Amazon.com:
It's a fact--there's no interview question worse than
"Where do you get your ideas?" But Ilium
and
Olympos
encompass such a grand, twisted plotline that the
question begs to be asked. Did this plot come fully formed? Or was it worked
out over the course of your writing?
Dan Simmons:
"Twisted plotline?" Please, sir. I prefer to think of it as a
complicated spiral helix of a plotline. As in "DNA helix."
And to answer your question ... no. No plot or novel of mine has
ever come fully formed. My "careful outlines" usually start out as hasty
scribbles and devolve into doodles. But with every novel of mine, the thing
either comes alive in 100 pages or so or else it gets scrapped. I think of this
as the quickening--the word used in the midwifery sense--and once the tale
finds this life of its own, it's more a matter of hanging on than of
shaping.
"It’s not an exaggeration to say that I chose
to write the huge SF diptych of Ilium
and
Olympos
--dealing in part as they do with the Trojan
War--primarily for my own pleasure of spending up to four years reengaged with
the Iliad
..." -- Dan Simmons
Amazon.com:
Do you have previous experience in Greek classics?
Shakespeare?
Simmons:
I was lucky to have blundered into an astonishingly wonderful
undergraduate liberal-arts education at Wabash College in Indiana. It
introduced me--with some serious expectations of paying attention--to Homer,
the Greek classics, Shakespeare, Chaucer, Browning, and a bunch of the rest of
those DWMs [Dead White Males], and then it gave me the hunger to keep grazing in those
particular fields during the decades since.
It’s not an exaggeration to say that I chose to write the
huge SF diptych of Ilium
and Olympos
--dealing in
part as they do with the Trojan War--primarily for my own pleasure of spending
up to four years reengaged with the Iliad
through many of its
translations and critical studies. The original power and alienness of the
thing are almost beyond description.
Amazon.com:
You've been honored for work in many different
genres--horror, science fiction, mystery--do you start a new story
thinking, "Now it's time to write some hard-boiled crime fiction?"
Simmons:
Nope. Not now. Not never.
But there is the fact that most of the novels I've
published have been presold on a wing and an idea, and partially paid for in
advance, so the publisher (and their lawyers) might be surprised if I delivered
a tale of suburban adultery when an epic SF-novel had been contracted.
As to why I write across multiple genres, I was quoted once as
saying that it was due to my early childhood in the Midwest. Anyone born there
knows that the crops have to be rotated--never the same corn or beans or wheat
planted for too many years in a row--or else the soil becomes fallow.
But never trust an author who quotes himself.
"Ideas are paramount in SF, but never--one prays--at
the expense of the characters, the prose, or the fact that describing the human
heart in conflict with itself is still the only reason for the tale to be
told." -- Dan Simmons
Amazon.com:
Do you find certain genres more difficult to write than others? Is
there any genre you haven't tackled yet that you'd really like to try?
Simmons:
In one way or the other, every
genre is more difficult to
write than the others. (And that's really not the paradox that it
sounds.)
Mainstream fiction--and I’ve written my share of
it--requires of the author, to misquote Kurt Vonnegut, one of those miner's
canary's hypersensitivity to noxious gases. When the little yellow bird (read
novelist) goes feet- and belly-up in his little cage out at the end of that
long pole, there's something poisonous in the air of our culture.
Speculative fiction demands that plus the ability to fill a big
honking canvas with not only bright but believable colors. Even the language of
SF presents a unique series of demands. (With many words to be coined that
should be different, evolved, evocative, convincing, colloquial, but never
silly.) Ideas are paramount in SF, but never--one prays--at the expense of the
characters, the prose, or the fact that describing the human heart in conflict
with itself is still the only reason for the tale to be told. (Even when the
human heart in question might not be human--see my Ilium
and
Olympos
moravecs Mahnmut and Orphu of Io for explication on this
point.)
Horror fiction--if it works--demands that the author light the
lantern the rest of us sensibly leave on the wall and descend beneath the
basement of human anxieties, down through the deep-fear dungeons to a deeper,
darker labyrinth where most sane folks choose not to go.
Mystery fiction--or at least the kind of "Richard
Stark" tough-guy, modern-noir, hard-boiled-to-the-extreme tales I chose
to do in my three-book Joe Kurtz series--demands an eye for verisimilitudinous
detail, a mind for plot, and a stomach for violence that few other forms of
writing even consider.
(Is "verisimilitudinous" a word?)
Historical and suspense fiction, such as my
The Crook
Factory based on Ernest Hemingway's year of playing spy
in Cuba in 1942-'43, or, say, the incredible absurdities of accident
reconstruction and insurance fraud investigation in my
Darwin’s
Blade, require research up the proverbial wazoo. (There are
people out there who really know
this stuff.)
And yes, of course, there are genres I haven't tackled yet
and hope to write within before I deliquesce. (Writers never retire, you
know--we simply go face-down into the keyboard someday and fully expect our
agent to sell that page.)
I have a Western in mind that I’ve been toying with for
years ...
Amazon.com:
What is your next project? Do you have a working title for it yet?
When can we expect it?
Simmons:
I’m 300 pages into a novel called The
Terror
that I’m very excited about. All writers say they are
very excited about their next book, even if that book is only a gleam in the
eye, but I'm half done with this novel and ... I ... am ... very ...
excited ... about ... it.
It's not horror, per se. (It's much more frightening than any
horror I've written to date.) It's based on one of the greatest unsolved
historical mysteries of the past 160 years.
This is the first novel that I’ve written "on spec"--i.e.,
no publisher waiting for it--since 1989 and if I screw it up, it's my own damn
fault. The fascination of the story behind The Terror
, in and of
itself even before the fictional telling, is profound. I get the urge to skip
the writing and just go door to door to tell people the historical facts about
this horrific human mystery.
But I stifle that urge.
Amazon.com:
Finally, are there any authors or books that you particularly
enjoy but feel haven't been discovered by the public yet?
Simmons:
Sure. There are gifted young writers out there of whom I know, all
just trembling on the cusp of wider publication, fame, and Western Canon-hood,
but the young buggers are also lined up to take my job, so why should I toot
their horns for them?
Seriously, there are too many to list here, but this what we
readers do with and for each other, isn't it? Books are the last thing sold
primarily through word-of-mouth from trusted friends and other readers, not via
commercials or print ads.
I was just back for a reunion at my aforementioned Wabash College
and a dean there recommended a novel set in Indiana about modern farming (??)
called
South of the Big
Four by Don Kurtz, which I read during and after my long drive
back to Colorado. I can't get the story, place, or characters out of my head.
And I'll never drive through the Midwest again and look at the fields,
farmhouses, or people there quite the same.
That's what reading's all about, isn't it?
Finally, the former teacher in me hopes that just as some people
say they rediscovered (or first discovered) the poetry of
John Keats
through my
four
Hyperion
novels, that Ilium
and
Olympos
may lead some readers back to such writers as
Homer,
Browning,
Tennyson, and
even a certain
Mr. Will
S.