|
|
134 of 149 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Not Perfect, But Still Indispensable, May 9, 2002
This film (in two parts) succeeds masterfully as both education on the art of violin and entertainment. As a violinist, myself, not only did I gain invaluable insight into the artistic contributions and musical approaches of the great violinists of the last century, I found myself watching the films, or portions of it, repeatedly, all the while mesmerized by such sights as Heifetz's electrifying renditions of Paganini, Wieniawski, and Tchaikovsky or Oistrakh's intense solo cadenza in the Shostakovich concerto. Viewing this documentary is an ennobling experience. The film, however, is less successful as history in that one does not get a real sense of how violin playing changed since the time of Vivaldi. Apart from a superficial mention of Paganini's revolutionary transformation of the violin's instrumental (i.e. technical) capabilities, little appreciation is paid to how dramatic Paganini's contribution to violin virtuosity actually was. Nor does the film really acknowledge the second revolution ushered in by Heifetz who single-handedly set the yet-unsurpassed standard for complete instrumental mastery against which all violinists are judged to this day and who introduced the modern school of violin playing which prizes complete technical command, cleanness of execution, and fidelity to the score. Heifetz and Kreisler represented antipodal destinies for the art of violin, and while there is great nostalgia and respect for the sweetly personalized approach of Kreisler, it is clear that Heifetz's legacy is the one which has carried forward into the 21st century. Nary a mention is made of this historic fact. In short, the film lacks a contextual backbone from which to assess each violinist and his or her contribution to the development of the art. That said, the film is a treasure trove of archival footage which shows each of these great violin personalities at their best. Worthy of special mention is the Mendelsohnn montage at the beginning of the film wherein the entire first movement is heard through interspliced rare film footage and audio of Oistrakh, Stern, Milstein, Menuhin, Grumiaux, and Elman with each actually performing portions of the movement in a sort of tag-team fashion. Heifetz is also included in the montage, but since there is no film footage of him performing the Mendelsohnn, the director has ingeniously superimposed rare unrelated footage of the maestro in his studio and, in an astonishing sequence, in rehearsal at what appears to be the Hollywood Bowl during the 1930s over his famous 1959 commercial recording of the Mendelsohnn with Munch and the Boston Symphony Orchestra. The entire montage is a masterstroke of concept and editing that was simply stunning to watch. As for the commentary, particularly helpful is Perlman's contributions in that he explains just how daunting the mechanics of violin-playing can be and why it is rightly deemed to be the most difficult instrument to master. His impressions of several of the profiled fiddlers is quite colorful and illuminating, as well. While some may consider it distasteful, watching a film like this begs the question of who was or is the best of them all. The director Bruno Monsaingeon's seemingly egalitarian sensibilities prevents him from either positing this question outright or directly answering it. It is quite clear, however, who his favorite violinist is: Menuhin. He is treated lovingly and with special respect throughout the film. Indeed, Menuhin bookends the documentary. So this is very much a personal film for Monsaingeon. But all violin partisans have to acknowledge the singular figure of Heifetz who perfected every apsect of violin craft and infused his playing with a rugged and disciplined musicianship and sophisticated artistry. No other field of music has been so decisively dominated by one musician. No other performer has mastered his or her instrument so completely. No other artist has sustained his or her performance standards and musical integrity over so long a period of time and over so vast a repertoire. His unprecedented virtuosity only scratches at his importance to violin art - indeed, to all instrumental art. Yet, in the film, the Heifetz phenomenon is barely alluded to. To suggest that Heifetz is merely one of many noted violinists is akin to saying that Michael Jordan is just another basketball player or that Einstein is merely a great physicist. This may be the film's most glaring omission.
|