|
132 of 136 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Great product for ver. 1.0, but needs some improvements, February 28, 2003
I've been using intensely Adobe Photoshop Album for about a week now, and I squeezed it as much as possible (even obtained some access violation faults with sudden stop of the program). I am very pleased with the program, and I will gladly list the reasons for that:1. It focuses on stability over features - this product, unlike many others, doesn't give up quality by masquerading a miriad of creepy features inserted just to steal attention (and money) from consumers (but features that don't work well). Adobe Photoshop Album is not a "feature rich" product, but it exhibits an amazing stability for version 1. 2. It is reliable - although not completely bug free (as I said, I was able to make it stop suddenly), it is designed in such a way that you don't lose your work if it stops unexpectedly. Perhaps they save the data after each change; if they do so, they do it with amazing speed - practically seamlessly. 3. It is easy to use - you don't need the manual (which is very basic in explanations). The interface speaks for itself, and everything is under the tip of the mouse pointer. 4. Tagging, searching and sorting is hugely intuitive. The program has some basic tag categories: People, Places, Events and Others. Do you have a new picture and don't know how to tag it? Just look at it and describe it in plain English. You did 90% of the tagging task - without even knowing. Example: "Granny is watering the flowers in the garden". Then you should tag it with: Granny (category People), Garden (category Places), Watering (category Events), Flowers (category Other). As simple as emitting sentences while speaking: subject-verb-object/adverbs. Even a child can do it! If the product is so good, why do I give it only 4 stars? Well, here are the CONs: 1. The automatic sychronization features are inexistent. You *must* use only Adobe Album to manage your photos. If you don't do it, then you may mess up your catalog - without much smart help from Adobe Album. Example: you install Adobe Album and scan your hard drives. You realize that you have a whole bunch of duplicates (probably produced by some other software). You decide to remove the duplicates - but the dups remain in Adobe Album catalog, and there's no batch way to remove them from there. Detecting the dups/mismatched entries in the catalog is not automized at all, and this may be a paintakingly difficult process. If you go to Windows Explorer and remove by hand then you enter another problem: the catalog doesn't synchoronize automatically. Built-in batch support is only for moving photos, but not for deleting. 2. The program is not very versatile when it comes to tags - it keeps them by name only (not by name/category), and moving tags around between categories is quite impossible if you have duplicates. You simply must renounce to one of them - losing all you tagging work with one of the dupes. 3. The slide-show creation feature is primitive and very limiting: only three frame templates are presented, none of them fills the whole TV screen, and the duration of each photos can be only one of 3 pre-set values. Moreover, the photos must be above a certain (unspecified) resolution. If you choose below that, you are warned about it but not told about what may happen: the programs simply refuses to produce the VCD without a reasonable explanation (you have to figure out yourself that the low resolution is the cause). 4. The program is limited in producing generic slide-shows reusable by other applications (not many applications know how to use PDF-based sildeshow that Adobe Album produces). Let's say I want to select some photos, then produce a slide-show (like a little movie) that I want to include with some DVD-authoring software into a composite home DVD (containing home movies and home slide shows). I cannot do that: I must make my selection in Adobe Album, then export the selection as bare JPGs into some directory, then grab my selection from there. Such a waste of steps and disk space! 5. The online help - needed for more unusual tasks - is not very rich and it's sometwhat counter-intuitive. You put some effort into finding what you need. To summarize: because Adobe Photoshop Album is such a great piece of software but with problems in terms of photo output and integration with other software, I consider a 4 star rating is appropriate.
|