175 used & new from $0.01
See All Buying Options
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
 
Lee Considered: General Robert E. Lee and Civil War History
 
 
See all product images
See 1 customer image
Share your own customer images
Search inside this book
Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle

Don’t have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here.
 
  

Lee Considered: General Robert E. Lee and Civil War History (Hardcover)

~ (Author) "The American Civil War, Walt Whitman's "strange sad war," is the most profoundly tragic experience of American history..." (more)
Key Phrases: selected military service records, official grand strategy, true grand strategy, United States, Army of Northern Virginia, President Davis (more...)
2.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (35 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


26 new from $2.48 145 used from $0.01 4 collectible from $18.85

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
  Hardcover -- $2.48 $0.01
  Paperback $22.50 $5.39 $3.75

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

The Myth of the Lost Cause and Civil War History

The Myth of the Lost Cause and Civil War History

by Gary W. Gallagher
3.1 out of 5 stars (19)  $13.57
The Marble Man: Robert E. Lee and His Image in American Society

The Marble Man: Robert E. Lee and His Image in American Society

by Thomas Lawrence Connelly
3.3 out of 5 stars (10)  $17.95
The Confederate War

The Confederate War

by Gary W. Gallagher
4.1 out of 5 stars (20)  $17.06
For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War

For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War

by James M. McPherson
4.5 out of 5 stars (37)  $12.89
Uncertain Glory: Lee's Generalship Re-Examined

Uncertain Glory: Lee's Generalship Re-Examined

by John D. McKenzie
2.7 out of 5 stars (6) 
› Explore similar items

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Lawyer and historian Nolan considers how the historical Lee differed from the legends about him.

Copyright 1996 Cahners Business Information, Inc.

--This text refers to the Paperback edition.


From Library Journal

Marching in the tracks of such historians as Bruce Catton, Thomas Connelly, and T. Harry Williams, Nolan tries to unhorse the mythic Lee. In pointing out the contradictions between the legend and the man, Nolan shows that Lee the slaveholder was not antislavery, that the reluctant secessionist endorsed Southern independence, that the general lost the war by his repeated offensive thrusts and provincial vision--and more. Lawyer Nolan's brief challenges all the commonplaces by insisting that we look at the record rather than the legend in viewing the man, and through him, the war itself. Nolan's debunking is less original than he claims, and his own reading of Lee is somewhat idiosyncratic. But he makes a forceful case for rethinking Lee and all the myths his memory has draped over the Lost Cause. A provocative book, highly recommended for university and major public libraries.
- Randall Miller, St. Jo seph's Univ., Philadelphia
Copyright 1991 Reed Business Information, Inc.
See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 243 pages
  • Publisher: University of North Carolina Press; 1ST edition (April 1991)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0807819565
  • ISBN-13: 978-0807819562
  • Product Dimensions: 9.6 x 6.5 x 1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 2.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (35 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.com Sales Rank: #1,331,814 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

    Popular in these categories: (What's this?)

    #43 in  Books > History > United States > Civil War > Historiography
    #95 in  Books > Biographies & Memoirs > People, A-Z > ( L ) > Lee, Robert E.

    •  Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?

More About the Author

Alan T. Nolan
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

› Visit Amazon's Alan T. Nolan Page
Front Cover | Front Flap | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Flap | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:
Inside This Book (learn more)
First Sentence:
The American Civil War, Walt Whitman's "strange sad war," is the most profoundly tragic experience of American history. Read the first page
Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
selected military service records, official grand strategy, true grand strategy, defensive grand strategy, wartime papers, offensive thrusts, southern honor
Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
United States, Army of Northern Virginia, President Davis, Jefferson Davis, San Antonio, Lost Cause, Porter Alexander, Fort Sumter, Clifford Dowdey, West Point, Cold Harbor, Confederate Constitution, Douglas Southall Freeman, Fort Stedman, George Washington, North Carolina, Second Bull Run, Army of the Potomac, Confederate Congress, Emancipation Proclamation, Fort Mason, General Fuller, General Scott, Iron Brigade, South Carolina
New!
Books on Related Topics | Concordance | Text Stats
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Front Flap | Table of Contents | First Pages | Index | Back Flap | Back Cover | Surprise Me!
Search Inside This Book:
Citations (learn more)
This book cites 55 books:
See all 55 books this book cites

Books on Related Topics (learn more)
 
 

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

Lee Considered: General Robert E. Lee and Civil War History
89% buy the item featured on this page:
Lee Considered: General Robert E. Lee and Civil War History 2.7 out of 5 stars (35)
The Marble Man: Robert E. Lee and His Image in American Society
7% buy
The Marble Man: Robert E. Lee and His Image in American Society 3.3 out of 5 stars (10)
$17.95
Robert E. Lee: A Biography
4% buy
Robert E. Lee: A Biography 4.0 out of 5 stars (27)
$13.57
Explore similar items

