Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
71 of 74 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The end of the American dream?, September 21, 2002
America's Founding Fathers and early Presidents warned that the success of the new republic depended on keeping corporations in check (p. 5). In fact, Thomas Jefferson believed that big government, organized religion, and commercial monopolies (the "pseudo aristoi") posed the biggest threats to human rights (pp. 69-70). In this sobering history of corporate America, Thom Hartmann demonstrates rather convincingly that inequalities of corporate regulation, taxes, responsibility for crime, privacy, wealth, trade, influence and access to natural resources are depriving us of "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness," the very rights that constitute the heart and soul of the American dream.Hartmann draws parallels between the Boston Tea Party in 1773 and the more recent WTO protests. While most of us were taught that the colonists were upset about "taxation without representation," Hartmann asserts that the colonists were, in fact, protesting "government sponsorship of one corporation over all competitors, plain and simple" (p. 60). He also examines how corporations have used the Fourteenth Amendment--originally enacted to grant rights to freed slaves--to further their own economic interests to the detriment of our individual interests guaranteed under the Bill of Rights. Because of the notion that corporations have the same rights as persons, Hartmann asserts, the world is becoming more unequal everyday (p. 154). Painting a devastating picture of the state of our union, for the most part, Hartmann succeeds in ending his book with a rallying call for "we, the people," to reclaim our lives from corporate America, and to begin living the American dream once again, rather than the corporate dream that has been imposed upon us. Critical and well-researched, this is a book that will no doubt be labeled as "radical" by corporate America, and like David Korten's WHEN CORPORATIONS RULE THE WORLD (1995) and the more recent CASE AGAINST THE GLOBAL ECONOMY (1997), Thom Hartmann's UNEQUAL PROTECTION is a book corporate America is hoping you won't read. G. Merritt
|
|
|
96 of 103 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Assault on the commons, February 22, 2003
Hartmann's analysis of the roots of corporate power is essential reading. He undermines the policies that have protected corporations for over a century. Legally protected today, corporations were long subject to general suspicion. Government charters to operate a business contained many constraining clauses that are now missing. How and why did this change come about? Should government constraints be restored, and if so, how would be brought about? Hartmann presents the history, issues and solutions to the growing corporate takeover of the global commons.He opens by reminding us that the "commons" once represented a village pasture, shared by all. In modern times he argues the same concept embraces the entire planet. The sharing implies common sense be applied to its use. We are beginning to understand our planet is "the commons" for all humanity. Every human has some rights to that commons, but shares a responsibility for its well being. That set of rights and responsibilities is set by the community as a whole, not by any one individual. The community concept, however, is based on the idea that its members are essentially equal. The corporation, due to its amorphous structure and unique powers has gone beyond community ideals. The history of corporate power rests on continued attempts to upgrade an "artificial" entity to a "natural" one. Hartmann traces the erosion of that ideal through this book. An early chip was taken when Queen Elizabeth I granted Francis Drake "freedom from liabilitie" to go pirating. It was an omen for the future. Although the Framers of the Constitution of the United States were vociferous in their resistance to corporations, events pushed their ideals aside. In a rapidly developing economy and to confront European competion, corporations arose and grew. As they grew, they sought not only protection from State taxation, they sought to further their ends by political action, something nearly all governments restrained. After many tries, they seemed to have accomplished it in 1889 during a court case over the collection of property taxes. Hartmann details the events surrounding the case, pointing out that the corporate "victory" of achieving "personhood" is spurious. It was not part of the decision and added as a post judgement note. He suggests that railway lawyer Stephen J. Field likely influenced the writing of the notes by court reporter John C.B. Davis. The victory for business interests virtually turned the 14th Amendment to the Constitution on its head. Business now had the same "rights" as any naturally born human - privacy, investment, political activity and right to trial. Where a state issuing a corporate charter previously had the right to withdraw it for improper activity, a corporate existence was now sacrosanct. Given the vague nature of the corporation, "improper behaviour" could punish individuals, but not the corporation's existence. Hartmann explains how this condition has led corporations to invade the global "commons" with impunity, ravaging nature to acquire resources and markets. People often ask "if corporate dominance is so bad, what will you replace it with?" Hartmann states "the suggestion i'm putting forth in this book is to try democracy." The solution is simple enough - a return to Jeffersonian principles. That doesn't mean a regression to an agrarian society. It means, instead, a restoration of democratic practices - the raising of humans to their natural place of dominance over artificial entities. He encourages local communities to begin redefining their laws to reflect the concept that corporate organizations are not people. Once that precedent is established, the democratic ideal can be restored by revising laws and constitutions up through the political hierarchy. From communities through the states to the national government. He stresses that while there will certainly be resistance and scare tactics, enough popular pressure can restore those lost ideals.
|
|
|
40 of 42 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Have We Come Full Circle?, November 16, 2002
To say the bookshelves are flooded with political fodder these days is an understatement. Some blame the state of the nation on "Stupid White Men", others talk about "Winning the War of Liberty over Liberalism". No matter where you look or what you read, the mudslinging is intense. At times, these authors make EMINEM's rap "battles" with gangsters in the movie "8 Mile" look like an episode of the Mickey Mouse Club.Unequal Protection, however, is not one of these books. It is an historical documentary of sorts that traces the history of the corporation and its role in society from the East India Company, through the FORTUNE 500 of today. It examines the people, actions, beliefs, and mistakes that have led to the extreme concentration of power and wealth among a select few global corporations. While laying the foundation for the future of the United States, keeping power in the hands of the people and preventing institutions similar to the East India Company from gaining unlimited economic and political power was one of the key drivers. For many years corporations were kept relatively well in check and responsible to the people and governments that granted them the right to exist. The passage of the 14th amendment, intended to give all persons (not corporations) equal rights, combined with a ruling in single court case that has been mistakenly interpreted to define corporations as "persons" like you and me opened the door to all kinds of crazy claims by corporations. Subsequent claims and court rulings have directly and indirectly granted corporations virtually unbridled power through creative legislation and enabled some to operate with no consequences whatsoever for damaging and deadly actions. "Unequal Protection" also discusses of NAFTA, which appears to have granted corporations the authority to override what people and sovereign nations have determined to be in their own best interest. This may include protecting local jobs and economies, banning Frankenfoods with the potential to disrupt and/or destroy the food supply and outlawing toxic additives or chemicals known to have adverse effects on public health and the environment. The pursuit of profit is a necessary and healthy part of a democracy and free market economy. However, when it is the exclusive focus, to the detriment of the environment, the commons, and the health and well being of the people that make up societies and corporations, its time to take back the reigns. When corporations factor in the human and environmental costs associated with doing business and can be held accountable for their actions will real change begin. Through the acceptance of corporations as persons in the legal sense, we've come full circle to facilitate and reward the types of actions and behaviors of the East India Company that this country originally fought so hard to get away from. Unequal Protection is an outstanding work. It's history with a perspective, but does not in any way sink to the political mudslinging ways of other books that may be classified in a similar category.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|