|
141 of 145 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Best for Fun Food, June 18, 2003
I say "fun" because food should be a pleasure, as well as an exploration of the new and different. One of the great strengths of this magazine is that you can get most of the ingredients without having to visit a particular store somewhere in the depths of New York City. The people creating the recipes are making the effort to make preparing the food easier for American cooks."Coffee table" magazine? I don't think so... "Food and Wine": now that is a magazine more devoted to showing breathless closeups of beautiful food. You can't eat it, and you can't find the ingredients, but it looks lovely. Yes, the photography in Saveur is very nice, but that just enhances the experience for me. I am a former subscriber to a LOT of food magazines. Gourmet lost it when they went PC, and you can never find the very special ingredients they mention, unless you live on a particular street in NYC. F&W already mentioned. Williams/Sonoma had a nice magazine, but now sadly gone. I also like the travel aspect to the articles, which is generally much more "real" travel than you get in other food magazines. As an example, Gourmet will send a reporter to the most expensive hotel/restaurant in Italy, while Saveur will explore the wonderful food and drinks to be found in the Italian countryside. I think the best compliment is that other food magazines are stealing ideas from Saveur, in hopes of grabbing the same audience. A theme shows up in Saveur, only to be repeated a month or two later in Food and Wine. Perfect? No, but Saveur is working on it, having had some ups and downs in the last few years. I think that the patient is recovering nicely at this time (6/03).
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|