Customer Discussions > Christianity forum

Marriage is a human institution, it is not the sole purview of your own religion.


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 176-200 of 600 posts in this discussion
In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:12:26 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 18, 2012 10:17:20 PM PDT
Bubba says:
Your link:
www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/may/predators.../predators_051711 does not work:

"Please double check the web address or use the search function on this page to find what you are looking for."
----------------------------------------------------
The www.traditioninaction.org site does not provide sources or documentation for its "statistics". It is also admittedly biased:

"Tradition In Action is committed to defend the perennial Magisterium of Holy Mother Church and Catholic traditions. TIA also works for a restoration of Christian civilization, adapted to contemporary historical circumstances. "

Dr. Frank Joseph also operates a pro-life website called: Abortion Truths. From what he posts on traditioninaction.org, I can only imagine what sort of "Truths" he offers on that site.

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:14:03 PM PDT
Bubba says:
Rachel Verdon says: "you know my questions and answers are honest and genuine"

From what I have seen, your questions and answers are all "Lying For Jesus".

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:16:05 PM PDT
Kessler,
You ask: "Where do you get this information that men, women and children are losing testosterone?

Oh, here. pull up this great article by Dr. Madeleine Castellanos: "Reconsidering Birth Control Pills"
Reclaim Your Sexuality | Tag Archive | birth control
... Dr. C About Dr. Castellanos Speaking/Lectures/Media ContactRecommended
... Tag Archive | "birth control" Reconsidering Birth Control Pills Wednesday, ...
l-ink.us/show/http-wwwreclaimyoursexualitycom-tag-birth-control62346

Some of these pills distort hormone production, including that of testosterone in women and the fetus, for months and many years beyond after quiting them. The lack of natural hormone production creates many health hazards. Look up that new hormone replacement drug Amberen for all the health benefits it advocates.

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:17:03 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:18:42 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:24:41 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:27:48 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:29:26 PM PDT
Kessler,
Please read Dr. Madeleine Castellanos' article on "Reconsidering Birth Control Pills" that I posted for you. It is too extensive to copy and paste on this forum.

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:32:36 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:36:54 PM PDT
Bubba says:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,509733,00.html

[Merriam-Webster,] in 2003 added a secondary meaning for "marriage" as "the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage."

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:38:06 PM PDT
Borich,
There is no such thing as a functional drug addict. We cannot run a democracy on drug addicts, be it a "hidden part of the economy" or be it out in the open - legalized as Ron Paul advocates. If you want to live like that, then it is your prerogative, but hardly a responsible role model for children - hungry children at that.

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:39:39 PM PDT
Bryan Borich says:
>There is no such thing as a functional drug addict.

Not entirely correct.

>We cannot run a democracy on drug addicts,

But we do.

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:50:45 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:52:27 PM PDT
S. Kessler says:
Do you mean estrogen, Rachel? As opposed to testosterone? And how are these hormones getting "eaten""

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:53:03 PM PDT
S. Kessler says:
I actually spend most of my time in the real world. You should try it some time.

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:54:24 PM PDT
S. Kessler says:
No, Rachel, I'm reporting on the act that all the research to date has concluded that gay couples do as fine a job, if not better, at raising their children, whether straight or gay.

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:55:30 PM PDT
S. Kessler says:
So the concept of marriage only belongs to the English-speaking? Fascinating.

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:56:04 PM PDT
S. Kessler says:
Bwahahahahahahaha! Pot calling kettle and all that.

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:56:44 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:56:54 PM PDT
S. Kessler says:
They are not "trillions" of dollars in debt. The social security fund is quite solvent at this time.

Posted on May 18, 2012 10:57:33 PM PDT
soda can says:
"Marriage is a human institution." Not. Partnering is such a successful survival and prosperity strategy, numerous non-human species practice it. They even have their own ceremonies. If there's any who'll say theirs is not marriage, I say: if it looks like a duck...

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:58:45 PM PDT
Is there some legitimate reason to oppose legal same-sex marriage? I'm not aware of any such reasons.

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 10:59:01 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 11:01:54 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012 11:05:45 PM PDT
Borich,
You write in response to my statement that we cannot run a democracy on drug addicts: "but we do."

No. We do not. We do not have a democracy when a nanny state takes over individual sovereignty.
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


 

This discussion

Discussion in:  Christianity forum
Participants:  44
Total posts:  600
Initial post:  May 11, 2012
Latest post:  May 31, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 2 customers

Search Customer Discussions