Automotive Deals Best Books of the Month Amazon Fashion Learn more nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc Pink Floyd Fire TV Stick Happy Belly Coffee Ruby jewelry Amazon Cash Back Offer harmonquest_s1 harmonquest_s1 harmonquest_s1  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Starting at $49.99 All-New Kindle Oasis AutoRip in CDs & Vinyl Segway miniPro
Customer Discussions > History forum

Jews vs. Goyim?

This discussion has reached the maximum length permitted, and cannot accept new replies. Start a new discussion


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 3226-3250 of 1000 posts in this discussion
In reply to an earlier post on May 27, 2012 10:52:40 PM PDT
William B says:

Nick:

RE: "...the most evil and genocidal movement of the 20th century..."

What movement?
________

Heard of a fella called Marx ?

In reply to an earlier post on May 27, 2012 11:02:25 PM PDT
John M. Lane says:
What did you wish to say about Marx, street professor?

Posted on May 27, 2012 11:14:52 PM PDT
William B says:
Your point, then, is that Marxism was "...the most evil and genocidal movement of the 20th century..." And, was Marx a typical Jew?

In reply to an earlier post on May 27, 2012 11:16:22 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 28, 2012 10:12:38 AM PDT
William B says:
I think that Nick would like Karl Marx if he really knew him.

In reply to an earlier post on May 27, 2012 11:17:37 PM PDT
John M. Lane says:
I'm almost afraid to tell him that Karl Marx was a convert to Lutheranism before he became an atheist and a Communist.

In reply to an earlier post on May 28, 2012 8:44:19 AM PDT
Sixties Fan says:
This post has another quote from Churchil about the Jews:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/11706

Op-Ed: The United Kingdom Unites Against...

Published: Monday, May 28, 2012 12:27 AM

The writer wonders what the British expect to gain by boycotting produce from Judea and Samaria - and what the reason for it is.

Tabitha Korol
Ms. Korol, based in Ohio, USA, is the editor of Never Again Is Now, blogs at Victorious America, and Right Truth. She also writes for CAMERA.

Tesco Direct, a United Kingdom supermarket has conformed to labeling produce imported from the West Bank, by Palestinians or "settlers," in accordance with the British government's official, but non-binding, recommendation of 2009.

In keeping with age-old Judeophobia (including 400 years of Jewish banishment during the Middle Ages, and England's blocking entry to Jews returning from the Holocaust), England seems to have joined a financial, existential war against Israel. The sharia-compliant unite in the non-violent boycott urged by a pro-totalitarian entity against a thriving, productive and charitable democracy.

The UK appears to have acquiesced to ignoring the legal boundaries that were established for Israel and uses armistice lines from a war that the Arabs began, but lost. The Green Line, neither an international nor permanent border, is an armistice line, marking positions held by both sides when the final truce was called at the end of the 1948 war, and remained so because Arab leaders refused to negotiate final border lines.

The Oslo Accords called for, among other things, Israelis and Palestinians to negotiate a final border between the State of Israel and a future Palestinian state but, to date, these outstanding issues remain unresolved.

For England or the EU to take it upon themselves to force the Palestinian position on the sovereign State of Israel appears to be an act of aggression. The Jews' right to settle the land is "a legal right assured by treaty and specifically protected by Article 80 of the UN Charter.

· - It was not because Palestinians came from Palestine, because there was no geopolitical entity called Palestine, no Arab nation with historical roots on this soil, and since the first century, Palestine was always associated with the Jews.

· - It was not because Palestinian land was stolen from Palestinians, because they never existed as a people and only took the name (1967) to link themselves to the land so as to establish credibility in conquest. Palestine was always home to Jews, and the Palestinian Brigade that helped England during WW II was entirely Jewish; the Arabs fought on the side of Nazis.

· - It is not because the Palestinians covet statehood and were denied, because they refused to accept the land apportioned them, rather hoping to appropriate Israel's land as well.

· - It is not because they'd lost their land, which was not theirs to begin with, but because they lost the war when five Arab armies attacked the newly established State of Israel - and lost the war they caused in 1967, and no leader came forward to establish peace with Israel.

· - It is not because they are the indigenous people who were exiled, because the Jews are the indigenous people and the Arabs want control over the entire Middle East - and Europe, and England, and America, and Asia, etc.

· - It is not because this one Jewish state, Israel, is land-grabbing, because Israel has seven million people on 8,000 square miles of land compared to 1.5 billion Muslims, a majority in 50 countries on over 5 million square miles of land.

