Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
67 of 67 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Poor Man's Automatic Sprinkler System, May 18, 2000
We have used one of these for about ten years with great success. The tractor can even follow the hose around gentle 10' radius curves. The little ramp clips on the hose and has a folding ground spike to keep it from slipping. When the tractor reaches the ramp, it pushes a shut off valve on the belly of the tractor. Very simple and effective. Part of our ramp finally snapped off, but it still works. We've never had a problem with the tractor. The adjstable spray wands allow you to regulate the size of the area covered. I suppose it can drag about forty feet of hose before it slows it down. That probably will vary depending on the depth and density of your turf and how straight the path is. You won't be disappointed; this is a time-tested classic!
|
|
|
74 of 76 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Flexible and effective way to water your lawn, July 11, 2000
After hearing so much about this unit, and seeing a couple of them in my neighborhood, I decided to give it a try, even though the price was higher than I ever expected to pay for a lawn sprinkler.I now know why so many people like it. It is very effective in watering the lawn, without spraying water high up in the air (less chance for evaporation, and not affected by wind as much), and it has hands-off operation once you set it up. Adjusting the spray diameter is easy, and using the hose as a way to set the travel path for the sprinkler to follow is a great idea. The adjustable speed allows you to decide how much water to apply and how much ground you want to cover in a period of time. Inspecting the yard afterwards shows that the ground is nicely saturated, and not needing to go out and move hoses is a welcomed change. This sprinkler is worth the purchase price!
|
|
|
83 of 86 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Fun and functional, but a lot of work, July 3, 2007
I've had my Raintrain for a little over a year now. I was initially very enthusiastic about it, but over time, I grew less satisfied with it.
Pros:
>For some reason, it's mesmerizing to watch. After I get it set up, I always watch for a few moments to make sure the water throw is adjusted properly, and then I find myself watching it longer than necessary. There's just something cool and relaxing about how the arms spin and the wheels turn and how it slowly moves along. From talking to some other people who own this and similar products, "sprinkler watching" seems to be a common phenomenon.
>The coarse spray is ideal for use in windy areas. You'll get a lot less drift and evaporation using this than you would with a finer-droplet sprinkler.
>The adjustability is impressive. I have a long, 4-foot swatch of grass that would be difficult to water with most other sprinklers, but on the Raintrain, I can point the arms way down and keep the water where I want it. But I can also point the arms way up and throw the water for at least 50 feet.
>It's quiet. The only sound it makes is the water hitting the grass.
>The shut-off feature is very handy and worked quite well (initially).
>It stands up well to neglect. I left both my sprinkler and the stop block sitting outside in the sun and snow all winter, and come spring, they seemed no worse for wear. Also, you are supposed to disconnect the sprinkler and let it drain after each use, and I've never done that, with no apparent effect yet.
Cons:
>This thing is really heavy, as it needs to be, but when you're hauling it out to the north forty (okay, the back of a 6500-square-foot lawn), it's a little cumbersome.
>The hose connection is awkwardly placed. It's in the somewhat narrow space at the back between the wheels, so I find it a little difficult to get a good grip on the connector. There are also two inexplicable protrusions in the body of the sprinkler right next to the connector, and this makes it even harder to grip. This is why I never drain my sprinkler like I'm supposed to; I hate connecting it.
>The connector always leaks, even after I put in a gasket, and the hose sometimes loosens while it's traveling.
>Getting the water to throw just the right distance is a pain. You have to turn on the water, see where it's throwing, turn it off, walk out to the sprinkler, adjust the arms, walk back to the faucet, turn it on, see if that's right, and then repeat until you have it where you want it, which might involve several tries.
>The water is thrown in a circle, but only to the outside of the circle. This is easily seen if you have the sprinkler set where it will be thrown on concrete. You can see the arc of the circle and the dry area inside it. The way the Raintrain gets all the ground covered is by advancing this outline through the yard. For this reason, the stationary setting on the sprinkler is useless. It will water the outline of the circle only.
>Because of the circle outline problem, the area at the beginning and end of the course will get half as much water as the rest of the yard (the beginning of the course will only be hit by the trailing edge of the circle, and the end of the course will only be hit by the front edge). To compensate for this, I turn off the water, pick up the Raintrain, and move it back at both the beginning and end so that the areas get covered by the half circle twice. This creates a lot of extra work for what I was hoping would be a labor-saver.
>I found that the Raintrain doesn't deliver nearly as much water as it says it will. The farther you throw the water, the less depth of water you'll put out (because the same amount of water is being spread out over a bigger area), but when I had the arms adjusted for a pretty narrow path, I only measured about a quarter inch of water (even on "low gear," which makes it travel more slowly). This likely explains why I've struggled so much with keeping my lawn green since I got the Raintrain. With stationary sprinklers, you can leave them running as long as necessary to achieve the water delivery you need. But with the Raintrain, if you need more water than it delivers, your only option is to lay out the hose again and start it over, which is a lot of extra work.
>While the sprinkler seems overall pretty solid and durable, I knocked a big chip of paint off the "nose" when I set it up on end to attach the hose, and the bare spot rusted immediately.
>Laying out the hose for a straight line is simple, but if you want to do any curves, it takes a lot of practice and trial and error to create a path that won't make the Raintrain "jump the track." The tightness of curve it can handle depends on several factors, such as the height and density of the grass, the softness of the ground, and any small bits of yard debris the wheels might go over.
>The stop valve on the underside (which is triggered by the stop block) stopped working on mine during its second season. Now when it runs over the stop block, it slows down, and the arms start turning more slowly, but it doesn't actually stop. This greatly reduced the handiness of the Raintrain for me.
Overall, this is a fun sprinkler, and it has its uses, but I've decided to try something else this summer. The Raintrain is just too cumbersome and time-consuming to set up for my particular needs.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|
