or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
 
Express Checkout with PayPhrase
What's this? | Create PayPhrase
Sorry!
X
More Buying Choices
45 used & new from $8.77
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage
 
 
Share your own customer images
Look inside this book
Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle

Don’t have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here.
 
  

Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage (Hardcover)

~ Inc. Merriam-Webster (Author)
3.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (30 customer reviews)
List Price: $27.95
Price: $18.45 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $9.50 (34%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.

Want it delivered Wednesday, November 11? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
22 new from $17.53 23 used from $8.77

Frequently Bought Together

Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage + Index to English + The Chicago Manual of Style
Price For All Three: $81.20

Show availability and shipping details

  • This item: Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage by Inc. Merriam-Webster

    In Stock.
    Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

  • Index to English by Wilma R. Ebbitt

    In Stock.
    Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
    This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. Details

  • The Chicago Manual of Style by University of Chicago Press Staff

    In Stock.
    Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
    This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. Details

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Merriam Webster's Dictionary of Synonyms: A Dictionary of Discriminated Synonyms With Antonyms and Analogous and Contrasted Words

Merriam Webster's Dictionary of Synonyms: A Dictionary of Discriminated Synonyms With Antonyms and Analogous and Contrasted Words

by Merriam-Webster
5.0 out of 5 stars (13)  $15.61
Garner's Modern American Usage

Garner's Modern American Usage

by Bryan A. Garner
5.0 out of 5 stars (32)  $29.70
The Chicago Manual of Style

The Chicago Manual of Style

by University of Chicago Press Staff
4.6 out of 5 stars (117)  $28.24
The Copyeditor's Handbook: A Guide for Book Publishing and Corporate Communications

The Copyeditor's Handbook: A Guide for Book Publishing and Corporate Communications

by Amy Einsohn
4.1 out of 5 stars (25)  $16.47
Editors on Editing: What Writers Need to Know About What Editors Do

Editors on Editing: What Writers Need to Know About What Editors Do

by Gerald C. Gross
4.6 out of 5 stars (9)  $11.53
› Explore similar items

Editorial Reviews

Product Description

Objective and comprehensive, Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage is a readable and entertaining guide to the complext history of some of the thorniest usage issues in the English language. The scholarship and authority of this indispensale work have earned it universal critical acclaim.


About the Author

The Merriam brothers desired a continuity of editorship that would link Noah Webster's efforts with their own editions, so they selected Chauncey A. Goodrich, Webster's son-in-law and literary heir, who had been trained in lexicography by Webster himself, to be their editor in chief. Webster's son William also served as an editor of that first Merriam-Webster dictionary, which was published on September 24, 1847.

Although Webster's work was honored, his big dictionaries had never sold well. The 1828 edition was priced at a whopping $20; in 13 years its 2,500 copies had not sold out. Similarly, the 1841 edition, only slightly more affordable at $15, moved slowly. Assuming that a lower price would increase sales, the Merriams introduced the 1847 edition at $6, and although Webster's heirs initially questioned this move, extraordinary sales that brought them $250,000 in royalties over the ensuing 25 years convinced them that the Merriams' decision had been abundantly sound.

The first Merriam-Webster dictionary was greeted with wide acclaim. President James K. Polk, General Zachary Taylor (hero of the Mexican War and later president himself), 31 U.S. senators, and other prominent people hailed it unreservedly. In 1850 its acceptance as a resource for students began when Massachusetts ordered a copy for every school and New York placed a similar order for 10,000 copies to be used in schools throughout the state. Eventually school use would spread throughout the country. In becoming America's most trusted authority on the English language, Merriam-Webster dictionaries had taken on a role of public responsibility demanded of few other publishing companies. 

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 978 pages
  • Publisher: Merriam-Webster (November 1, 1994)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0877791325
  • ISBN-13: 978-0877791324
  • Product Dimensions: 9.6 x 7 x 1.9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 3.4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (30 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.com Sales Rank: #37,151 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

    Popular in these categories: (What's this?)

    #12 in  Books > Reference > Dictionaries & Thesauruses > Slang & Idioms
    #17 in  Books > Reference > Words & Language > Usage
    #71 in  Books > Reference > Words & Language > Grammar

    •  Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
Look Inside This Book
Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Front Flap | Table of Contents | First Pages | Back Flap | Back Cover
Citations (learn more)
3 books cite this book:

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage
83% buy the item featured on this page:
Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage 3.9 out of 5 stars (30)
$18.45
Merriam-Webster's Concise Dictionary of English Usage
5% buy
Merriam-Webster's Concise Dictionary of English Usage 3.5 out of 5 stars (2)
$11.53
Garner's Modern American Usage
4% buy
Garner's Modern American Usage 5.0 out of 5 stars (32)
$29.70
Merriam Webster's Dictionary of Synonyms: A Dictionary of Discriminated Synonyms With Antonyms and Analogous and Contrasted Words
4% buy
Merriam Webster's Dictionary of Synonyms: A Dictionary of Discriminated Synonyms With Antonyms and Analogous and Contrasted Words 5.0 out of 5 stars (13)
$15.61
Explore similar items

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 
(5)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(3)
(3)
(2)
(1)
(1)
(1)
See all 12 tags...

