I read Clauswitz for a class then reading after some actual leaderhip experience. The professor who lectured on the book said it was an example of reason and military calulation. No doubt it is a long and complex book. The more I read the book the more I saw it in the Romantic tradtion.
The book starts with the mechinical assumption that those with the greater force should win all things being equal. The focus of the book that I read was in the CnC of the force. That the political leader gives the CinC the mission and they then figure out how to get it done. In the end of every anaylsis depends on the Genius of the commander. That is take in as much data as he can of his forces and what he knows of the enemy and make the right decissions. His model was Napoleon who was able to have a sence of the military and was able to pick leaders not on class but actual ability.
I can relate to the level and burdens of command he advocates where the whole army depends on the decissions of a single leader.
Recent discussions in the History forum
AnnouncementAmazon Discussions Feedback Forum
|430||27 days ago|
|History of the Palestinian Nation (Part IV)||512||40 minutes ago|
|Who killed JFK on November 22nd, 1963? What are some of your answers and beliefs? VOLUME II||1914||41 minutes ago|
|A Place For Pro-Israel Posters III||6931||56 minutes ago|
|Greatness||2||1 hour ago|
|Civil War 150th Anniversary||1450||1 hour ago|
|What is the West?||24||5 hours ago|
|Democrats and Guns -||7||5 hours ago|
|Vietnam Trivia||142||7 hours ago|
|Putin in the Ukraine, sanctions, more Russian military intrusions, what's next?||732||7 hours ago|
|Potsdam station, 26 July 1914||11||23 hours ago|
|How's your Imperial German martial music ?||9||1 day ago|