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 
(2)
(1)
(1)

Your tags: Add your first tag
 
See most popular tags

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more
 

Customer Reviews

35 Reviews
5 star:
 (7)
4 star:
 (5)
3 star:
 (6)
2 star:
 (4)
1 star:
 (13)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
2.7 out of 5 stars (35 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
28 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars No facts? This book is chocked full of them..., July 1, 1999
By A Customer
This review is from: Lee Considered: General Robert E. Lee and Civil War History (Paperback)
I found this book very interesting and in the precise tone that a serious historical review should take. Namely, present the facts and draw your conclusions from them, not anything else.

I'm amazed at the comments from other reviewers that Nolan doesn't present facts. This book is FULL of facts, many drawn directly from Lee's own writings or the writings of those who spoke or corresponded directly with him.

The picture of Lee that emerges from this book is that he was fallible...his ideas of honor and his own ego were inseparably intertwined..he was a man of his times and culture in his feelings about race...and that while a brilliant campaign general, his grasp of grand strategy was sorely lacking.

The bottomline, this book humanizes Lee, and in many ways this makes his tactical genius even more impressive...while exploding the fallacy that he was some "uber-noble" tragic hero of mythic proportions, forced to fight when he would rather not. The man was a soldier...it was what he did. And he almost destroyed the United States pursuing that profession. I for one am glad he didn't succeed.

Comment Comment (1) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
17 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars A Very Mixed Bag, August 13, 2004
Alan T. Nolan claims that Robert E. Lee has never been objectively considered as a man and general.  Instead, he says Lee has become an icon, a sacred symbol of the rightness of the Secessionist cause.  There is much truth in this.

Nolan goes on to say he will attempt to examine the Lee myth and compare it with the facts.  It is here that he sometimes falls down.

In some respects, Nolan seems right on the money.  He documents that Lee's opposition to slavery was almost purely verbal -- someday, God in his wisdom would end slavery, but till then, everyone was obliged to allow it to continue unmolested.  Quite a few of Lee's fellow slave holders felt the same way.  The possibility that the Civil War Between the States was God's way of ending the Peculiar Institution never occured.

Nolan also shows that Lee had typical attitudes of a white southerner of his time towards blacks, namely, he didn't like them very much and felt that they were inferior to whites; that Lee frequently referred to the Union forces as 'the enemy;' and that Lee wasn't infallible as a general.  It's long past time such simple points were made.

But other times Nolan is quite bizarre.  Although he doesn't quite say it, he seems to feel that Lee was morally obligated to fight for the Union, because as an officer in the U.S. Army he'd taken a loyalty oath to the govt.  So what?  No one at the time expected that oath to be binding on someone who'd resigned his comission.  Nolan flatly argues that Lee should have surrendered the Army of Northern Virginia to Grant sometime after the fall of Atlanta, and certainly shortly after the re-election of Lincoln.  It doesn't seem to occur to him that he probably couldn't have done this, physically (why would his officers and men obey, when they were in touch with Richmond, where Davis was most certainly not surrendering?), and Nolan doesn't realize that this would have been a betrayal of Lee's oath to support the Constitution of the Confederate States.

And although Lee did more than anyone else North or South to heal the divisions of the War, this isn't enough for Nolan.  He thinks Lee should have made a public repudiation of the Secession.  Why he imagines Lee would think the cause he fought for was wrong and immoral he never says.  Heck, I'm a stone Union man, and I can't see how Lee would have come to that conclusion.

