Doing some research on the history of slavery led me to ponder the following question. I've given the question to my uni students here in Tokyo with assurances that I, for one, certainly do not know the right answer.
Can ending slavery be an after-the-fact justification for war and conquest?
The obvious first example that comes to the mind of most Americans would be the Union's conquest of the Confederacy. If ending slavery can be used to justify the Civil War, can it be used to justify the following invasions?
Japan outlawed slavery in Taiwan, Manchuria, and Korea (where, according to one source, it approached 30% of the population) after its conquest of those countries. After conquering Tibet, China ended slavery there. According to Chinese sources, well over 50% of the country were slaves.
Can the justification be made?
Did, in fact, slavery exist in Taiwan, China, and Tibet before outside invasions?
Any other similar situations come to mind, where a conqueror does "good" things like ending slavery?
Recent discussions in the History forum
AnnouncementAmazon Discussions Feedback Forum
|430||Mar 23, 2015|
|Civil War Question||60||8 minutes ago|
|Kennedy Assassination II||7456||10 minutes ago|
|Who killed JFK on November 22nd, 1963? What are some of your answers and beliefs? VOLUME II||3537||28 minutes ago|
|Can liberal American Jews still support Modern Israel? - the country has changed and is not what you think it is anymore.||939||1 hour ago|
|Fact then and now: if you are a homeowner with a gun you are more likely to get a robber entering your house than he is to get you--READ!!!||100||1 hour ago|
|The Jewish God mandated Holocausts, says the Bible||22||2 hours ago|
|Are the purges history?||40||2 hours ago|
|A Place For Pro-Israel Posters III||7266||2 hours ago|
|What are your favorite assassinations.||55||2 hours ago|
|Thank Bush for all those illegal alien children||3||2 hours ago|
|The Lusitania was so much more important a ship than the Titanic||297||2 hours ago|