You ignored the primary point entirely. Here it is again:
Are you saying the left doesn't care about evidence and withholding judgment until the facts are in?
The hearings were open upon request. Only own witness requested that. It was granted. The transcripts of the hearings were published in 1964. I own a set. They are the first 15-16 volumes of the 26 volumes of evidence. Note you are changing the point -- first it was the investigation was top-secret, now it is the hearings. What will you be claiming tomorrow?
The further point is Oswald is an self-admitted Marxist-Leninist (who disavowed being a communist), and the left cannot accept that one of their own killed JFK, so they put the evidence through the wringer attempting to find something to deflect from Oswald killing Kennedy. But there is nothing to deflect from that, because Oswald killed JFK and all the evidence points to it.
Recent discussions in the History forum
AnnouncementAmazon Discussions Feedback Forum
|442||14 days ago|
|History of the Palestinian Nation (Part IV)||8075||16 minutes ago|
|JFK Assassination XXIV||177||38 minutes ago|
|Let's just say if 9/11 was a conspiracy...||1296||1 hour ago|
|A Place For Pro-Israel Posters IV||954||2 hours ago|
|JFK Assassination Part VI||5703||2 hours ago|
|History has been made this evening!||15||5 hours ago|
|Trump assassination I||443||22 hours ago|
|The Georga Guidestones March 22, 1980||20||1 day ago|
|History Being Made Right Now... A Coup is Taking Place in Turkey||57||2 days ago|
|Gorbachev and further thawing of the Cold War and the IRBM Treaty||6||2 days ago|
|How did America ...||108||2 days ago|