Still, this book is a good begining on the task of finally seeing Robert Edward Lee clearly, as a very great and good man and general, but not the Christ figure some historians have made him out to be.  Despite its flaws, its worth reading and thinking about.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
13 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars A "Prosecution" of Robert E Lee, with mixed results..., August 25, 2001
By A Customer
This review is from: Lee Considered: General Robert E. Lee and Civil War History (Paperback)
As a Southerner whose ancestors fought for both the Confederacy AND the Union in the Civil War, I tend to disagree with both sides in the debate over "Lee Considered". I agree with those who argue that a more balanced and realistic view of Robert E Lee is long overdue, and that Nolan's book does offer some telling blows at the Lee mythology. But, I also don't believe that Nolan has made the "convincing" case against Lee that some of the posters on this board would have you to believe. Nolan, who is a lawyer and not an historian (a fact which should be borne in mind as you read this book), attempts to put the romantic, mythological Lee "on trial" and expose him for the flawed and decidedly unheroic person that Nolan believes him to be. Like a good lawyer, Nolan denies trying to "convict" Lee in the beginning of the book, and even states that he admires him in some ways, but the rest of the book reveals Nolan to be committed to "convicting" his target of several specific charges. Namely: 1)That Lee was privately far more supportive of slavery than the Lee myth would have it; 2)That Lee was far more supportive of secession and "breaking up the Union" than his myth reveals; 3)That Lee made numerous mistakes as a General that helped cause the South's defeat - mistakes such as pursuing an aggressive, "go get'em" strategy that led to the highest casualty rates of any Civil War General and bled his smaller army dry; and 4)That Lee prolonged the Civil War longer than was necessary by continuing to fight after Gettysburg, which Nolan argues "convinced" Lee that the South was doomed to defeat, and therefore he should have urged the Confederacy to surrender, or at least refused to fight or encourage his men to make useless sacrifices for a cause he privately knew was doomed. Nolan presents a good deal of "evidence" (much of it in Lee's own words), but like a good prosecutor he leaves out "evidence" which contradicts his theories, and he completely ignores the fact that Lee was a nineteenth-century man, not a late twentieth-century one. An historian would have put many of Lee's views into further context (without necessarily excusing them). Dr. James McPherson, the famed Civil War historian and author of "Battle Cry of Freedom", can hardly be called a "neo-Confederate" historian (if anything he's pro-Union), but even he has some problems with Nolan's book. A few years ago he wrote a criticism of "Lee Considered" in which he "judged" Nolan's "trial" of Lee, and while he found Lee to be "guilty" of being more pro-slavery than the Lee myth allows, he also found Lee to be "innocent" of prolonging the War (McPherson points out that the South still had a good chance of winning the war right up to Lincoln's reelection in November 1864), and that Nolan failed to "prove" many of his other charges, although McPherson argues that Nolan does raise some worthwhile questions about the accuracy of the traditional Lee myth. I fully agree with McPherson's views - this book is worth reading because it does offer a view of Lee that is in some ways more "realistic" than the Lee myth. However, Nolan fails to destroy Lee's reputation as a great general and one of the true "legends" of American military history. Overall, this book is quite a mixed bag, but it's still a thought-provoking, intellectually stimulating piece of work, even if Nolan is sometimes off-target.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

1.0 out of 5 stars The National Inquirer has more substance and truth contained in it
If a book has substantial references and documentation to specifically document controversial opinions and positions of the author, then it may make a worthwhile read. Read more
Published 16 months ago by Grady L. Peeler

5.0 out of 5 stars very interesting and factual
this book shows the flaws of robert E lee. the author disproves many of the myth surrounding Lee about not supporting slavery and being a flawless general -eventhough he was a... Read more
Published 16 months ago by Olahakeem Muhammad

1.0 out of 5 stars He knows not of which he writes
Save your money, Charter assignation is the lawyers trade mark and from Alan Nolan you see his distain for the south and all southern writers; objectivity is not in his vocabulary... Read more
Published 16 months ago by Clyde Henry

1.0 out of 5 stars Trees had to die for this?
Yep, it is, in my opinion, very bad (I can hardly use the word in connection with it) "history." Knowing that I love to read Civil War history, a relative gave me this book for... Read more
Published 22 months ago by Rick Hensley

1.0 out of 5 stars very disappointing book
If you like politically correct revisionism, then this is for you. I don't mind at all reading well reasoned essays, but when the author concludes that nothing about the historic... Read more
Published 24 months ago by J. Allen

3.0 out of 5 stars Provocative, but not wholly satisfactory
In American popular historiography, Robert E. Lee is perhaps the most god-like figure there is next to George Washington. Read more
Published 24 months ago by R. M. Peterson

1.0 out of 5 stars Revisionist Dribble
Alan T. Nolan, an Indiana lawyer, would do better to continue his writing on subjects he is familar...such as the Iron Brigade.
Published on January 22, 2007 by Dan McCown

4.0 out of 5 stars Lee Considered
Nolan analyzes the difference between Robert E. Lee as a historical person and as a semi-mythical icon. Read more
Published on April 29, 2005 by K. Freeman

2.0 out of 5 stars Lee on the stand
I am not a huge fan of Lee and i do not defend him or his actions. with that being said, i feel that Mr. Read more
Published on October 29, 2004 by M. D. Smiley

5.0 out of 5 stars A Hard Reflective Look at Lee, Challenging the Lost Cause
This is a tough book to take if you are a southerner and particularly if you have great respect for the Generalship of Robert E. Lee. Read more
Published on February 28, 2004 by Daniel Hurley

Only search this product's reviews


Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   

Product Information from the Amapedia Community

Beta (What's this?)

Look for Similar Items by Category

Look for Similar Items by Subject

Search Books by subject:



























i.e., each book must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...
 

Feedback

If you need help or have a question for Customer Service, contact us.
 Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
Is there any other feedback you would like to provide?

Your comments can help make our site better for everyone.



Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.