Customer Discussions > Evolution forum

Kidneys - obvious examples of intelligent design.

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 76-80 of 80 posts in this discussion
In reply to an earlier post on Jun 3, 2012 4:12:24 PM PDT
Mystére says:
BlockHead says, "Evolutionists actually deny the fact that kidneys are intelligently designed."

Fact? I didn't see a fact that the kidneys are intelligently designed. You did a good job copying and pasting someone's intelligent description of a functioning kidney, but that was the extent of intelligent action in that post. The fact is that the kidney is a very delicate organ. Its structure is maintained by hydrostatic pressure from the normotensive state. Any hypotensive state happens through hypovolemia, for instance, and the kidney is the first major organ to shut down. You'd think that any intelligent designer worth his weight in spam would know this and make the kidney a bit more robust. But noooo....

BlockHead proclaims, "They agree, however, that a pencil is intelligently designed. "

That's right.. Being human, we know what human technology produces. But we can't infer what some unknown supergenius supernatural superintelligent designer's technology would produce. Sorry, but that's just your personal incredulity talking.

Posted on Sep 3, 2012 5:35:17 AM PDT
havm says:
"Darwin's theory is based on assumptions....all things progressively evolved into something else."

That's not the assumption. That's the actual theory.

But todays' Theory of Evolution is not Darwin's anyway.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 3, 2012 9:39:54 AM PDT
A. Caplan says:
Christine M. Janis says: that's why Piltdown Man is proof that there is no evidence for human evolution, right?
>In reference to Piltdown Man there is a question that IDers and creationists seem to avoid: How many IDers and/or creationists did it take to prove that Piltdown Man was a fake? Answer: none. It was falsified by scientists.

Posted on Sep 3, 2012 2:16:13 PM PDT
Brian Curtis says:
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. To creationists, the solution is obvious: no knowledge whatsoever!

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 20, 2012 5:37:32 PM PDT
Doctor says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]
‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in

Recent discussions in the Evolution forum (596 discussions)

Discussion Replies Latest Post
Intelligent Design isn't Science 1117 17 minutes ago
An honest PhD genesists, Dr Sanford, discusses genetic... 136 26 minutes ago
The Things That Nutty Evolution Deniers Say! 4841 3 hours ago
Evolution Info 596 4 hours ago
The "evidence" does not support MA whale evolution theory 905 16 hours ago
In Evolution Theory, Where is the Information Stored that Determines the Appearance of the Animal? 95 16 hours ago
Paleontology! 6 1 day ago
it's been said before....please provide evidence for"intelligent" design..... 2418 4 days ago
"Believing What You Know Ain't So" (AronRa on the creationist mindset) 2 4 days ago
Hitler.....creationist 4 5 days ago
Dinosaurs the founadtion of myths? 12 10 days ago
Another creationist chestnut develops rot: preferential chiralty is physics, not god 1644 12 days ago

This discussion

Discussion in:  Evolution forum
Participants:  12
Total posts:  80
Initial post:  May 18, 2012
Latest post:  Sep 20, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 3 customers

Search Customer Discussions