Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
35 of 46 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Liberal Theology at Its Best, April 1, 2004
John Shelby Spong pursues the mystery of the death and resurrection of Jesus, the Christ. For the layperson who can overcome traditional viewpoints, he sets out to propose solutions which are not grounded in a literal understanding of the Bible; nor are they based in a quest for the historical Jesus. He attempts to get to the true meaning beneath the legends and myths that encase the resurrection story. As most Christians would do well to realize, he asserts that even though Jesus was of history, we will never know all that Jesus was or meant. Most especially, we will never know exactly what happened on that moment he suffered and died. He asserts that the first Christians became convinced that Jesus did not die and, to express the intensity of their experience, they used the language and style of midrash. This book appealed to me as one who wanted a reasonable, nonliteralist faith grounded in the mystery of reality beyond time and space. I would highly recommend it for one who wants to delve deeper into their faith. As with his other books, this is a daring examination of the very foundations of Christianity.
|
|
|
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
We can't know what happened but I think I do., December 10, 2007
In Resurrection: Myth or Reality, John Shelby Spong argues against the literal bodily resurrection of Jesus. His argument rests on two foundations: the Jewish interpretive method called midrash, and linguistic subjectivism.
.
Rabbi Iscah Waldman, in an article entitled Filling in the Gaps: How Midrash Functions available at MyJewishLearning.com explains, "Midrash is commonly defined as the process of interpretation by which the Rabbis filled in `gaps' in the Torah." Spong argues that this method should be applied to the New Testament as well. But I see nothing in this definition of midrash that requires non-literal interpretation of the words that are in the text. Speaking of the events that produced the Easter tradition, Spong himself agrees that something did happen. "So we look at the writings we have and seek to understand what they point to, what they reveal, what truth they convey. They all point to one consistent conclusion. Something Happened! Whatever that something was, it had power! Incredible power!" But even if a literal interpretation were excluded by midrash, Spong's argument ultimately falls to a fatal logical error.
.
In chapter III, titled The Vehicle of Words, an Unsteady Ship, Spong lays his second foundation. "No word is subjective; hence no word ever passes from the lips of one person into the hearing of another without being changed in meaning." "Identical words, therefore, are never passed on with identical meaning to two different persons, even in the same tribe." "Words are never neutral or objective...words are never THE truth...so it is that no words employed by anyone at any time can be objective, infallible, inerrant, or strictly literal." "Above all, words must be recognized as symbolic pointers to truth not objective containers of truth." Spong repeats this theme throughout the book.
.
Spong's argument falls on its own sword. If we cannot know what words mean, how can Spong be so sure that he knows what the Bible's words about Jesus' resurrection cannot mean? He, too, uses words to argue for his spiritualized view of the resurrection of Jesus. Even his understanding of Midrash must sail on the "unsteady ship" of words. Based on his own view of the subjectivity of words, I do not find Spong's position on the resurrection of Jesus very convincing. Any conclusion he draws ends up in the inescapable quagmire of its own subjectivity.
|
|
|
22 of 29 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
interesting but i'm still seeking, November 7, 2001
By A Customer
this book is quite readable & Spong's reconstruction is plausible.
I also find his portrayal of Jesus dying alone without a proper burial, (no embalming, no angel) & the dark, bleak months between crucification & proclaim of resurrection, immensely more powerful & touching than the glorified version in the cannon Gospels.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|