Product Details

• Actors: Nude Aerobics 2
• Directors: A Brand New Super Sexy Workout!
• Format: Color, NTSC
• Rating: X (Mature Audiences Only)
• Number of tapes: 1
• Studio: Woodhaven Ent
• VHS Release Date: March 21, 2000
• Run Time: 51 minutes
• Average Customer Review: 3.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (8 customer reviews)
• ASIN: 6305524025
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #25,802 in Video (See Bestsellers in Video)

  Popular in this category: (What's this?)

  #96 in

  Video > Fitness > Aerobics

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

42 of 47 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars 5 nude women do "gym-class-type" exercises, April 10, 2000

By A Customer

This tape was made in 1992 by EDDE Entertainment (it is not aRon Harris series tape). The tape is recorded at the 2-hour SPStandard Play speed, but it has a shot-on-analog-video quality. If it were shot on film or on digital video, the picture quality would have been a little better, but overall it is still worth a look. There are 5 girls, and 4 of them have natural breasts. They are not perfect 10's, but I liked 3 out of 5 of them. The genitalia shots are not XXX, but are worth a look. The five nude women expose everything while doing simple exercises, exercises like what girls do in gym class (not energetic super-aerobics). For example....they lay on their side with one of their legs high in the air (leg lifts?). Shots are mostly frontal, so if you like mostly rears, don't but the tape. I would have liked to have seen more high impact aerobics, so that there would have been more breast bounce. More rear wiggle would have helped too. Most of the movements were slow, just moving the arms or legs (no jogging or jumping-jacks-type of bouncing). This tape is not an instructional aerobics tape, it is erotic T&A. END

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars Yawn, June 18, 2006

By	Michael Fredette (Anaheim, Ca.) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

There are 5 women featured. None totally shaved. The bulk of this was filmed outside which is it's downfall because a lot of what you're looking at is in the shade or in the shadow because the sun is behind them. Lighting very poor. Not enough close ups. I thought the best part was the shower scenes in the end. If I had paid full price for this one I'd be really upset. I ended up fast forwarding through much of it.

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars better than part 3, April 20, 2007

By	D. phillips - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

if your looking for erotic.. this one has more close-ups than part 3.. must have been different photographer or cameraman but same ladies as 3...Some problems with lighting.. they should have used lights or reflectors... My photography is that bad!