We have been so dazzled by mounted knights that we naturally have believed that they were, of course, the undesputed kings of the battle field, but I belive the opposite is true. In the age from 500AD to 1400AD the infantry arm (including archers, crossbowmen, bill men, etc right up to arquebusiers) won battle after battle. Movies like Braveheart tell us the same thing, when the knights show up, you run. "Until you build spears, larger than a man!" "If you build them they will die."
Battles like Agincourt, Crecy, Stirling, kephissos, Courtrai, Dupplin Moor, Bannockburn to name a few. Have historiians and general readers been so decieved by the color and grandier of the chivilous arts?
Recent discussions in the History forum
AnnouncementAmazon Discussions Feedback Forum
|430||Mar 23, 2015|
|Soldiers, Soldiers of the 5th of Line ... do you not Recognize me?||74||35 minutes ago|
|Who killed JFK on November 22nd, 1963? What are some of your answers and beliefs? VOLUME II||2572||52 minutes ago|
|A Place For Pro-Israel Posters III||7089||2 hours ago|
|Putin in the Ukraine, sanctions, more Russian military intrusions, what's next?||765||2 hours ago|
|History of the Palestinian Nation (Part IV)||821||3 hours ago|
|Why the interest in WWII?||360||5 hours ago|
|Draft for President 2016: Robert D. Putnam, For Our Children & Theirs||3||8 hours ago|
|Was Franco the good guy in the Spanish Civil War?||98||8 hours ago|
|It seems to have passed without notice.||44||9 hours ago|
|Red Baron||16||18 hours ago|
|Democrats and Guns -||75||1 day ago|