Your tags: Add your first tag
 
See most popular tags

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more
 

Customer Reviews

30 Reviews
5 star:
 (18)
4 star:
 (4)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:
 (1)
1 star:
 (6)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.9 out of 5 stars (30 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
109 of 114 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Superb research, sound usage information, great value!, September 23, 1999
This is the finest work of scholarship on English grammar and usage I have ever seen, in thirty years of doing research on English grammar. One grouchy reviewer on this page gives it a one-star put-down and grumbles that it is unreliable, advocating a return to Fowler, or Strunk and White. Don't believe it. The stiff and constricting prescriptions of those older works are in fact often unfounded. The third edition of Fowler (prepared by Burchfield) is not an improvement, and actually gets grammatical points wrong (and I means things like giving examples that are not in fact examples of the point at issue). The Merriam-Webster book is on a different level of scholarship. The example collection is magnificent, the analysis is intelligent and accurate, and where it says something is now acceptable literate usage you can trust it. Of course, if you want silly advice, like "never end a sentence with a preposition" or "never split an infinitive", you won't find it: there are irrational prejudices in the English usage field, and this book lends them no support. But this is because it demands EVIDENCE and ARGUMENT concerning the points it treats; it is not content simply to pass on dogmas and myths from past centuries. I was particularly struck by the fantastic value of this book: Amazon brought it to my door for shipping included -- and this is a 990-page large-format hardback! BUY THIS BOOK. You can't afford not to if you have any serious interest in English grammar.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
44 of 46 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Scholarly research, authoritative yet cautious discussion, and vast bredth and depth., July 26, 2003
By Daniel Roth (Santa Cruz, CA United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Peruse the bookstore sections on Grammar and Usage, and you'll see there has never been a lack of experts who want to tell you how to write. But the problem with just about every one of these books is that their explanations of grammatical phenomenona are misleading: they're not researched at all. In fact, they're not so much based on English as real writers actually use it, so much as they're based on how the writer fancies everyone ought to use it.

But "Merriam Webster's Dictionary of English Usage" is the only guide to grammar and usage I've found that's worth a damn. Along with Joseph Williams's "Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace", this is the only book in the genre that I would recommend. Too many books in this genre have little to say that hasn't already been said a thousand times, and they're just too hyper-focused on mistakes, a focus which has a way of inculcating a sort of paranoia amongst writers who follow the one-size-fits-all dictums too rigidly. Imagine the way a runner might tip-toe through a minefield. That's the kind of writing these other books bread.

"English usage today is a discourse", this book begins, and that key observation is central to its approach. This observation might seem obvious to some, but almost every other grammar book (Strunk and White's "The Elements of Style" and Diana Hacker's "Rules for Writers", for instance) is written in a bubble outside of this discourse, and they read like theirs is first, and the definitive treatise on correctitude in English. This is the grammar book tradition, which sadly has changed very little in the past 300 years (See Haussamen's "Revising the Rules" for discussion). "Merriam Webster's" diverges from the grammar book tradition by stepping back and summarizing the history of the discourse in a way that puts modern quibbles in a perspective that's sorely missing. It turns out that most contemporary controversies are nothing new; they date back decades, if not centuries. The authors cite liberally from language commentators and armchair grammarians, often in ways that make the "experts" sound clownish. For instance, the authors note how commentators have been wrongly predicting the deaths of the subjunctive and of "whom" for over a century.

This is not a book for those who want over-simplified pronouncements of what's "right" and what's "wrong". Correctness is not a binary, it's a polarity. But "Merriam Webster's" never falls into the correct/incorrect trap, because the authors are grounded in the systematic study of language. How refreshing! The truth is that the writers of most grammar books are not linguists-they're just writers. And that means that they're out of their ballpark when they try to explain the maddening complexities of the English language.

Whereas other grammar books like to fabricate example sentences to fit their prescriptions, "Merriam Webster's" bases all its claims on real-life usage. 20,000+ illustrative citations show how respected writers actually use English. What's most interesting is that for every tsk-tsk rule of writing that your seventh grade English teacher might have taught you, this book provides ample examples of writers that follow them, and writers that flout them. Thanks to the authors' diligent research, we can see that Shakespeare would have failed a quiz on how we are traditionally taught to use "who" and "whom".

