Customer Discussions > Christianity forum

It is proven: Jesus was married


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-25 of 52 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Sep 22, 2012 3:09:59 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Sep 22, 2012 3:11:31 AM PDT
Truthseeker says:
Yes, a recently discovered papyrus in the M-E confirms that Jesus was married - he wrote it himself.

So there goes another garbage myth of Christianity out the window.

Will the Catholic Church now allow priests to become normal and have sex (not with children as they are doing but with adults as normal people), get married?

What a disgrace that the discredited monothiestic religions are still present in the modern world and still duping billions of people.

Posted on Sep 22, 2012 5:57:11 AM PDT
Truthseeker says:
BUMP! The Jesus of Christian Myth is a FAKE!!!!

Posted on Sep 22, 2012 6:01:29 AM PDT
I'm not convinced that Jesus banging Mary reduces the Christian faith. There is nothing in the Jewish or Christian doctines that denied sex to its Rabbis. Haven't you read the Song Of Solomon? No red-blooded male can read that tome without getting a raging hard-on.

Puritans and Catholics are against free sex but there aren't any other viable sects of Christianity that are against it.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 6:19:31 AM PDT
Jay Runner says:
"Yes, a recently discovered papyrus in the M-E confirms that Jesus was married - he wrote it himself."

Jesus wrote for the public only once -- in the sand, and what he wrote is unknown.

Like Buddha he left the writing to be done by others.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 6:48:13 AM PDT
Mr.Gatz says:
LOL it is dated 300 years after Christ, He didnt write it...try to do more research please

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 7:13:12 AM PDT
Truthseeker says:
"I'm not convinced that Jesus banging Mary reduces the Christian faith."

Actually that would make him an MF, so would significantly reduce the Christian faith.
The suspicion is that Jesus's wife was Mary Magdalene - the same woman who the Catholic Church later portrayed as a prostitute for obvious reasons.

"There is nothing in the Jewish or Christian doctines that denied sex to its Rabbis."

Really? So why does the Catholic Church expect its priests to be virgins, the result of which is that their human urges cause them to systematically abuse children? The Catholic Church is the original Christianity which lasted 1500 years until Protestant movements, and remains the largest part of Christianity today - so hardly some obscure sect.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 7:14:09 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Sep 22, 2012 7:14:35 AM PDT
Truthseeker says:
OK. I stand corrected.
What I meant to say is that he SAID it himself, so it is written and he is directly quoted.

Posted on Sep 22, 2012 8:16:32 AM PDT
Pathfinder says:
It was supposedly tradition for the family of the groom to provide the wine. The wedding feast was provided by the family of the bride. Mary supplied the wine at a wedding. It was also tradition for the eldest to get married first. If Mary was providing the wine then this must have been her son getting married.

When you study the scriptures, the most important message you receive concerns the family and the children. The love that the husband has for his wife, and the love that the wife has for her husband, and the love that the parents have for their children.

The people who interfere with this bond is often condemned. The adulterers, the fornicators, etc.

There was also a commandment was also given for a Bishop to be married: 1 Timothy 3:2

Personally, I believe that Jesus was married, and the bible does not offer any proof to the contrary. On the other hand, a lot of religious theologians do not like to admit that he was. What would be wrong if Jesus got married when he was in his early 20's. Would this have been a sin? Families are forever, and death does not break these bonds.

Personally, I believe that if Jesus was married, and the ministers taught this concept, modern-day Christianity would be taught in a different light. This would bring families to understand that the family was the greatest gift God gave to mankind. The love that exists within the family union continues even after death.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 8:34:39 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Sep 22, 2012 8:35:21 AM PDT
Truthseeker says:
"Personally, I believe that if Jesus was married, and the ministers taught this concept, modern-day Christianity would be taught in a different light. This would bring families to understand that the family was the greatest gift God gave to mankind. The love that exists within the family union continues even after death."

But they did not for 2,000+ years. That means that Christianity is fraud and, worse, encourages sexual abuse of children.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 8:34:55 AM PDT
M. Russell says:
That is a phony. The reason Why? Not one time did the Bible ever mention a woman being his disciple or even being considered it and neither was Jesus married before his death at all. No mourning by his wife. It is amazing how much can be pulled from that small amount of writing and prove it was false. I do agree that it is not normal for priest to be celibate. The celibacy of the priesthood was decreed by Pope Hildebrand, Boniface VII in 1079 AFTER Jesus Death and Jesus imposed no such rule, nor did any of the apostles. On the contrary, St. Peter was a married man, and St. Paul says that bishops were to have wife and children. (Read 1st Timothy 3:2,5, and 12; Matthew 8:14-15).

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 8:36:16 AM PDT
M. Russell says:
Not true. Jesus died and had not wife and there was no woman disciple. I bet the RCC takes charge of it somehow

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 8:36:18 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Sep 22, 2012 8:39:12 AM PDT
Truthseeker says:
Phony? So real-word evidence is phony and the dishonest words in a discredited book are true. Really?
Face it, there is now scientific evidence that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the Bible is a fraud.

