Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Crucial addition to the Hill canon, November 28, 2007
Encounters at Indian Head is a must-read for UFO abduction aficionados, but much of it will upset True Believers in the ET hypothesis. Those who are not familiar with the literature will find this too specialized, but for those up on the subject it's a dash of cold water, in a good way. Closely involved with the book are hardcore skeptics like Martin Kottmeyer and Peter Brookesmith. Kottmeyer's piece unflinchingly looks at possible mass media influences on the Hill case. The use of hypnosis is also questioned in this volume. The book is based on an informal, closed-doors conference held in New England as part of a gathering in which Betty Hill herself (now deceased) participated. I'm not sure she would like this book. But since ufology insists on going over its classic cases (like Roswell and this one) again and again and again, this is probably the most useful and dispassionate analysis of "the original UFO abduction" yet.
|
|
|
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Insightful and refreshing, January 17, 2008
This book is an insightful overview of an episode that has been driven by the late Betty Hill's remarkable personality for all these years.
This account is refreshing in its detail, skepticism, and openmindedness. Fans and foes of UFOlogy should embrace this book, for it does what few others have been able to do. This work allows all sides of the story to be told and heard.
|
|
|
4.0 out of 5 stars
A Lively Debate--But Not for the True Believer, June 24, 2009
Nearly everyone has heard of certain events in the "UFO" world: Kevin Arnold. Roswell. Betty and Barney Hill (the first 'abduction' case). Even if the names are unfamiliar, a quick recap of events will spark a light in even the most disinterested person who 'remembers reading about that.'
"Encounters At Indian Head" gathers several prominent UFOlogists/writers and takes the reader through a lively debate regarding not only the nature of the Betty and Barney Hill case (and, by extension, UFO abductions in general), but raises the question 'did it really happen?'
There is a recap of the case with all the salient details, followed by essays by both believers and skeptics alike. Walter Webb, the original investigator of the case is represented here, and helps us relive the novelty and the newness of the case when it first came to light. Karl Pflock, one of the editors of this volume, argues that the Hills were abducted, but there have been none proven since.
The skeptics are well represented here as well. Peter Brookesmith, Robert Sheaffer, and Martin Kottmeyer present the skeptical view that (either) nothing happened or that events were misconstrued. Of the three, Brookesmith is the most thorough in his reasoning, Sheaffer the most condescending, and Kottmeyer the most entertaining. It's worth noting that all three present different points.
One thing that no one disputes is that Betty and Barney Hill truly believed that something had happened, and that this case is not, and has never been, a hoax or an elaborate prank.
By presenting their arguments through the focusing lens of what is widely regarded as the first abduction scenario, the authors present a variety of speculation and argument over the nature of UFOs themselves, of abductions and abductees, and whether or not something is going on. It's to be noted that all of the authors steer clear of folkloric faerie 'abduction' tales and confine themselves strictly to the UFOlogical world. I imagine that's an argument for another book.
I was intrigued throughout, found myself challenging assertions of both the believers and the skeptics. At one point, after quoting Betty Hill's statement that her dreams served to help rationalize her experience, Kottmeyer asks 'Dreams as rationalizations! Am I the only person who feels this is simply bizarre?' Well, yes, maybe you are. Dreams serve to filter the subconscious and often help us deal with stress by presenting events in a way we can deal with. I'd say that dreams can and do serve as rationalizations. However, that's not to say that Kottmeyer's contribution doesn't make a number of strong points regarding the role of culture in these abduction scenarios. I'm simply illustrating one of my reactions to his essay. (As I stated above, some of the believers caused me to arch an eyebrow more than once.)
In the end, what seems to be agreed upon is that something happened.
"Encounters At Indian Head" is an excellent review not just of the Hill case, but of abduction in general and the arguments that surround it.
Fascinating.
|
|
|
|