|
24 of 25 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Caveat Emptor--Elvis Live? Not As Good As It Could Have Been, July 10, 2001
caveat emp·tor (mptôr) n. The axiom or principle in commerce that the buyer alone is responsible for assessing the quality of a purchase before buying.Read the review. Be warned. Disc 1. August 24, 1969 Dinner Show. This should have been the killer, as this is from Elvis first season comeback in Vegas. But it falls flat. RCA has better, more exciting, more explosive live performances from 69 (such as the Aug 23). Again, with CD 1 of the Vegas Box, we have Dennis Ferrante's infamous "selective-revisionist instrument-exclusion syndrome." This is the process whereby Ferrante decides to delete certain instruments from the mix, such as a piano, as if they were never part of the original show! Ferrante doesn't give you the show as it happened, but rather, as he believes it should have happened. Remember those wonderful piano fills that Larry Muhoberac uses to dress up In The Ghetto, which we've heard on "Here I Go Again?" Well, you're going to have a difficult time even hearing the keyboard on MOST tracks on disc 1. Absolutely bizzare. Ferrante also eliminated the tympani drum from the mix. The 69 material was professionally recorded on 1 inch 8 track open reel tape, at 15 inches per second. These are good recordings. The potential for a good mix was there. But they blew it. Of course, since the original recording was good, the sound here is crisp and clean. But the vibe is WRONG--no piano--just throbbing bass and rythm guitar. It just sounds sort of lifeless. Crisp and clear, but lifeless. I was really looking forward to hearing this 69 material. RCA has never released a complete, unedited show from the 69 season. And they still haven't, as this show does have it's monologue cut and resequenced. Why would Jorgenson be so worried about people having to listen to a monologue? If he is, then why does each track number begin with talking and babble instead beginning with music? This seems inconsistent, and confirms that Jorgenson is perhaps not the best man to be producing Presley's posthumous legacy. Disc 2. A very good show. Elvis was at a peak in Aug 70. This mix is well done. In fact, all the instruments are so clear now--compared to disc 2 of TTWII Special Edition. To hear how much Ferrante deleted from the mix of last years concert on TTWII, compare "Walk A Mile in My Shoes" with the one on this box. On this box, you can actually hear and follow the piano!! That surpised me. The backup singers are also audible in this box!! In short, the mix on the Vegas box in more honest and "accurate" than the one released last year for TTWII. In other words, Ferrante, "got it right" with his mix for Disc 2. Disc 3. Nothing new. Same crap. The mixes aren't really that great. But not bad. You've heard it before. You've purchased it on "On Stage 99," and "Burning Love 2000." Now you are repurchasing it again. Isn't RCA great! These MIGHT be the same exact mixes Ferrante did in 99. Not sure about that though. The 72 material is better recorded than the Feb 70 date...but we already knew that. Disc 4. Repurchase the 56 Vegas performance shall we? I'm not sure it sounds better than the 50's box version...they sure hyped it like it would be a massive improvement...but it's not. The mid 70's Vegas soundboards are interesting, but perhaps of lesser interest, as the King is not quite in his prime. Still some good performances here. Sound quality is better than expected, considering many of these nonprofessional soundboards were dubbed off a cassette by the house soundman at the Hilton. Packaging is "nice." Includes several apparently rare photos inside, along with some that have been around the block a few times. The notes could have been more "in-depth." They were kind of "fluffy," considering the supposed "historical significance" of the box. Overall, I'd give the box a 6.5 out of a possible 10. Summary: Disc 1. 1969 Mediocre, quasi-uninspired 69 show. Substandard mix. Remember, Elvis was in his prime in 69, so I have very high standards for this performance. This dinner show, doesn't even compare to some of the blistering performances from the Aug 23, which were included on the 1990 release, Collectors Gold. The disc is a let down. 32 years later and they still can't get the 69 material "right." Disc 2. Excellent explosive performance. Excellent mix. Aug 1970--Elvis at his peak. Disc 3. Feb 70 and Feb 72. Very good performances--but you've already bought it anyway. Why no alternates from the Jan 70 shows? Disc 4. OK. More stuff you already have (Vegas 56 from the 50's box set), plus a host of rare performed, yet quasi-mediocre fidelity soundboards of respectable, but not exceptional performances--recorded in the mid 70's. Between song chatter shows Presley's sense of humore is still intact here, but his health and performances are audibly on the decline during this, the final phase of his drug-induced self-destruction supernova.
|