Product Details

• Actors: Charles Dance, Diana Rigg, Geraldine James, Jean Anderson, Emilia Fox
• Directors: Jim O'Brien
• Writers: Arthur Hopcraft, Daphne Du Maurier
• Producers: Andrew Warren, Hilary Heath, Jonathan Powell, Rebecca Eaton, Rikolt von Gagern
• Format: Closed-captioned, Color, Original recording reissued, NTSC
• Language: English
• Rated: NR (Not Rated)
• Number of tapes: 2
• Studio: Wgbh Boston
• VHS Release Date: June 26, 2001
• Run Time: 176 minutes
• Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (43 customer reviews)
• ASIN: B00005JHBQ
• Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #52,711 in Video (See Top 100 in Video)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

26 of 31 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Classic book adaptation and movie remake, September 3, 2002

By	Joan Monica Wanat "ua1vm" (Wheeling, IL USA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

This review is from: Rebecca (1997) (2pc) [VHS] (VHS Tape)

While I will always like the Hitchcock film better, this adaptation is a great example of how a book should be turned into a movie. This will always be a classic love story between a young woman and an older mysterious widower that changes and matures with tragedy and the revelation of secrets. As with the originial film, this movie is suspenseful, romantic, and tragic. This faithful adapation from the book expands on issues that were skimmed over in the orginial movie but should have been filmed in black and white. In the new adaptation, the feelings between Maxim and the new Mrs. de Winter are underscored with some blatant scenes where they are still laying in bed and with more dubtle touches, such as holding hands when they walk or when Maxin touches Mrs. de W's face while in conversation. However, Lawrence Olivier somehow portrayed a more tragic and angry Maxim than is seen in this version.

48 of 62 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Not Du Maurier and Not On Par With Hitchcock, January 15, 2003

By	Diana F. Von Behren "reneofc" (Kenner, LA USA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

This review is from: Rebecca [VHS] (VHS Tape)

When I first heard of this production on PBS's Masterpiece Theatre, I was thrilled with anticipation regarding how it would be played. Would it rival Hitchcock's masterpiece? Would it be marketed as a romantic escape?

Unfortunately, althought this version of Du Maurier's classic follows the book very closely and is over 2 hours longer than the original 1940s film, it just doesn't measure up to either Hitchcock or the book. Hitchcock downplays Du Maurier's portrayal of the strange relationship between men and women. Men are omnipotent---women, merely serve. Rebecca, too strong must go. Hitchcock plays up the Gothic touches with fog, music and a weakly played Max De Winter. The nameless heroine gathers strength as Rebecca is revealed to be intrinsically evil. But this is not Du Maurier's 'Rebecca'. In the book there is no win in the ending---the heroine simply remains a caretaker as she was in the beginning of the novel; her charge has changed from Mrs. Van Hopper to Maxim. The couple drifts like sad wanderers from place to place; as Du Maurier puts it, "There is no resurrection." In this adaptation and in Hitchcock, love seems to conquer all---an idea completely alien and misunderstood by most readers of Du Maurier.

First and foremost, the girl playing the narrator is not gauche or dependent enough--she has too much spunk and sparkle lurking behind the lank hair and the school girl dresses. Fontaine was ever so much more desperate to please as I think Du Maurier's heroine was meant to be. Du Maurier doesn't even give her a name. Dame Diana Rigg is an equally austere Mrs Danvers, but her portrayal is much too sad, not malicious enough and definitely suggests a [physical] attraction to her former mistress which seems mournful rather than simply obsessive like DuMaurier's character in the novel or Dame Anderson's character in Hitchcock's film. Charles Dance is not as taut nerved as Olivier, but he passes as an okay Max DeWinter with perhaps a third of Olivier's charm. Still, he comes off as weak as does Olivier in Hitchcock's version---neither fully portraying the strong silent brooding character of Maxim in the book. Lastly, giving Rebecca a voice and a body, is a mistake. Du Maurier's book is so compelling simply because we don't know anything about Rebecca and hence can envision whatever femme fatale we choose--the real Rebecca is a ghost; she remains a mystery to the very end--we don't know if she is really malevolent---we only have Maxim's word--or excuse for his own violent actions. We don't even understand her motives fully even after the production moves to the final scene at Manderley.

Nevertheless, if you simply love everything 'Rebecca', you will at least like this version, but, I guarantee it will provoke you to find a copy of the Hitchcock version at your local rental store or better yet a worn copy of the book at your library!

12 of 14 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars The only good thing about this is that they got the time period right unlike the movie, April 10, 2006

By	Barbara L. Timmer "Nightsky Weaverwombon" (Cincinnati, Ohio United States) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

This review is from: Rebecca (DVD)

Like everybody else who has ever read the mistresswork Rebecca I find all the characters unforgettable, from the second Mrs. DeWinter to Rebecca herself. The haunting, elusive, enigmatic beatuy. Who was the real Rebecca, angel or devil?

I don't think we're meant to know.

Now to get on to a review of this version of Rebecca. It at least has the story taking place in the 1920's as anyone who has read the book knows is actually the time when it took place, and not the late 1930's, as the top-notch Hitchcock movie has it taking place.

Other than that it is not nearly as good as the movie. Diana Rigg is such a good actress and the way she played Mrs. Danvers had none of the truly scary and obsessive qualtity of Judith Anderson's performance. I'm surprised that she did such a poor job of playing Mrs. Danvers.

And the person who played Maxim wasn't very physically attractive. He was much less likable than Olivier in the part, grumpy and bad-tempered, rather than brooding and obsessed as Olivier played him.

And much of the story was changed. The only thing Hitchcock changed in the movie was the fact Maxim killed Rebecca on purpose, and the fact that the second Mrs. DeWinter went to London with Maxim.

In this version Maxim rescues Mrs. Danvers from Manderly as it is burning, there is no mention of anything like that. And then there's the meeting between Mrs. VanHopper, Maxim and the second Mrs. DeWinter that NEVER took place in the book.

Evey though Faye Dunaway is not one of my favorite actresses, I really like her portrayal of Mrs. VanHopper. She brings the sex-obsessed, frustrated, wealthy, unattractive middle-aged woman who has to hire male escorts side of Mrs. VanHopper that was only hinted at in the movie and book out in the open.

This movie doesn't have the haunting, scary, atmosphere of the book or the movie. And the most faithful adaption of Rebecca was one made for PBS years ago. I don't remember who played most of the parts, but Joanna David played the second Mrs. DeWinter and I think Eugenia Massay played Mrs. Danvers very much in the style of Judith Anderson.

What a shame that version was never released on video or DVD.