Get it for less! Order it used
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
 
SeaLife SharkDiver SL301 Underwater Pre-loaded Camera
 
See larger image
 

SeaLife SharkDiver SL301 Underwater Pre-loaded Camera

Other products by SeaLife
1.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (10 customer reviews) More about this product


Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
Request this item from another seller.


Technical Details

  • Underwater 35 mm camera with film
  • Dive tested to 80 feet
  • Manual Film Advance
  • Automatic & Manual flash activation
  • Pre-loaded with ISO 400 27 exposure roll of film
  See more technical details

Product Details

  • Product Dimensions: 9.4 x 7.3 x 2.1 inches ; 1.5 pounds
  • Shipping Weight: 1 pounds
  • Shipping: This item is also available for shipping to select countries outside the U.S.
  • ASIN: B0000W45AE
  • Item model number: SL301
  • Average Customer Review: 1.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (10 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.com Sales Rank: #10,149 in Camera & Photo (See Bestsellers in Camera & Photo)
  • Date first available at Amazon.com: May 27, 2006

Product Description

Product Description

The Sealife Sharkdiver SL 301 underwater 35mm camera comes pre-loaded with a 27 exposure roll of ISO 400 film. It featurs a ruggedized housing depth tested to 80 feet. The camera features manual film advance with Automatic & Manual Flash Activation. Case grip is rubber armored for secure use while snorkeling or diving. Tough LEXAN housing with "O" ring seal keeps out water. The hinge features extra strength for loading and unloading film.

Tag this product

 (What's this?)
Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items.
Your tags: Add your first tag
 

 

Customer Reviews

Average Customer Rating
1.4 out of 5 stars (10 customer reviews)
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (9)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
16 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Horrible, September 17, 2004
By W. Smith (Oregon, USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
For my honeymoon, I purchased this camera for scuba diving photos (because of its flash) and 2 cheaper Kodak disposables without flash for beach and snorkeling pictures. The SharkDiver camera was horrible. The film advance was difficult to turn, the shutter was hard to push down, the flash didn't always function, and on and on. Then, worst of all, the casing apparently leaked and after going to all that trouble to take a full roll of pictures, we ended up with 4 discolored, double exposed pictures and none of the others came out at all. On the pictures we did get, the use of the flash didn't seem to matter at all -- they were still pretty dark.
The Kodak cameras by comparison were great. They were easy to use and produced good pictures in spite of not having a flash. I used them on several pictures at ~20-25 feet under and had plenty of natural light for a good picture.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
16 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Don't waste your money, September 3, 2004
By John E. Crellin "Scuba/Soccer" (Wexford, PA United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
I was looking for an inexpensive camera with a flash for SCUBA diving. Believe it or not a $9 camera from kodak that you can get at walmart but doesnot have a flash is BETTER than this one.
First, instructions are horrible. they do not exist. The package doesn't tell you to turn in the whole camera (minus the plastic shell) to the developer. the inside camera is a "disposable" and you are required to buy another one. Ritz camera had the refills for 9.99.
Second, the flash only worked part of the time and the shutter button sometime pressed easily and sometimes it didn't.
My only roll of film I took was a complete waste.
Sorry, spend some extra cash and get something better.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars complete loss, December 29, 2004
I bought two of these cameras for my wife and me to take on our holiday scuba trip to the western caribbean. Followed all of the directions and felt like we got some great shots in areas we may not see again. Got home and took the cameras to the photo lab, and not ONE of the photos on either camera came out. Rolls from other underwater cameras came out nicely, but wanted to use the 'shark divers' for our deeper dives...
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

1.0 out of 5 stars not pleased
This was a poorly built camera system. the buttons on the case did not line up with the buttons on the camera.
Published on March 23, 2006 by M. Zanon

1.0 out of 5 stars I wish I had read the other reviews first...
Bought 2 of these in the airport as I left for holiday (because they had a flash which the Kodak ones did not, and advertised themselves to a greater depth). Read more
Published on February 10, 2006 by A. Gibbs

1.0 out of 5 stars Good Luck finding refills for this "reusable" camera
OK pictures for snorkeling but can't find refills that fit it. once you use the last refill you bought with it its a disposable.
Published on January 18, 2006

1.0 out of 5 stars Leakage of Bonica camera case
I had a very bad experience with Bonica Sea Explorer camera , but this might be common for Bonica underwater cameras that have similar housing where two halves are held together... Read more
Published on May 17, 2005 by Evgeny N. Kuznetsov

1.0 out of 5 stars Bloody Thing Leaked
Try a Kodak or Fuji disposable underwater camera.

I particularly like the Fuji. They don't have flashes, so everything looks blue in the pictures, but at least they... Read more
Published on January 30, 2005 by Hey Mo!!

5.0 out of 5 stars Superb for underwater shots
I bought this camera on a whim - knowing that I would be doing a great deal of swimming on vacation.
It worked perfectly and was simple and carefree to use. Read more
Published on January 8, 2005 by Trevor J. Hall

1.0 out of 5 stars Don't Buy it.....Ruined our Tahiti Vacation
Film did not advance and there were vertical stripes on the one roll that did advance and take pics. Don't risk your vacation snorkeling or suba on this camera.
Published on October 22, 2004 by William T. Hauss

Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   



So You'd Like to...

Create a guide

Product Information from the Amapedia Community

Beta (What's this?)


Look for Similar Items by Category

 

Feedback

If you need help or have a question for Customer Service, contact us.
 Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
Is there any other feedback you would like to provide?

Your comments can help make our site better for everyone.



Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.