Customer Discussions > History forum

Is History always Current History? Are there some constants in History - some traditions.

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-8 of 8 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Jan 2, 2013 8:32:42 PM PST
Hoo-Zen!! says:
What gets me is the way the British have swallowed whole and spat out the Empire thing - all inside a century - 50 years at a pinch.

Hobsbaum always impressed and recenty was quoted well. just forget the quote.

What is the UK planning with the land grab in Antarctica?

Posted on Jan 2, 2013 8:40:19 PM PST
John M. Lane says:
Every generation writes its own history. If you look at texts from earlier generations you can see it happening.

Posted on Jan 2, 2013 8:59:58 PM PST
Hoo-Zen!! says:
I guess so. I was impressed with the generalist views that occurred in the 70's 80's and the way this gave way to more specialist histories of the 80's and 90's. Currently "How to go to War" Saul David and "The Story of Science" are specialist themes that do a really fine job of tying things to "Big Picture" views of history generally. "The Crusades" was on SBS (TV Australia) recently and gave a realistic account of the first second and third crusades as parts of a movement that occurred over two centuries. Unfortunately the author concluded some conclusions about its lack of significance in the broad scheme of things that I disagreed with. And even though the fellow had (at the beginning) a spiritual take on the events there was no sense of religion itself as a mover and shaker in History - it was more a case of the curious disposition of medieval christianity and the strategic skills of the leaders on opposing sides that was emphasised.

I am still taken by the idea of looking to the US for accounts of the UK and vice versa. I gave up on the French some time ago but the Germans have some nice work on medieval movements.

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 3, 2013 11:45:48 AM PST
John M. Lane says:
I agree about the Germans. Leopold von Ranke established the discipline of scientific history. Before that, it was the grand narrative which tended to replace science with literary appeal.

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 6, 2013 6:46:00 AM PST
Jeff Marzano says:
Hoo-Zen!! says:

[What is the UK planning with the land grab in Antarctica ?]

The sun never sets on the British Empire.

That was true because England grabbed countries all over the world to exploit them and take all their resources.

Wasn't that really the cause for the World Wars ? Taking from those who were weaker.

Germany. France. England. Japan. The United States. They all do it or at least have done it historically.

That's what the Viet Nam War really was, at least in my opinion. Although that was't so much taking from other countries as creating a war that nobody wanted to export violence and mass murder so Johnson and his cronies in the Military Industrial Complex could line their greedy pockets.

If Jack Ruby hadn't shot Lee Oswald the history of these United States would have turned out very differently assuming the United States still even existed. Oswald didn't last long in police custody.

Posted on Jan 6, 2013 7:00:30 AM PST
Last edited by the author on Jan 6, 2013 7:01:06 AM PST
>>It's a turn-around jump shot
It's everybody jump start
It's every generation throws a hero up the pop charts
Medicine is magical and magical is art
Think of the boy in the bubble
And the baby with the baboon heart

And I believe
These are the days of lasers in the jungle
Lasers in the jungle somewhere
Staccato signals of constant information
A loose affiliation of millionaires
And billionaires and baby
These are the days of miracle and wonder
This is the long distance call
The way the camera follows us in slo-mo
The way we look to us all
The way we look to a distant constellation
That's dying in a corner of the sky
These are the days of miracle and wonder
And don't cry baby, don't cry
Don't cry<<

Boy in the bubble
Paul Simon

Posted on Jan 15, 2013 11:15:12 PM PST
Hoo-Zen!! says:
Paul Simon - what a talent.

In reply to an earlier post on Feb 6, 2013 7:46:26 AM PST

"History repeats itself". This is the main reason that's given for why we study it.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in

Recent discussions in the History forum

Discussion Replies Latest Post
Amazon Discussions Feedback Forum
425 Aug 15, 2014
Who killed JFK on November 22nd, 1963? What are some of your answers and beliefs? 1657 9 minutes ago
Kennedy Assassination II 4916 20 minutes ago
"Majesty, we have lost the war!" 1 35 minutes ago
Jewish Myths and Facts - Questions and Answers About a Living History 8970 37 minutes ago
Dresden 427 3 hours ago
History of the Palestinian Nation (Part III) 4479 4 hours ago
Greatest War Movie Regarding Authenticity As To Its Actual Events.. 152 5 hours ago
What's the best history book you've read recently? 129 7 hours ago
Final Solution 7828 9 hours ago
Ken Burns' Roosevelts (TR, FDR and Eleanor,) is the finest history ever told as TV. 2 11 hours ago
A Place For Pro-Israel Posters III 4727 13 hours ago

This discussion

Discussion in:  History forum
Participants:  5
Total posts:  8
Initial post:  Jan 2, 2013
Latest post:  Feb 6, 2013

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 1 customer

Search Customer Discussions