Join Amazon Prime and ship Two-Day for free and Overnight for $3.99. Already a member? Sign in.

Quantity:

More Buying Choices

44 used & new from $10.00

Have one to sell? Sell yours here

Tell the Publisher! I�d like to read this book on Kindle Don�t have a Kindle? Get yours here.

The Minimalist Program (Current Studies in Linguistics) (Paperback)

by Noam Chomsky (Author) "The chapters that follow are based in large part on regular lecture-seminars at MIT from 1986 through 1994..." (more)
Key Phrases: Case Filter, Projection Principle, Howard Lasnik (more...)

3.9 out of 5 stars See all reviews (8 customer reviews)

List Price:	$40.00
Price:	$32.58 & this item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. Details
You Save:	$7.42 (19%)

In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.

Want it delivered Wednesday, July 15? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details

19 new from $28.52 25 used from $10.00

Also Available in:	List Price:	Our Price:	Other Offers:
Hardcover			2 used & new from $161.78

Frequently Bought Together

Price For All Three: $82.08

Show availability and shipping details

This item: The Minimalist Program (Current Studies in Linguistics) by Noam Chomsky
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. Details
Aspects of the Theory of Syntax by Noam Chomsky
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
Syntactic Structures (2nd Edition) by Noam Chomsky
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. Details

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Syntactic Structures (2nd Edition)

by Noam Chomsky

4.2 out of 5 stars (4) $25.20

Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures (Studies in Generative Grammar)

by Noam Chomsky

$42.00

Understanding Minimalism (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics)

by Norbert Hornstein

4.0 out of 5 stars (2) $33.70

Language and Mind

by Noam Chomsky

3.5 out of 5 stars (6) $19.12

Barriers (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs)

by Noam Chomsky

5.0 out of 5 stars (1) $14.95

› Explore similar items

Editorial Reviews

Product Description
The Minimalist Program consists of four recent essays that attempt to situate linguistic theory in the broader cognitive sciences. In these essays the minimalist approach to linguistic theory is formulated and progressively developed. Building on the theory of principles and parameters and, in particular, on principles of economy of derivation and representation, the minimalist framework takes Universal Grammar as providing a unique computational system, with derivations driven by morphological properties, to which the syntactic variation of languages is also restricted. Within this theoretical framework, linguistic expressions are generated by optimally efficient derivations that must satisfy the conditions that hold on interface levels, the only levels of linguistic representation. The interface levels provide instructions to two types of performance systems, articulatory-perceptual and conceptual- intentional. All syntactic conditions, then, express properties of these interface levels, reflecting the interpretive requirements of language and keeping to very restricted conceptual resources. The Essays Principles and Parameters Theory. Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation. A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. Categories and Transformations in a Minimalist Framework.

About the Author
Noam Chomsky is Institute Professor and Professor of Linguistics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Product Details

Paperback: 420 pages
Publisher: The MIT Press (September 28, 1995)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0262531283
ISBN-13: 978-0262531283
Product Dimensions: 8.9 x 5.9 x 0.9 inches
Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)

Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars See all reviews (8 customer reviews)

Amazon.com Sales Rank: #611,363 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?

Inside This Book (learn more)

First Sentence:
The chapters that follow are based in large part on regular lecture-seminars at MIT from 1986 through 1994. Read the first page

Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
Case Filter, Projection Principle, Howard Lasnik, Van Riemsdijk, Visibility Condition, Attract Move, Extended Standard Theory, Head Movement Constraint, Neg Agr, Full Interpretation, Minimal Link Condition, New York, Universal Grammar, Exp Agr, Sam Epstein

New!
Books on Related Topics | Concordance | Text Stats

Citations (learn more)

This book cites 23 books:

