Automotive Holiday Deals BOTYKT Shop Women's Dresses Learn more nav_sap_SWP_6M_fly_beacon Indie for the Holidays egg_2015 All-New Amazon Fire TV Subscribe & Save Gifts Under $100  Street Art Project Amazon Gift Card Offer aos aos aos  Amazon Echo Starting at $49.99 Kindle Voyage AntMan Outdoor Deals on Amazon.com BGG

Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.

Disciplined Mind: What All Students Should Understand 1st Printing Edition

3.1 out of 5 stars 8 customer reviews
ISBN-13: 978-0684843247
ISBN-10: 0684843242
Why is ISBN important?
ISBN
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Buy used
$4.00
Condition: Used - Good
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: The item shows wear from consistent use, but it remains in good condition and works perfectly. All pages and cover are intact (including the dust cover, if applicable). Spine may show signs of wear. Pages may include limited notes and highlighting. May include "From the library of" labels.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
62 Used from $0.01
More Buying Choices
10 New from $5.50 62 Used from $0.01 6 Collectible from $5.00
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


Get Up to 80% Back Rent Textbooks

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Hero Quick Promo
Up to 85% Off Over 1,000 Kindle Books
Visit our Holiday Deals store and save up to 85% on more than 1,000 Kindle books. These deals are valid until December 31, 2015. Learn more

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 288 pages
  • Publisher: Simon & Schuster; 1st Printing edition (May 5, 1999)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0684843242
  • ISBN-13: 978-0684843247
  • Product Dimensions: 1.2 x 6.5 x 9.8 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 11.2 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 3.1 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (8 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #613,351 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

21 of 22 people found the following review helpful By Lhunn3@worldnet.att.net on May 26, 1999
Format: Hardcover
Since H. Gardner in his introduction describes this book as "a sustained dialectic -- read disagreement -- with E. D. Hirsch," thus co-starring an old adversary, it seems both fair and essential to read Hirsch as well. What you will find are samples of Gardner's old habit of grossly misrepresenting Hirsch's program in order to attack him, but, more interesting, many examples of the degree to which Gardner has come to agree with Hirsch. For instance, he agrees that background knowledge in the traditional disciplines is necessary to an effective education; that lack of a specific, structured curriculum too often results in incoherence, repetition, omission of content and tedium; that progressivism often produces students who "see themselves as creative" but "lack the skills to do a competent job." And sharply deviating from progrssive orthodoxy, he says that to learn to read, children must be taught "interactive processing involving graphic and verbal representations," i.e. phonics. Further he repeats his admission in previous books that progressive education is not for disadvantaged children "who do not acquire literacy in the dominant culture at home," declaring that a core curriculum, even "one by E. D. Hirsch,"helps to provide a level playing field and to ensure ... a common knowledge base." His encouraging conclusion is that the public school system should provide a number of alternative "pathways," including both Gardner-type schools and Hirsch-type schools. Amazon.com's feature telling us what other related books customers order shows how all too often we read only what we expect to agree with. This is one instance which cries out for going further than this.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
23 of 28 people found the following review helpful By C.A. Ostaff on January 11, 2001
Format: Hardcover
While I whole-heartedly subscribe to the notion of multiple intelligences, I do so more with the factually accurate books of Stephen J. Gould than I do with Howard Gardener's work. This book is written for the American public, not for academia, and it shows. There is no citation, no supporting evidence, and no statistical analysis - merely Gardener holding forth his opinions about depth of knowledge being more valuable than breadth of knowledge. This would have been a much better essay than book. His choice of three examples of depth of knowledge is disappointingly eurocentric in an increasingly African-American, Hispanic and Asian American culture. I can quickly think of three other examples - 1) a study of jazz in 1920s Harlem, 2) the 16th century decimation of South America by diseases brought by Cortez's crew, and 3) a study of classical tonal Asian music - that would be equally as valid to study in depth and would help our students to understand both our culture and the rich diversity of other cultures. Why does Gardener see fit to publish this work? Perhaps he is blind to his own eurocentric ivory tower. He gives tidbits of other educational systems as being superior to ours, but then tells us "the Italian school simply cannot be transferred." So then why bother to use it as an example? To frustrate inspired teachers? Or to persuade us to send our children to Italy for preschool? Finally, Gardener stated that he would rather send his children to a school taught in Hirsch's curriculum and run by a cohesive staff than a school with his suggested curricula and run by the "average, harried" U.S. teacher. I find this very troubling. If the teacher is so important, than why bother to emphasize the curriculum?Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
10 of 12 people found the following review helpful By E. J. Ludwig on May 10, 2005
Format: Hardcover
Prof. Gardner's book is disappointing. He tries to be all things to all people saying both that he believes in basic competencies but wants to put inquiry first. Also, his language is inflated, and lacking in philosopical specificity. For example, he believes in building up the inner world of "mental representations" [unexplained term] yet insists on "performances of understanding" [another unexplained term].

Also, he has respect for the individual learner and individual differences, yet he is concerned about the "position" or "situation" or social class dynamics in which the learning takes place. Thus, he fails to do justice either to the individual or to class, race, or gender. The role of leadership in learning is wholly ignored; and responsibility is not explored. In short, it is extremely difficult to pin down Prof. Gardner. It would be kind to say he is eclectic. I hope it's just not fuzzy thinking.

However, we can discern that he has a romantic obsession with beauty, truth, and goodness. Imagine -- the Holocaust is reduced to being an illustration of what goodness is or is not! His treatment of these ideas is superficial and banal. I don't like to be so judgmental, but his writing about them does not deserve a detailed analysis.

When attacking E.D. Hirsch whom he calls the main speaker for "cultural literacy," he sets up a straw man. He says that Hirsch's school of thought has an underlying belief in the Lockeian "tabula rasa." Yet, I find nothing in Hirsch's writings to indicate that he believes in a tabula rasa.

Further, is Prof. Gardner really less elitist than Hirsch as some have claimed? I have found that the Harvard elite spend their entire lives trying to achieve and learn everything, and be on top.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse



Want to discover more products? Check out this page to see more: educational technology