Mary Magdalene wasn't a prostitute.
She was the wife of Jesus.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 8:37:35 AM PDT
Pathfinder says:
truthseeker....what verse in the bible says that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute? In Luke 8:2 it says that seven devils were cast out from her.

In John 8:7, A WOMAN was brought to Jesus to be stoned for committing adultery. No where in these scriptures does it say that she was a prostitute.

These are two different women.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 8:37:37 AM PDT
M. Russell says:
EXACTLY! Jesus would have had to get married AFTER he died but then there are those that believe Mary is sitting up in the sky with a big net catching prayers as they fly by. I bet the ones that are not answered are the ones she missed and they are floating around someplace up there.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 8:40:07 AM PDT
M. Russell says:
Not scriptural and once again, if it isn't in the Bible it is not truth and anything out side that is not.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 8:40:36 AM PDT
Pathfinder says:
No where in the bible does it say that Jesus was not married. Christianity is only a fraud to those who do not have a religious foundation to believe in anything.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 8:40:53 AM PDT
Truthseeker says:
"In John 8:7, A WOMAN was brought to Jesus to be stoned for committing adultery. No where in these scriptures does it say that she was a prostitute."

No, but you forget to mention that the Catholic Church has taught this for 2,000 years.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 8:45:04 AM PDT
Truthseeker says:
"No where in the bible does it say that Jesus was not married. Christianity is only a fraud to those who do not have a religious foundation to believe in anything."

Ask the Catholic Church why their priests have to be pseudo virgins, but they are ok to abuse children in their parishes?

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 8:48:24 AM PDT
Pathfinder says:
when you read John 8:31... it does not separate men from women being disciples. Being a disciple of Christ is based upon faith and obedience....and not by gender.....

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 8:52:48 AM PDT
Pathfinder says:
M. Russell.....if it was not in the bible it was done to protect his wife from blasphemy.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 8:53:58 AM PDT
Pathfinder says:
Truthseeker.....they also ignore the law pertaining to the Bishop...he must be married....

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 8:54:06 AM PDT
M. Russell says:
Still no mention of a woman though.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 8:54:34 AM PDT
M. Russell says:
LOL

Posted on Sep 22, 2012 9:52:42 AM PDT
Pathfinder says:
M. Russell......what about the missing books of the Bible?
they consist of at least the following: book of the Wars of the Lord (Num. 21:14); book of Jasher (Josh. 10:13; 2 Sam. 1:18); book of the acts of Solomon (1 Kgs. 11:41); book of Samuel the seer (1 Chr. 29:29); book of Gad the seer (1 Chr. 29:29); book of Nathan the prophet (1 Chr. 29:29; 2 Chr. 9:29); prophecy of Ahijah (2 Chr. 9:29); visions of Iddo the seer (2 Chr. 9:29; 12:15; 13:22); book of Shemaiah (2 Chr. 12:15); book of Jehu (2 Chr. 20:34); sayings of the seers (2 Chr. 33:19); an epistle of Paul to the Corinthians, earlier than our present 1 Corinthians (1 Cor. 5:9); possibly an earlier epistle to the Ephesians (Eph. 3:3); an epistle to the Church at Laodicea (Col. 4:16); and some prophecies of Enoch, known to Jude (Jude 1:14). To these rather clear references to inspired writings other than our current Bible may be added another list that has allusions to writings that may or may not be contained within our present text, but may perhaps be known by a different title; for example, the book of the covenant (Ex. 24:7), which may or may not be included in the current book of Exodus; the manner of the kingdom, written by Samuel (1 Sam. 10:25); the rest of the acts of Uzziah written by Isaiah (2 Chr. 26:22).

Tell me......why are these books not in the bible? They clearly are mentioned.... So according to this.....maybe there are things that do not exist in the bible because some group of people decided to take them out.....

LOL

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 22, 2012 10:41:46 AM PDT
glenn says:
Pathfinder,
Why do you assume that any written work referenced in the Bible should also be in the Bible?
I see no reason to make this assumption.
‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


Recent discussions in the Christianity forum

Discussion Replies Latest Post
Announcement
Amazon Discussions Feedback Forum
457 3 days ago
Mary was Sinless -- Part XXIII 5773 1 second ago
Is saying "Oh My God" using God's name in vain? 33 45 seconds ago
We are living in the Last Days - A Biblical Prophecy Discussion - Part Seven 3688 5 minutes ago
Pre-Tribulation Rapture is a FALSE DOCTRINE 41 5 minutes ago
Is Good Behavior Needed for Heaven? (Part 2) 879 5 minutes ago
Why are Jesus's miracles so unimpressive? 398 7 minutes ago
Beginnings 70 11 minutes ago
You foolish scum! Israel is killing people again and you dont do anything!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!... 128 13 minutes ago
Will God Resurrect People for the Purpose of Punishing them? 136 16 minutes ago
Part 6 - the new thread 1756 25 minutes ago
Jehovah's Witness's 5143 40 minutes ago

Active discussions in related forums  
   
 

This discussion

Discussion in:  Christianity forum
Participants:  16
Total posts:  52
Initial post:  Sep 22, 2012
Latest post:  Sep 23, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.

Search Customer Discussions