|
|
14 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Dunno what everyone else is smoking..., July 9, 2003
I saw the theatric release of Down With Love, and I thought it was not only a very good romantic comedy, it was THE romantic comedy. Far too many movies of this genre are bland, w/ terrible acting, and all too familiar of plot lines. So this movie dug back into the beginning of romantic comedies, when the movies hadn't been all warped into a bunch of mindless junk and i think it revived the whole genre. I was very shocked to see the loads of lukewarm and down reviews for this movie, because I greatly enjoyed it.As you prolly have already heard, this movie pays homage to the Doris Day/Rock Hudson sex comedies of the 60s. It's not a spoof in any way or a remake; it is simply using the components of movies of that time and reviving it. With stars such as Ewan McGregor and David Hyde Pierce this movie is propelled, and without there performances i think this movie wouldn't have been the same. The plot line is that Catcher Block (Ewan McGregor) is the ladies man, man's man, man about town type of guy, and Renee Zelweger plays Barbara Novak, the feminist author who thinks women should be "Down With Love", not sex, just as men are to get themselves further in the working industry. The book she writes, Down With Love, becomes an international sensation and quickly deteriorates the lives of men, and especially one's like Catcher Block. Block then decides to go under cover and act as the perfect husband material to Novak and prove that all women want love and marriage. With a plot such as this, a lovely furbished 60's set (practically a flashback, feast for the eyes), and the sexual comic humor (which in my opinion is strangely a more innocent type of comedy) I had a laughing good time. As I said before the acting was also another vital thing in this movie, and I thought some of the performances were magnificent. Take Ewan McGregor's for example, without his style of portraying that type of egotistical male, even the work of just his facial expressions, the movie would've been a loss. Also David Hyde Pierce's role as a worry-worted boss who's ridiculously failing to be as suave as Block was wonderfully acted. I found almost all the performances absolutely wonderful (i disagree with the comment about "shallow acting") and the only thing I thought could've been better was Zelwiger. In the film she seemed to over-emphasize the comedy, yet her look was ideal for this film. Yet, that is still nothing that hardly tainted this production. Furthermore this is a must-see film, and it saddens me that so many well respected reviewers gave such poor ratings. The shame of it all is that Fox released it at the worst time possible, on the weekend following the opening of The Matrix. Its initial opening date, April 11th, was for some reason pushed back, and I think if it had been released earlier, it wouldn't have failed at the box office. All I can tell you is that the movie's failure there had nothing to do with the movie itself, but the careless scheduling and promoting of the people at Fox. I thought it was a very entertaining movie, maybe not Oscar material of course, but if you want to see an enjoyable movie at the theaters, then go and get "Down With Love".
|