" again, none delivered the promise (p. 318).

Van Creveld has little doubt as to the cause of the malaise: The Occupation and the war against the Palestinians. "War... is an imitative activity in which... the two sides will learn from each other and tend to resemble each other. Thus he who fights the weak will himself become weak, and he who by "fighting" the weak behaves like a coward will end up turning into one" (p.352).

You do not have to agree with every point of van Creveld opinionated study in order to appreciate its knowledge and learning. A Superb source about the IDF, "The Sword and the Olive" is a must read for anyone interested in Israel, the Middle East, or Military history.

13 of 15 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Emphasis on "Critical History", July 29, 2001

By	debbie keiler (bowie, md United States) - See all my reviews

This is a highly engaging book by a very influential Israeli military historian, who having made his reputation addressing other topics, now takes on the IDF. Though the book is a must for anyone with an interest in Middle East military matters, and the IDF in particular, the tone of the book at times is more legal brief than history, as the author presses to complete his thesis. In general, that thesis is that the IDF has been overrated in the past, though it achieved certain heights of glory between 1967 and 1973, and since has been on a rather steady decline. Basically, this is a sound thesis, but pursued too ardently at times. For example, Van Creveld endorses the view put forth by Seymore Hersh that the Syrian offensive on the Golan in 1973 was only halted in the end by Israel "rattling the nuclear saber". ...This is a famous story, much written about, and which produced a number of Israeli heros. To attribute the success of these tankers, whose tactics were much studied and copied by NATO tankers over the years, to a speculative nuclear threat, is a bit much for a historian. There are many more numerous prosiac factors which credibly led to the withdrawal, among them, the fanatic Israeli resistance, the Syrians own heavy losses, the prior commitment of Syria's armored reserve, including the elite Republican Guard, and the effect of IAF interdiction strikes on Syrian supply lines, to name a few. This is not the only example. Van Creveld has virtually nothing positive to say about the 1982 Lebanon campaign, which is already received wisdom in much of Israel and among Israel's critics, and so somewhat tiresome. But his analysis is overly harsh in a purely military history sense. The campaign's early stages were relatively well conducted, though not mistake free, but it is difficult to imagine any other modern army having done better under the circumstances the Israelis faced. This is true regardless of whether the campaign was ultimately was a strategic mistake. As far as further criticism of the book goes I would add that some of the footnotes (the book is heavily footnoted) do not seem to match up to the point being made. This may have something to do with translation problems. The real strength of the book is the last chapters in which Van Creveld takes the IDF to task for undermining its own warrior spirit through Israeli versions of political correctness, overreliance on technology, coddling, etc. Of course, almost everything said could be applied to most modern western armies, and in particular the U.S. Armed Forces. Pretty obviously, the IDF's close links with the U.S. military, which did not realy begin until after the 1973 War, also correlate with the IDF's perceived decline.