Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
66 of 69 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A solid value and nothing to scoff at, July 2, 2007
Wide open this lens has some noticeable flaws, but if you force it to using a more closed aperture (say F8), many of those become less apparent. Even if you're forced to shoot wide open or you don't know better, you can correct the aberrations and vignetting in software.
While some prefer the slightly better build of the 18-70mm, I'd take the extra 65mm (close to 100mm on the DSLRs that use these lenses) any day over a distance scale and a metal lens mount. For crying out loud it's an autofocus walk around lens, so distance scales are relics for few people to use and the mount is a moot point, since it will stay on 99% of the time. As for focus speed, it's great. There are faster focusing lenses, but not with a comparable zoom range for the price. Nikon is not a charity, they design sophisticated lenses, build them to high tolerances, and sell them to a loyal following at a fair price. Yes a $1000 lens will be better than a $330 one, and yes a $2500 lens collection will do better than a $330 lens. I should hope so!
Enough of the weaknesses, which plenty of other folks will write about, it is a very good lens. 135mm is about as long of a lens that I would want without VR stabilization, but it works well when there is ample light. Since it's only intended for DSLRs, bumping the ISO is always an option to assure shake free shutter speeds.
Why isn't this a 5* review, well, I can honestly tell you that there are many people with defective lenses in need of repair/replacement. I believe those issues have been fixed, but it's not a good circumstance. I recommend that you be sure to buy a genuine US copy with a full warranty--don't fall for any extended warranty though, as it's got a generous 5 years from Nikon. Being to 'po boy I am, I opted for one of those refurbished ones, hoping it was a unit that was returned by someone expecting a perfect lens at a bargain price, and a double check by Nikon assured that it is and likely will always be fully functional. No regrets thus far.
|
|
|
48 of 52 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Good, but not excellent, May 24, 2007
I'm a hobbiest/enthusiast not a professional, yet I've taken the time to learn terms like vignette, bokeh and about pincushion/barrel lens effect. The 18-135mm DX Nikkor lens suffers from all of them. If you're not a perfectionist or professional, then you will certainly not be disappointed by this utilitarian starter lens. If you expect to take your photography to "the next level" then this lens will quickly become a paperweight not worthy of space in your camera bag. ---
First, I've noticed vignetting (i.e., a slight darkening of the corners) at "extreme zoom" (135mm zoom). It's most noticible on skylines and photos of airborne objects. ---
Second, I've noticed slight pincushioning (the inverse of a fish-eye lens, everything is pulled towards the center of the photo, destroying square lines) at almost all zoom settings. ---
Third, the Bokeh (blur) is bad bokeh. Typically, photographers consider good bokeh to be that which is brightest in the center and gradually fades towards the edges until it merges with the blurred background. The 18-135mm lens suffers from bad bokeh, which is the blur highlight is on the edge of the blur. While this might be what you want for some artistic reason, it makes small light sources that blur in your background really stand out and detract from professional grade photographs. ---
Lastly, if you do any night shots, macro/close-up work or want to do any extended shutter photography, you will find that the lack of image stabilization (or vibration reduction as Nikon calls it) will drive you to purchase another lens quickly... unless you can work with tripod for all of your shots. ---
However, I've not suffered from any of the auto-focus issues that other customers have (although it doesn't focus well in darkness, this is not the lens's fault and there are solutions outside of the lens to solve this problem), nor have I had any defects in my lens. The photos are sharp (other than the above problems), but I have not had a chance to test (nor will I intentionally experiment with) durability. I've taken my 18-135mm on several "vacation" style outings and snapped well over 1000 shots in the first 3 weeks I owned my D80 w/ 18-135mm Nikkor Zoom lens. --- Already I'm upgrading to the 18-200mm Nikkor Zoom lens with VR. --- I wish I had not purchased this lens as part of my kit, but it has been good to me.
In summary, the 18-135mm Nikkor zoom-lens is an excellent beginner lens, but if you are a perfectionist (or professional) you would be better served to avoid purchasing the 18-135mm as part of your starter kit.
|
|
|
42 of 46 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Sharp glass, but slow AF, poor distortion, and significant light fall-off., December 9, 2006
The title says it all. I bought the lens because the glass is sharp, the focal length is handy, and it is lightweight and easy to use. But the light fall-off in the corners is significant unless you stop-down every shot. You'll see visible distortion at any focal length on the zoom - over 1% barrel distortion on the wide end and pincussion on the long end. The auto-focus is slow and tends to hunt, even in medium light. I wish the focus ring had distance markings, but at least I can override the AF-S with a turn of the focus knob. I plan on keeping the lens, but I am disappointed in the results. Let's just say this lens is a slight improvement over the mediocre 18-55mm kit lens.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|
Saving...
