Customer Discussions > History forum

It's time to stop loony conspiracy theories about 9/11.


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-25 of 231 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Oct 22, 2012 5:34:43 AM PDT
anne says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 22, 2012 8:01:33 AM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 22, 2012 9:02:56 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Oct 23, 2012 5:32:23 AM PDT
anne says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 23, 2012 1:06:35 PM PST
Suet says:
I read the article. It's an example of the logical fallacy known as "argument from incredulity". The author professes to find it incredible that a bunch of Arabs could take over some planes; therefore, it couldn't have happened.

Apart from that, every one of his "factual" claims is false.

It doesn't leave much to discuss.

Posted on Nov 23, 2012 3:08:59 PM PST
Aqualung says:
as long as there is an internet, there will be tin foil helmets.

Posted on Nov 23, 2012 3:20:38 PM PST
"Arabs" take over planes?? Haha! You can't even spell!!! it's A-L-I-E-N-S, not A-R-A-B-S!!!

Posted on Nov 26, 2012 10:46:06 AM PST
Debunker says:
Glad to see this thread being treated with the contempt it deserves.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 26, 2012 1:00:48 PM PST
Suet says:
Poor anne!

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 26, 2012 10:02:05 PM PST
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on Nov 27, 2012 9:25:27 AM PST
What people like Anne can't understand is the simple fact that a few people can, sometimes by accident, cause great damage. What happened on 9/11 was the act of a few dedicated terrorists planning to gain publicity by damaging American landmark buildings. They exceeded their fondest hopes with the destruction of the twin towers.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 27, 2012 9:41:46 AM PST
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 27, 2012 9:51:24 AM PST
Debunker says:
"Anne" understands. She just likes stirring the pot for some oddball reason.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 27, 2012 9:52:30 AM PST
Debunker says:
Perfect example of how conspiracy nuts build their feeble cases. The Arabs are "untrained". The guy's in "poor health" in a "cave".

Simpleminded thoughts designed by simpletons for other simpletons.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 27, 2012 10:05:39 AM PST
Last edited by the author on Nov 27, 2012 10:06:10 AM PST
Suet says:
Bin Laden provided the money and recruits, not the planning and operational control - that was KSM.
And prior to 9/11, neither of them lived in a cave.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 27, 2012 10:54:19 AM PST
J. Schwarz says:
They weren't untrained. They took pilot lessons in the US and trained to fly because we never bothered to question who these Arabs were learning to fly big jets. They could have taken any courses to improve themselves but they chose flying lessons so they could kill the infidels. Sick people. The problem is we were too trusting and we allow these Islamic thugs into our country to take classes that train them to kill westerners. Imagine coming here, taking flying lessons, chemical engineering lessons, physics lessons all to learn how to make bombs and kill as many infidels as they can. They should close the door to these people and let them learn in a madrassah instead.

Posted on Nov 27, 2012 10:56:09 AM PST
J. Schwarz says:
Anne is posting from another planet called clueless. Just put her on ignore, she is not worth anyone's time.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 27, 2012 1:12:42 PM PST
Aqualung says:
apparently they didn't live in caves after 911 either.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 27, 2012 1:14:03 PM PST
Aqualung says:
the behavior that should have drawn instant suspicion was that the pilots did not care to learn about take offs & landings, just the flying inbetween.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 27, 2012 1:19:18 PM PST
Domenico says:
'' untrained Arabs accomplished that only with guidance from a cave''

Who said they were 'untrained' ?
Who said they were guided from a cave by OBL?

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 27, 2012 1:20:38 PM PST
Domenico says:
We still allow them.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 27, 2012 1:35:55 PM PST
Debunker says:
Nobody said those things. But the conspiracy kooks need to repeat them in an attempt to justify their idiotic theories.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 27, 2012 1:49:34 PM PST
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 27, 2012 1:50:00 PM PST
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 27, 2012 1:54:51 PM PST
Domenico says:
Bookish said...

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 27, 2012 1:55:52 PM PST
Domenico says:
Yeah, blame the cutters. LOLOL
‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


 

This discussion

Discussion in:  History forum
Participants:  17
Total posts:  231
Initial post:  Oct 22, 2012
Latest post:  Dec 9, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 1 customer

Search Customer Discussions