Semantic Structures (Current Studies in Linguistics) by Ray S. Jackendoff in Front Matter
Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar (Current Studies in Linguistics) by Ray S. Jackendoff in Front Matter
Semantics and Cognition (Current Studies in Linguistics) by Ray S. Jackendoff in Front Matter
Speech Sounds and Features (Current Studies in Linguistics) by Gunnar Fant in Front Matter
Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar (Current Studies in Linguistics) by Robert Freidin in Front Matter

See all 23 books this book cites

100 books cite this book:

Long-Distance Dependencies (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics) by Mihoko Zushi on 19 pages
Chomsky: Language, Mind, and Politics (Key Contemporary Thinkers) by James McGilvray on 15 pages
The Syntax of Time (Current Studies in Linguistics) by Jacqueline Gu�ron on 14 pages
Competition in Syntax (Studies in Generative Grammar, 49) by Gereon Muller on 12 pages
Current Issues in Spanish Syntax and Semantics (Studies in Generative Grammar, 53) by Javier Gutierrez-Rexach on 12 pages

See all 100 books citing this book

Books on Related Topics (learn more)

Long-Distance Dependencies by Mihoko Zushi

Discusses:

Essays in Syntactic Theory by Samuel Epstein

Discusses:

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

	58% buy the item featured on this page: The Minimalist Program (Current Studies in Linguistics) 3.9 out of 5 stars (8) $32.58
	13% buy Aspects of the Theory of Syntax 4.4 out of 5 stars (9) $24.30
	13% buy Syntactic Structures (2nd Edition) 4.2 out of 5 stars (4) $25.20
	9% buy Language and Mind 3.5 out of 5 stars (6) $19.12

Explore similar items

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

(What's this?)

Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.

syntax(4)

linguistics(3)

book(2)

minimalism(2)

noam chomsky(2)

grammar(1)

language(1)

theory(1)

See all 9 tags...

Help others find this product — tag it for Amazon search

No one has tagged this product for Amazon search yet. Why not be the first to suggest a search for which it should appear?

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Reviews

8 Reviews

5 star:		(5)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(2)

Average Customer Review

3.9 out of 5 stars (8 customer reviews)

Share your thoughts with other customers:

Create your own review

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

20 of 23 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Beware of theorists who claim to have all the answers, January 29, 2007

By	Jim W. (New Hampshire) - See all my reviews

Chomsky's theories are complex, but so is the subject matter he deals with. He takes simple sentences of English (and, more importantly, sentences which are NOT part of English) as empirical evidence w.r.t. how the computation of human language works. It is well worth any scholar's (or amateur's) time to criticize his theorizing if he or she thinks a criticism is in order. But there is a right and a wrong way to do this, and unfortunately, people often do it the wrong way. The right way involves dealing with the subject in all of its complexity, and takes far more intellectual energy.

To take an example of the kind of work Chomsky tries to do, consider these sentences (an asterisk indicates a sentence that no native speaker of English would accept as part of his language).

1a) It seems that John is tired.
1b) *It seems John to be tired.
2a) John seems to be tired.
2b) *John seems that is tired.

As speakers of a language, we combine words into sentences in various ways. But there is no a priori reason why (1b) and (2b) shouldn't be acceptable parts of our language. Similar distinctions are pervasive throughout all human languages. The goal of Chomsky's theory is to figure out why the ill-formed sentences are not part of our language. That is, how does our brain combine words to adequately and automatically pair sound to meaning, and why are some ways acceptable and others not?

Keep in mind, any reasonably intelligent person can come up with simple or complex ad hoc rules to account for the distinctions in (1) and (2) above. I could, for example, say something along the lines of:

3) A finite verb needs a subject, and a noun phrase must be the subject of a finite verb.

Ignoring the enormous number of difficulties a statement like (3) would face, there is nothing in (3) which explains why it, and not some other rule (such as its converse) should be the appropriate way to combine words. Actually, Chomsky's earlier works focused on doing just this: figuring out what kinds of rules adequately describe language.

