Doing some research on the history of slavery led me to ponder the following question. I've given the question to my uni students here in Tokyo with assurances that I, for one, certainly do not know the right answer.
Can ending slavery be an after-the-fact justification for war and conquest?
The obvious first example that comes to the mind of most Americans would be the Union's conquest of the Confederacy. If ending slavery can be used to justify the Civil War, can it be used to justify the following invasions?
Japan outlawed slavery in Taiwan, Manchuria, and Korea (where, according to one source, it approached 30% of the population) after its conquest of those countries. After conquering Tibet, China ended slavery there. According to Chinese sources, well over 50% of the country were slaves.
Can the justification be made?
Did, in fact, slavery exist in Taiwan, China, and Tibet before outside invasions?
Any other similar situations come to mind, where a conqueror does "good" things like ending slavery?
Recent discussions in the History forum
AnnouncementAmazon Discussions Feedback Forum
|430||Mar 23, 2015|
|History of the Palestinian Nation (Part IV)||1193||11 minutes ago|
|Who killed JFK on November 22nd, 1963? What are some of your answers and beliefs? VOLUME II||3273||44 minutes ago|
|Could Germany Won WWII If It Wouldn't Have Had Japan and Italy as "Allies"?||39||47 minutes ago|
|Was Groening guilty?||448||1 hour ago|
|Fact then and now: if you are a homeowner with a gun you are more likely to get a robber entering your house than he is to get you--READ!!!||83||3 hours ago|
|General Douglass MacArthur VS General George S. Patton. ...Battle Of the Super Generals||28||3 hours ago|
|Putin in the Ukraine, sanctions, more Russian military intrusions, what's next?||798||4 hours ago|
|A Place For Pro-Israel Posters III||7220||5 hours ago|
|Worst President in History||2472||6 hours ago|
|The straw that broke the camel's back. The Vietnam War.||619||6 hours ago|
|Fighter aces head to head match up.||67||7 hours ago|