15 used & new from $34.95
See All Buying Options
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
 
Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution
 
See larger image 
Share your own customer images
I own the rights to this title and would like to make it available again through Amazon.
Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle

Don’t have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here.
 
  

Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Hardcover)

~ (Author)
3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


4 new from $54.00 11 used from $34.95

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Storm Over the Constitution

Storm Over the Constitution

by Harry V. Jaffa
5.0 out of 5 stars (1)  $26.95
A New Birth of Freedom: Abraham Lincoln and the Coming of the Civil War

A New Birth of Freedom: Abraham Lincoln and the Coming of the Civil War

by Harry V. Jaffa
3.3 out of 5 stars (21)  $15.21
Crisis of the House Divided: An Interpretation of the Issues in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates, 50th Anniversary Edition

Crisis of the House Divided: An Interpretation of the Issues in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates, 50th Anniversary Edition

by Harry V. Jaffa
5.0 out of 5 stars (1)  $16.32
Soft Despotism, Democracy's Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Tocqueville, and the Modern Prospect

Soft Despotism, Democracy's Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Tocqueville, and the Modern Prospect

by Paul A. Rahe
4.3 out of 5 stars (6)  $27.36
In Defense of Natural Law

In Defense of Natural Law

by Robert P. George
4.0 out of 5 stars (1)  $40.50
› Explore similar items

Editorial Reviews

From Library Journal

The current political and social debate about constitutional jurisprudence is appropriately framed here by Jaffa, professor emeritus of political philosophy at Claremont Graduate Schools. He examines the judicial interpretations by various American political thinkers and jurists of founding Constitutional principles. Jaffa supports a higher law/natural law interpretation of the Constitution. He argues, "Modern liberalism and modern conservatism thus viewed, stand upon common ground." Contributors Bruce Ledewitz, Robert Stone, and George Anastaplo criticize Jaffa's main essay, and he responds. All the articles focus attention on the question, "What were the 'original intentions' of the Framers of the Constitution?" For academic legal collections.
- Steven Puro, St. Louis Univ.
Copyright 1993 Reed Business Information, Inc.


Product Description

A unique contribution to the debate over the original intentions of the Framers of the U.S. Constitutions.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 408 pages
  • Publisher: Regnery Publishing, Inc. (January 20, 1994)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 089526496X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0895264961
  • Product Dimensions: 9.2 x 6.3 x 1.4 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.7 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.com Sales Rank: #1,068,485 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

    •  Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?

More About the Author

Harry V. Jaffa
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

› Visit Amazon's Harry V. Jaffa Page

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 
(1)
See all 2 tags...

Your tags: Add your first tag
 
See most popular tags

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more
 

Customer Reviews

3 Reviews
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.0 out of 5 stars (3 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
17 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars A useful contribution, July 16, 2000
By A Customer
This contribution to the seemingly endless debate over original intent serves a purpose in demonstrating that what often passes as a jurisprudence of original intent is anything but that. Jaffa effectively shows that the denial of natural law by modern jurists, both conservative and liberal (although fellow conservatives are the target of most criticism in this book), cannot be squared with the views of the Founders. Jaffa's further argument, that the Constitution must be interpreted in light of the words of the Declaration of Independence, is less successful. A problem is that the author focuses so much on one case (the Dred Scott decision) to prove his point that it is difficult to see how natural law thinking would be applied to other, less emotionally-charged cases. Apparently, Jaffa wants judges to read Aristotle, Cicero, Locke and the like and decide cases based on the insights gleaned from therein. It should be said, however, that the inclusion of the three critical essays from fellow professors, and Jaffa's reply to all three, does allow for an expansion of the author's thinking beyond what is presented in the main, introductory essay (although it does mean that there is a good deal of repetition througout the book). As a critique of self-proclaimed originalists, this is a useful work, but it has little in the way of constructive proposals.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
12 of 27 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Mansfieldians to Jaffa's Defense, April 25, 2000
By Optimus Prime (Hillsdale, USA) - See all my reviews
Though Dr. Jaffa makes a habit of the poor practice of shooting his friends in the back, at times it is the duty of friends--upon being confronted by an enemy of moronic proportions--to come to one another's assistance in light of such great an injustice. The reviewer, or rather backroom scribbler, who had the audacity to rate Dr. Jaffa's book as worthy of only one star, must be a woman or else a madman, for only one of those two would be capable of such an unjustified criticism supported by such weak polemics. Though Dr. Jaffa's book does not take full account of the extent to which Lincoln--and the founders--understood the inherent dangers of equality (as they were seen in practice and elucidated by Tocqueville) it is nonetheless a master stroke of penmanship, philosophy, and history that sheds light on the possibility for practical, yet noble, government that is afforded us under the framework of the constitution. Dr. Jaffa's detractor deserves the penalty afforded by Jefferson to Sodomites--although in this case we'd be cutting off the upper-most organ as well as the lower, thus putting the guillotine to a dual use.
Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
11 of 44 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Poor, very poor., August 2, 1999
By A Customer
This book takes up where its author's personal quest, detailedin its pages, left off. As the author tells it, he made a point offollowing former Attorney General Edwin Meese III around the country to hector him on his understanding of the meaning of the United States Constitution. Whenever Meese simply ignored him, Jaffa says (though not in those words), it was a great rhetorical victory for Jaffa!

One might read Jaffa's account and conclude that Meese was simply responding to Jaffa's behavior the way a polite man would. Jaffa's rhetoric in this book also strikes the reader as being aimed below the belt.

Following on a private letter that James Madison wrote to Thomas Jefferson well after both of them had retired from public life, Jaffa insists that all of the constitution must be read in the refracted light of the Declaration of Independence. This is a common reading of the Old Left, one that Abraham Lincoln and Mario Cuomo share.

Of course, it has no relationship to reality. Neither in the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 nor in the ratifying conventions did people make a point of holding the constitution to the Declaration's standard; indeed, given that the Declaration includes sections upbraiding King George III for trying to provoke slave rebellions in Virginia, one wonders exactly how "Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity" have come to seem to Jaffa, _et al._ to be the Declaration's message.

Avoid this book, then, unless you desire to see an exotic brand of "conservatism" in its most virulent strain. Other than that, it's both unreliable and unreadable.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews


Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   

So You'd Like to...

Create a guide

Product Information from the Amapedia Community

Beta (What's this?)

Look for Similar Items by Category

Look for Similar Items by Subject

Search Books by subject:











i.e., each book must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...
 

Feedback

If you need help or have a question for Customer Service, contact us.
 Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
Is there any other feedback you would like to provide?

Your comments can help make our site better for everyone.



Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.