In more recent works, however, such as The Minimalist Program (MP), the goal is far more ambitious: to find the fewest and simplest set of operations which can derive the structures of human language. In MP, roughly, these rules are basically Select (choose some words), Merge (combine them), and Delete (remove anything not needed for understanding the sentence). What is often seen as Chomsky trying to "fix" his theories is really his trying to simplify and simplify the generalizations he (and other researchers) comes up with.

But language is complicated, and that is an empirical fact. It shouldn't be surprising that the computation the brain uses to produce and understand language is a complex bit of machinery. The Minimalist Program is staggeringly complicated, but in it, Chomsky is able to show just how far a few simple combinatory processes can go.

The right way to criticize Chomsky is to come up with viable alternatives to the problems he presents. There are scholars who do this from many fronts, roughly categorizable into two groups: the generativists and the functionalists. The generativists share Chomsky's belief that the brain is equipped with a specific mechanism for producing and and understanding language. The non-Chomsky generativists simply disagree w.r.t. how that mechanism works. Frameworks under this category include Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG), Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG), and Tree-Adjoining Grammar (TAG). There are others. The second group feels that language is part of a more general cognitive mechanism. They have developed frameworks such as Discourse-Functional Grammar, Cognitive Grammar, and Construction Grammar.

While most scholars who have to take a side on the matter feel very strongly that their position is the closest to answering the most important questions, few would claim that there is anything fundamentally wrong with inquiring into any framework. Making various assumptions and testing differing hypotheses is bound to contribute to our knowledge of how language works. More often than not, different theories end up helping each other and/or converging on similar conclusions.

If you care about the matter, though, than it is important to consider what it is that you want a theory of language to do. We understand very little about how the brain works, so, at this point, Chomksyan theory is not the place to turn if you want to find a way to, say, learn a second language more quickly. But no one (except some unfair critics) ever said that Chomsky's theories were supposed to be able to do that. They are theories of the mind and how it works, not pedagogical theories.

One critic below claims that MP only accounts for 63% of English syntax. Ignoring the problem of how he could have possibly come up with such a number, one must be wary of anyone who claims have all the answers: no one does. There have been fantastically thorough descriptions of language, but no serious scholar would claim to have figured out everything or even most things. For those who actually read the Minimalist Program, they will find it abound with Chomsky's caveats: he claims over and over again that he does not have all the answers, that the details of language are not completely-understood, and that there is still a lot of work to be done. That being said, the minimalists do often have less than satisfying solutions to even the simplest constructions. But the careful reader will notice that this is not because they are foolish or ignorant, but because they are giving themselves a lot less machinery to work with. This goes back to my earlier point: anyone can describe a problem or come up with various solutions, but it is a far more difficult thing to come up with a simple architecture which describes the complex details of language in general terms. The complication of the MP is that they start with the bare necessity of conception (we interpret language mentally, we speak language physically, and we combine a finite set of words into an infinite number of sentences), and try to strip away as many ad hoc rule systems as possible.

To address some of the specific criticisms listed below:
1. "Chomsky's theories don't hold up in computers"
To what extant? Chomsky's phrase structure has been mostly successful in computer applications, and many computational linguists have used his ideas to create parsers of all kinds. The fact that they don't hold up in any sort "direct transfer" IS due to the fact that we have yet to program a human brain. We are also unable to make machines that see the way we do or hear the way we do. The critics have to concede this point: we have not been able to simulate or program a human brain. Not the Chomskyans, not the critics. The argument that a theory of the mind must hold in artificial computers crucially assumes that that we understand how to program computers as sophisticated as our brain. But we don't. When we come up with a computer that can learn language by watching and listening to human beings (like a child), a similar argument would hold a lot more weight.

