Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
16 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent, but inaccurate about 2004, September 10, 2005
Because elections are the foundation of any functioning democracy, Andrew Gumbel's illuminating book serves as a sort-of alternate history of American "democracy." His historical research sheds some light on the long-held American tradition of dirty elections, and his report on electronic voting machines should be mandatory reading for anybody who considers themselves a true patriot.
His chapter on the 2004 election, however, is riddled with inaccuracies and oversights. Gumbel obviously did not read "What Went Wrong in Ohio," a.k.a. the Conyers report (available on Amazon). If he had, he would have known that the recount in Ohio was rigged by partisan technicians, and therefore, not a true confirmation of Bush's "victory." Team Bush stole the 2004 election, in ways far more subversive than 2000, thus averting 36 days of legal deliberations and partisan spin. All the evidence is hidden in plain sight, lucidly compiled in "Fooled Again" by Mark Crispin Miller (for the sake of full disclosure, I worked on Miller's book, but will not recieve a penny from its sales. My intention is to encourage people to read as much as possible about the current state of our electoral system).
Read Gumbel's book. Then supplement it with Miller's and the Conyers report. Decide for yourself: was the 2004 election stolen?
|
|
|
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A fascinating historical survey, December 29, 2005
Gumbel has run over the history of American electoral fraud, starting as early as 1788 and running through extensive discussions of the 2000 and 2004 elections.
On the way we learn about a number of fascinating scandals of the past, now largely forgotten, along with some that haven't been, such as the famous Tammany Hall gang that dominated New York City for a decade. Gumbel shows that, while big-city corruption got the publicity, elections in many rural areas were equally dirty. He also show how periodic concerns over ballot box stuffing have resulted in a numbr of reforms that, by making voting harder, have effectively lowered participation, which was once at around 80% of eligible voters, and now is sometimes below 50%. For instance, the secret ballot, by replacing earlier party-distributed ballots that had shown, by color and logos, which party they represented, had the quite intentional effect of disenfranchising many illiterate immigrants and former slaves. The practice of denying the vote to convicted felons even after completion of their sentence was invented entirely to prevent former slaves from voting, and is used to disenfranchise blacks to this day, as notably happened in Florida 2000.
Gumbel's discussion of the Florida crisis is useful, although I thought a little too hard on Gore. His discussion of Ohio 2004, which he feels was clearly a legitimate victory, although he does show the strong evidence of illegitimate means used to suppress the Kerry vote, is obviously unconvincing for many of his readers here. (It's interesting to note that, although the book really works not to be a partisan tract, the reviewers on Amazon seem to be overwhelmingly Democrats.)
The extensive discussion in this book of touch screen voting shows clearly how flawed the technology is in current form. He also adds a fascinating historical perspective by showing how past changes, earlier voting machines and punch card ballots, were promoted in their time as technological wonders which would eliminate corruption and make voting easier.
One thing that is very convincing indeed in this section is the discussion of how professional election administrators have repeatedly ignored, downplayed, or just flat lied about the flaws in technology they have committed taxpayer money to, both with e-voting and with previous technologies. I used to think that the professionals who explained how my fears of touch screen voting were groundless probably knew what they were talking about, since they worked with the systems so closely. I won't ever trust those quotes again after reading this book.
Gumbel's discussion of touch screen voting in other countries is also interesting, both for how he shows that such advanced nations as Venezuela do far better than the US at holding clean and reliable elections, as well as some anecdotes showing that American voting equipment companies have just as doubtful a record overseas as they do at home. This section will give you the mild relief of knowing that the way they're screwing up our elections is (probably) more a matter of corporate greed and incompetence than a deep conspiracy to install permanent right-wing government by fixing elections.
|
|
|
41 of 50 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Finally and Yikes!, August 9, 2005
Wow! After 2000 and 2004 I really did feel like the crisis of electoral politics in the US was systemic but not until Gumbel's book did I realize that the history is all there, well there in HIS book, not in my high school or college history books. Thank heaven he ends with tangible suggestions for solutions and ways to return us to a true democracy. Now the job is to organize to make those suggestions into reality.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|