|
|
15 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Lucky you, here's a great movie, March 16, 2001
Having just finished reading (and reviewing) the book "Nobody's Fool", I had an itch to see the movie again. I remembered it as a warm (an odd adjective considering the snowy setting) and heartbreaking comedy about a man down on his luck, but not down on life. I remembered right.But that description does not do justice to this fine piece of work. Sure, being familiar with the source material, which provides an abundance of background information on the characters, helps. But it is not required reading. For in watching the film again, I realized that it gives you all the information that you need. Not with pages of prosaic exposition, but with a wink, a glance, a grin, and most telling, a sparkle in the eye. The four gestures noted above could come from anyone. But if you're going to do it right, why not go for the best. Paul Newman is perfectly cast as Donald "Sully" Sullivan. He has the combined capacity for the man's dry wit, quick tongue, and emotional sincerity, rolled up in a rugged but worn exterior that's not afraid to show hurt (be it physical or emotional). It's a no-brainer to say that he does a wicked job here. The real questions come with the rest of the cast. They are a hit-or-miss bunch. The "hits" include: Gene Saks (who directed "The Odd Couple", among other movies) as the one-legged attorney who sticks by Sully even though he knows that they make a losing pair; Pruitt Taylor Vince as sidekick Rub, who doesn't come off as pathetic as the character did in the book (how could he!) but pulls of with aplomb his simpleness and his endearing nature; Jessica Tandy as landlady Miss Beryl, who died postproduction and who the film is justifiably dedicated to; and even Bruce Willis, who's smug act I've tired of lately, gamely holds his own in his scenes with Newman. The "misses" include: Dylan Walsh as Sully's son (my antipathy towards his performance may come from the fact that Peter was a darker and smarter character in the book, more akin to his old man; Walsh's Peter is more of a bland young man not fully formed yet); and Melanie Griffith, as the prettiest (and most put-upon) girl in town, is caught once or twice delivering her lines rather than inhabiting her character while she speaks, a sin amplified when compared to Newman's perfect ease of speech. Thankfully, neither of these sub-par performance harmed the film's overall effect in any way. Director/Writer Robert Benton does a fine job of collating Richard Russo's novel into a cohesive movie. The novel, if filmed as is, would have been several days long; there is so much depth and texture there. Benton manages to combine some storylines, excise others that weren't really needed, and still maintain the tone and flavour of the book. In my estimation, what was a monumental task feels like it was pulled off with relative ease. I know that's not the case, that hard work went into the story's deconstruction, but am glad as a member of the audience that it appears that way. Just like it's source, "Nobody's Fool" made me laugh out loud on several occasions, tear up on several others, and the rest of the time left me with a happy grin, in awe at what I was seeing.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you?
|
|
|
|