2. "Chomsky's theories have proven useless to computational linguistics and artificial intelligence, and thus have implications for nothing."
Ignoring the validity of the premise, who ever claimed that science's goal was to facilitate immediate technology. In this case, Chomsky has never claimed that all the answers have been found, so how exactly is it supposed to have created "magical machines" by now? The implications are supposed to be for learnability, Plato's problem of acquisition (see e.g. Chomsky's "Language and Problems of Knowledge," which discusses Plato's view that language was too complex for children to learn, so they must be born with linguistic knowledge; Plato concluded something along the lines of reincarnation, but the point is the same), and the biology of human beings that allows us to invariably learn the language of our environment without really trying while no other animal, no matter how hard it tries, can quite break the code (even signing apes are only doing something on par with what we (humans) do with a phrase book in a foreign country). Claiming a theory (ANY theory) to be moot because of its lack of technological implementability is on par with criticizing Newton's theory of gravity because he failed to build a spaceship.

3. "None of Chomsky's theories have a scientifically verifiable basis"
Except that they do. For example, he might claim that if X is true, no human language should permit some construction Y. This is done over and over, for example on page 288 where he claims that expletives failing to force agreement on a finite verb should co-occur with an expletive associate which DOES force agreement. In English, for example, the sentence in (4) below is the evidence:

4a) There seem to be some mice in here.
4b) *There seems to be some mice in here.
4c) There seems to be a mouse in here.

(4a) and (4c) show agreement with the associates some mice, a mouse and not with the expletive there. (4b) is ill-formed because seems is not the third-person plural form of the verb, but the associate is third-person plural. If Chomsky's claim is right, linguists with knowledge of various language would need to check to see how the analogues of the constructions of (4) work in their language. If his prediction turns out to be false (e.g. some language which normally has verbal agreement has expletives and no agreement with the associate), the theory is updated to account for the new data. This is, you'll observe, the scientific method; and no theory is ever proven more than tentatively. That is, science dictates that every theory is subject to revision if new data calls it into question. Critics who make remarks such as these are presumably referring to technological verification, but technology is a concept which should be kept distinct from science. I can create technology (e.g. a bucket of water) without ever doing science, and I can do science (e.g. dropping objects of various weights to see if weight affects the speed the object falls) without ever creating any technology. "Verification" in generative linguistics amounts to seeing how generalizations hold across different languages/dialects/constructions.

4. "His grammars are meaningless to normal people, and thus entirely useless."
This, of course, assumes that the benchmark of an adequate theory is its "meaning" to normal people (whoever those people might be). Pedagogical research is important for its own purposes and perhaps more widely applicable to more concrete problems, but beware of criticisms which amount to: "Einstein's theory of space-time is useless. He has yet to build us a time machine or slow down time or let us travel faster than light or through worm holes. Further, his physics haven't done the least bit of good for athletes or kept us from dying when we fall off buildings. His theory is as abstract as it is useless." Keep science and application distinct.

If you want to criticize Chomsky on his own level, start reading some of the above theories (or one of many others I did not name) or even make one of your own, joining the league of brilliant scholars who do more than name call. If you want to work on improving Chomsky's theories, join the league of brilliant scholars who are employed in this difficult task. If you choose to remain on the sidelines or be an amateur enthusiast, remember to keep science and technology separate, and to evaluate theories with regards to what they are actually supposed to account for. Otherwise, join the group of anti-Newtonists who said that the apple fell to the ground because that was its proper place.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)

42 of 53 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars not for the non-specialist, but very important, July 1, 2000

By A Customer

Like Chomsky's 1981 "Lectures on Government and Binding", this is a book that summarizes and synthesizes an entire research program as much as it breaks new ground. The first chapter, in fact, is itself an excellent textbook on developments in the field of syntax since Chomsky 1981 and before the Minimalist Program developed in this book. But most readers will purchase this book for the last chapter, popularly known in the field simply by the nickname "Chapter 4". This chapter, basically a book in and of itself, sketches an entire architecture for natural-language syntax, and sketches at great length all sorts of connections and consequences in other research domains.

