Symantec AntiVirus 2004 Professional Edition with Personal Firewall 2004 Promo Bundle

Other products by Symantec

Product Details

• Shipping Weight: 12.2 ounces
• ASIN: B0000DBIHV
• Date first available at Amazon.com: September 16, 2003
• Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #5,900 in Software (See Bestsellers in Software)

  Popular in this category: (What's this?)

  #20 in

  Software > Networking > Firewalls

Product Description

Product Description
Symantec AntiVirus 2004 Professional Edition with Personal Firewall 2004 Promo Bundle . Symantec's Norton AntiVirus 2004 Professional is the world's most trusted antivirus solution with advanced protection. It protects email, instant messages, and other files by removing viruses automatically. Expanded threat detection alerts you to spyware and similar hacking programs. You also get advanced tools for data recovery and secure file deletion.

Norton AntiVirus 2004 Professional Edition Features:

• Silently dels and quarantines malicious code, for added convenience while you work
  
• Newly-expanded threat categories protect your machine from newer problems like adware, dialers, joke programs, remote access, and hack tools
  
• New data recovery tools to restore accidental deletions and fix any virus damage
  
• Data cleaners eliminate all traces of unneeded or confidential files
  
• Script-blocking and email scanning for outbound and oncoming mail, and advanced Worm Blocking tools, updd Script Blocking heuristics technologies to cover all the bases

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Way Better Than Trend Micro PC-Cillin, March 7, 2005

By	Ex Trend User (USA) - See all my reviews

I was using Trend Micro PC-Cillin and kept having viruses. I could not figure out why until I read an article in PC World that told that Trend does not detect or remove spyware/adware. Knowing that viruses can come in with spyware/adware I realized that my problem was in part the protection I bought. Taking a friend's advice who sets up computer systems and networks them for a living I bought the stand alone Norton Bundle of Anti Virus and Personal Firewall. I must say I have never been more pleased than I have with Norton. It has kept me protected solidly and I feel it was worth every penny and do not forsee ever switching again. Being told by a co worker i was not smart to have switched from Trend I decided to double check some of Norton's scan reports by doing the free scan at the trend site and the program that before was telling me i had all these viruses was now backing up what Norton told me and saying i was totally clean. Go figure. It might be not as easy to install or use as Trend claims to be but when you want computer protection you want SOLID protection not just the easiest thing to use.

21 of 41 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars It's great if you keep it updated..., February 6, 2004

By	tomfromboston - See all my reviews

We use this at work and it is by far the best antivirus program out there. At home, I use the Macintosh version. The best I can say is that there are so many virii on the Window's platform you'd be silly not to have something like this installed. If you're tired of virii, worms, trojans, spyware, etc..., there is another solution. Get a Mac. The piece of mind you get knowing that the operating system is nearly impossible to infect or crack outweighs the tiny learning curve in switching to a different operating system. How many virii have I gotten at my Mac at home in the last 6 months? Zero. How many at work? At least one a week via email. Even our CIO (Information officer) is putting in a proposal as I write this to migrate the entire server and desktop system to the Mac OS X platform, and we're a fortune 500 company. The money saved alone in downtime from systems getting infected (if you can't work, you can't produce!), more than pays for the minor expense of making the switch. NAV is good. But unless you keep your virus definitions up to date, you're asking for a heap of trouble. And how many users really take the time to update their definitions even when the program prompts them to do so? I can count them on one hand.