An alphabetical listing of 2,300+ entries covers just about every sticking point in the English language that any language-watcher has ever commented on. I've read dozens of grammar and usage guides (which never agree on what should be listed) and "Merriam Webster's" covers every single controversy I've heard, plus many I never imagined existed. Even seemingly uncontroversial words like "claim" and "gap" have made it into this book. More complicated usages-such as the choice of objective or nominative pronoun-are broken into separate sub-issues. The discussions are scholarly and objective. They steer clear of those imperatives and directives that are part of the grammar book tradition, and instead allow you to draw your own informed conclusions.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
32 of 36 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars A Book for the Curious and not for the Ignorant, February 25, 2000
By Michael J. Connor (Waltham, MA USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
In one of the earlier reviews of this book the entry for "at" was misrepresented. I thought I would take some time to set the record straight. The entry for "at" is on page 141. It notes that usage writers from Vizetelly in 1906 onward have written disapprovingly about the use of the preposition "at" somewhere in the vicinity of and especially after the adverb where. The entry goes on to say that this is evidently chiefly an Americanism (attested by the OED Supplement and entered in the Dictionary of American Regional English), but not entirely unknown in British dialects. Scholarly works such as the Oxford English Dictionary, and the Dictionary of American Regional English are cited as well as citations from the Merriam Webster files. The evidence shows the idiom to be nearly nonexistent in discursive prose, although it occurs in letters and transcriptions of speech and there citations given from and Joel Chandler Harris, Flannery O'Connor. The entry gives an analysis of current usage saying that "at" at the end of pronominal phrase beginning with where serves to provide a word at the end of the sentence that can be given stress. It tends to follow a noun or pronoun to which the verb has been elided, as in this utterance by an editor here at the dictionary factory: "Have any idea where Kathy's at?" Then the entry has some conclusions and recommendation "You will note that at cannot simply be omitted; the 's must be expanded to is to produce an idiomatic sentence if the at is to be avoided." Frankly, there is nothing controversial about this, and information provided is accurate, reliable and verifiable. At the end of article is a note to see the entry labeled "Where ...At" for information about the mid 20th century use idiom. This article is on page 955 follows the pattern of the earlier one. There is the history of the usage issue, followed by a history of the idiom, and examples of actual usage, from Cyra McFadden, Paul Mazursky, quoted in Christian Science Monitor, Charles M. Young, Hunter S. Thompson, Dr. Gordon K. Davies, and Gunther S. Stent. Then come the conclusions and recommendations which are that "where it's at" and like phrases "continue to be used today, although they have some of the passe quality of old slang....Other than in these phrases, "at" almost never occurs after where in writing from standard sources." The Merriam Webster Dictionary of English Usage has more in common with the historical English grammars by Metzner, Sweet, Poutsma, Jespersen, Kruisinga and Curme, and the large standard reference grammars by the team of Quirk, Greenbaum, Leech and Svartvik then the run of the mill usage guide that is hawked to the uninformed. You should not let the casual tone of the writing fool you. The information given is accurate, verifiable and reliable.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars The Best Usage Guide for Editors and Writers
"Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage" (MWDEU) is the most thoroughly researched and witty compendium on usage ever published. Read more
Published 2 months ago by C. J. Singh

5.0 out of 5 stars A little-known gem
I bought this along with the M-W dictionary and thesaurus. I had never heard of it, but it fills a special niche that anyone who enjoys speaking and writing correctly can... Read more
Published 5 months ago by MJB

4.0 out of 5 stars Surprised
I was a little surprised at exactly how damaged it was. I feel like the description toned it down.
Published 9 months ago by Emily McBride

5.0 out of 5 stars Editors, writers, word-smiths, take note!
I'm a professional writer and editor, specializing in work for non-Native English speakers, and I often come across usage that I feel is wrong, but can't quite identify the... Read more
Published 14 months ago by B.G. Beige

5.0 out of 5 stars Simply the Best
I can't in this review hope to match the authority given by the professional grammarian Geoff Pullum in his favorable review of the book. Read more
Published 20 months ago by Hellestal

5.0 out of 5 stars Brilliant Writing Tool
This books is perhaps the most useful writing book to me as a published writer. In dictionary-like form, you can look up usage advice for specific words or broader topics like... Read more
Published on June 13, 2007 by Daniel Miller

5.0 out of 5 stars MW- Dictionary of English Usage
If you already know a lot about English and want to know more about its usage and if you are prepared to encounter some complex and sophisticated sample sentences for the usages... Read more
Published on March 26, 2007 by Ender Ilhan

5.0 out of 5 stars One of the best books on the English language
One thing needs to be clear before you buy this book: it is a dictionary, not a book of grammatical rules. Read more
Published on August 12, 2006 by Jonathon Owen

2.0 out of 5 stars Fascinating but ultimately useless
There's lots of interesting historical information here, much of which is a welcome debunking of grammatical shibboleths -- almost six pages, for example, on "ain't", which was... Read more
Published on July 31, 2006 by SkookumPete

5.0 out of 5 stars The best usage guide for business writers
Usage guides cover the etiquette of language, from when you can split infinitives to whether you can say prioritize. Read more
Published on March 15, 2005 by Dr. Kenneth W. Davis

Only search this product's reviews


Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   

So You'd Like to...


Create a guide

Product Information from the Amapedia Community

Beta (What's this?)

Look for Similar Items by Category

Look for Similar Items by Subject

Search Books by subject:















i.e., each book must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...
 

Feedback

If you need help or have a question for Customer Service, contact us.
 Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
Is there any other feedback you would like to provide?

Your comments can help make our site better for everyone.


Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.