That said, this is not a book for the unprepared. Even those very familiar with the field find Chapter 4 inordinately difficult and, at times, obscure. Fortunately, there are textbooks and papers that can provide the necessary background for this work.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)

24 of 30 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars fascinating...., November 22, 2003

By A Customer

This is a very interesting text. Chomsky, asks the following question in his "Minimalist Program": Suppose that we do have a basic language faculty (inherent in all people and by nature--very creative mental faculty), then what can we say about this system? How well designed is it? Can we ask deeper questions about the mind? What is the fundamental nature of human intellectual capacities? Although these of questions might be a bit premature to even pose, Chomsky gives some fascinating responses to these questions.
This book, not only summarizes some previous work, but it also breaks new ground as well. I would suggest it to anyone who is interested in the philosophical and linguistic questions of the mind and language. The only thing one should remember is that the text will be incomprehensible if he/she doesn't have a very strong background in linguistics (esp Chap 4!). If not, there are prep books that will help you understand the basic underlying concepts in the Minimalist Program. Also, Chomsky gives a lot of interviews where he explains, in lay terms, what his work is dealing with.

Lastly, regarding the other reviews, please stick to criticizing the book, and not the author. If one disagrees with what's being said, then refute the argument in an intelligble manner. Don't resort to childish name-calling, bashing and other foolish activities.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review

› See all 8 customer reviews...

Most Recent Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars Important for generative syntax, perversely difficult to read
If you are looking to learn about the minimalist program, this is not the best place to start. Even if you've had a semester or two of GB, you'll find it much more efficient to... Read more

Published 14 days ago by E. A. Hogue

1.0 out of 5 stars Fiction Can Be Fun
Minimalism, like GB and Perameters, is yet another figment of Chomsky's imagination - much like his idea that McDonald's, Israel, and the American government are out to poison... Read more

Published on October 18, 2003

5.0 out of 5 stars Pish posh
Oh, we're sorry. This book is the absolute last word in linguistics and its relation to the neuro-computational-cognitive sciences. Read more

Published on February 27, 2003 by Don Ersperm

5.0 out of 5 stars What every linguist needs to read....
Though Chomsky's writing style tends to be opaque, and takes work to understand from even the best linguists, this book should be a required text for every theoretical linguist... Read more

Published on December 13, 2002

1.0 out of 5 stars Unreadable
It is well known that the Chomskyans don't listen to criticism, however well taken.

The result is the 1995 Chomsky essays, in which relatively well known and... Read more

Published on May 26, 2001 by Dr. Margret Popp

› See all 8 customer reviews...

.jsOffDisplayBlock { display: block; } .jsOffDisplayInline { display: inline; } .jsOffVisibility { visibility: visible; } .jsOnDisplayBlock { display: none; } .jsOnDisplayNoneBlock { display: block; } .jsOnDisplayNoneInline { display: inline; } .jsOnDisplayInline { display: none; } .jsOnVisibility { visibility: hidden; } .jsOnDisplayBlock { display: none; } .jsOnDisplayInline { display: none; } .jsOnVisibility { visibility: hidden; }

Customer Discussions

Beta (What's this?)

New! See all customer communities, and bookmark your communities to keep track of them.

This product's forum (0 discussions)

	Discussion	Replies	Latest Post
	No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight

Start a new discussion

Topic:

First post:

Receive e-mail when new posts are made

Prompts for sign-in

[Cancel]

Guidelines

Active discussions in related forums

Discussion	Replies	Latest Post
textbook Does anyone use Discovering Geometry: An Investigative Approach?	4	9 hours ago
textbook Textbooks for Kindle DX?	38	11 hours ago
language Psycholinguistics - The Psychology of Language	0	3 days ago
language What is the best language course is best?	23	5 days ago
linguistics How has english changed in your lifetime?	7	5 days ago
language CAC Saint Louis wants to know your prefered language?	0	5 days ago
linguistics Interested in Linguistics	3	19 days ago