Product Details

• Actors: Aidan Gillen, Clinton Kenyon, Craig Kelly, Denise Black, James Foster
• Directors: Menhaj Huda
• Writers: Russell T. Davies
• Producers: Nicola Shindler, Russell T. Davies, Tom Sherry
• Format: Color, DVD, NTSC
• Language: English
• Region: Region 1 (U.S. and Canada only. Read more about DVD formats.)
  
• Number of discs: 1
• Rating: X (Mature Audiences Only)
• Studio: Wolfe Video
• DVD Release Date: September 4, 2001
• Run Time: 90 minutes
• Average Customer Review: 3.8 out of 5 stars See all reviews (12 customer reviews)
• ASIN: B00005O0TD
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #37,828 in Movies & TV (See Bestsellers in Movies & TV)

  Popular in these categories: (What's this?)

  #9 in	Movies & TV > Drama > Television > Queer as Folk
  #39 in	Movies & TV > Gay & Lesbian > Television
  #41 in	Movies & TV > Television > Showtime > All Showtime Titles

• For more information about "Queer as Folk - Series 2 (British TV Series)" visit the Internet Movie Database (IMDb)

• This is item 2 in The Queer as Folk (British) Series.

Editorial Reviews

Product Description
Stuart, Vince and Nathan are back for one last wild, outrageous adventure on Canal Street. But amongst the fabulous nights out, the one-night stands, the clubbing, all is not well. Someone's trying to blackmail Stuart Jones. Stuart is no one's victim. Now he's out for revenge. Big time! As Stuart fights back, Vince is facing a dilemma. Stuart's revenge is taking him on the wrong side of the law, and could even get someone killed. Just when it seems that they might finally get together, Vince thinks Stuart's gone too far. Will Nathan ever get over Stuart? Will Vince ever get his man? Can Stuart ever be stopped? In this witty, exciting drama, only one thing is for sure: No straight person is ever going to call a gay boy "queer" again...

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

42 of 48 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars A Disappointing Follow-Up, October 26, 2001

By	J. Edkin (South Orange, NJ) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

I loved the original Queer as Folk series. Great characters. Interesting plots. Terrific writing and performances. And, although Stuart was a truly reprehensible character, he was fascinating to watch and I believed him. On top of that, as someone who works in the comic book industry professionally and was a Doctor Who fan in my youth, I identified with Vince (perhaps a little too much on too many levels). I was so caught up in the original series on DVD that I watched the last four episodes in one sitting; I found it that compelling.

I couldn't wait to see the follow-up. I have to admit that I came away very disappointed. There were numerous individual scenes that were powerful and/or funny, but they were not bound by a cohesive plot nor by consistent characterization.

If I were to sum it up in one quick explanation, I would say it suffers from the "Broadway Damage" syndrome. ("Broadway Damage" is a gay romantic comedy which is a flawed movie that I still enjoy. The biggest problem is that the movie has the ending that the audience wants it to have, but does not make sense in the context of the characters as they are presented. "Free Enterprise" suffers from a similar problem.) In this case, the movie has the ending that I think the author thought the audience would want, but to be honest, I thought it was wrong on many levels. (Or, perhaps it's the ending the author wanted it to have, but didn't know how to get there in a believable way.)

I should also note that the blurb on the back of the DVD packaging paints a much different picture of the contents than is what is actually contained in the 90 minute movie. The description makes the movie sound like a suspenseful thriller, which it is not. The blackmail plot, while one of the more interesting elements, is merely a subplot that totals maybe eight minutes of screen time. And the whole "Stuart crossing the law for revenge" element is not anything like it sounds, and does NOT tie into the blackmail plot directly. (Such as it is, it's also not one of the more believable elements, either.)

I find it curious that writer Russell T. Davies, who created such rich, interesting, and believable characters for the first series could undermine them so thoroughly in the follow-up. Not only does Stuart spin completely out of control to the point of being unbelievable even in the context of Stuart (his whole "revenge" plot doesn't make much sense in terms of his character. His motivation is murky at best, and I didn't buy it at all). Hazel and Bernie stoop to illegal activities in order to help Vince in what I believe was intended to be a humorous side story, but only succeeded in undermining their characters. Nathan shows brief glimpses of a working brain, but remains more dedicated to his reproductive organs (which is in keeping with his character, so I can't object to this). And Vince--well, he doesn't seem to learn anything. Every time it would appear that he has finally grown up and realized that his obsession with Stuart is unhealthy and counterproductive, he immediately caves in and goes back to being whipping boy/lap dog. It all leads to a conclusion that I didn't like nor believe.

The cast remains charismatic, in spite of the material with which they are given to work. The direction is solid. The sheer filmmaking of the final scene in Manchester was visually interesting (although I kept wanting to hear the sound of Doctor Who's TARDIS in order to tie the images together with Vince's character, but alas, such was not to be. At least that would have tied elements together, although how many people outside of the UK would have understood that reference is questionable). The editing was solid. Locations well chosen (although I'm not convinced they used the same set for Stuart's apartment. It didn't look the same to me. I did miss seeing Vince's home. He was defined only by his job in this installment). All in all, a well produced movie, but at its core is a script that doesn't quite work. Too bad, really.

Stick to the original. A great investment of time and money. Rent the follow up first to be sure you want to purchase it.

30 of 37 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars It doesn't get better than this, full stop, August 30, 2001

By	"jdfusa" (texas USA) - See all my reviews

This is the best and most faithful depiction of gay characters you will ever see on television, full stop (to use the Brit's slang from the film).
Writer Russell T Davies knows the gay life and how to express it in a very unpolitical way. Russell got it right in his writing. The actors, directors, editors, sound, etc. hit the mark to make a glossy, polished TV show.
Forget the stretch it to the limit, superficial, they-missed-the-entire-point American Showtime version; this is the real deal. Don't get me wrong, the Showtime version is good, (I love Debbie (Sharon Gless)) but it has much more violence, with more sex and moves at a dull pace when you put it up against the British version.
Gay or straight, if you're not infuriated, saddened, moved or provoked by this show, you'd better check and see if you have assumed room temperature.
I found added insight to the series when I read the scripts
(amazon.uk) and viewed the documentary "The Boys of Manchester" on VHS tape.
Series 2, the finial episode is somewhat darker then the first series and the ending, WOW what an ending. You got to see it for yourself. Best money I ever spent. I'll be watching these DVD disks for years. (This text refers to the widescreen version series 1 & 2 from the UK.)

6 of 7 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars I held my breath..., April 10, 2002

By	D. L. Paulson (Chicago, IL USA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

I found myself holding my breath at times during this final part of the series. The story line is bold, quite disturbing at times, even alarming. It's not happily ever after. But I LOVED IT. I couldn't believe how exciting it was. It's not what you expect. If you want a gushy love story, go back and read Gordon Merrick. This, however, may shake you up a bit.