· - It is not because the Arabs of Israel are a persecuted minority, because they are 20% of Israel's citizens and live better in Israel than their counterparts in Arab-ruled countries, where they are persecuted by their own religious doctrines and their leaders. Under Israel's administration of the territories, Arabs' lives improved remendously, from developed infrastructure, to expanded schools and universities, to opening 100+ health clinics, to growing employment, to a soaring life expectancy. The PA took over in 1994 - 18 years ago!

· - It is not because Palestinians would be a democratic state if allowed statehood, because in the entire world, there is not one single democratic Arab state - all are tyrannies in varying degrees.

· - It is not because Israel rules Gaza because Israel does not occupy Gaza, so that now Gazans are free to fire rockets at Israel daily - and the West Bank is controlled by terrorist Hamas.

· - And it has nothing to do with "settlements," as this is housing for Israel's citizens on legally-owned Israeli land, and the Arabs began the war long before Israel was founded and longer before there were "settlements."

I believe England has bowed as low as possible to Islam, from the moment that the Archbishop of Canterbury decreed Sharia law equal to the laws of the land, and brought about the situation where the new immigrants need not respect England's decrees, could qualify for entitlements and support, and would be free to bring violence to the streets.

The latest news: England's Guardian has declared Tel Aviv to be Israel's capital, not Jerusalem!

If the UK allows Islam to best Israel, whether by force or stealth/economics, then the British Isles will also be doomed.

Winston Chuchill wrote (1920), "We owe to the Jews a system of ethics which, even if it were entirely separated from the supernatural, would be incomparably the most precious possession of mankind worth in fact the fruits of all wisdom and learning put together," and he admitted the "disgrace that no senior member of the Royal family has ever undertaken an official visit to Israel although the Queen has made 250 official visits to 129 countries in the region"

England, with the help of the BBC, other liberal media, and the companies that refuse to stand for honor and integrity when confronted with the demands of evil, has joined the Islamic war machine - and is now experiencing financial and moral bankruptcy.

Islamists did not come to the West to escape bondage, but to impose their bondage on the free, by first blinding us with unsubstantiated, unjustified charges designed to demonize Israel, destroy her economy, and undermine freedom.

It may not be long before the country and the song, "There'll always be an England" are relegated to the annals of oblivion.

Posted on May 28, 2012 10:16:19 AM PDT
William B says:
Nick:

Here's some of your friends in action:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f03_1330829653

In reply to an earlier post on May 28, 2012 7:55:01 PM PDT
William, True nutcases>

My my, what are you cracked up to be?

or simply on it?

In reply to an earlier post on May 28, 2012 8:41:41 PM PDT
John M. Lane says:
Ahhh, Yacob Disraeli takes the high road, once again. LOL !!!!!

In reply to an earlier post on May 28, 2012 8:50:00 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 28, 2012 8:51:51 PM PDT
John,you are a disappointment to mankind to disavow historical records of Russian political parties.That Jews were a n important part of communism is an accepted fact.Jews were victims of later communism but nevertheless were involved deeply in the party.

STANISŁAW KRAJEWSKI
Jews, Communism, and the Jewish Communists
Ten Theses
1. Marxism, radical leftist ideologies, and `real socialism' constitute not only a fragment of
world history, and of Polish or Hungarian history, but also a chapter of Jewish history.
2. Anti-Semites have grossly exaggerated the Jewish involvement in communism, distorted
the facts, and interpreted them according to conspiracy theories. Jews were also victims of
communism.
3. Jewish communists rarely cared about Jewish concerns and often virtually stopped being
Jewish.
4. Some of those who had abandoned Jewishness later came back. The number of Jewish
communists, and their role, was so important that other Jews must not ignore it.
5. The deepest problem is posed by the quasi-religious character of the communist
involvement of some Jews.
6. There is no distinctive Jewish radicalism. There is no `Jewish communism'. Jews became
communists because of general mechanisms.
7. It was not Judaism or Jewish traditions but the social situation that led Jews to involvement
in communism.
8. Participation in evil can begin with noble and selfless intentions.
9. Moral responsibility can be indirect. Reemerging Jewish communities in Eastern Europe
should face the legacy of Jewish participation in communism. However, accepting a Jewish
share of moral responsibility does not make non-Jews less responsible.
10. Objective research is needed to clarify the extent and nature of Jewish participation in
communism. The tragic consequences of the anti-Semitic myth of `Jewish communism'
should impose no taboo.
Introductory Remarks
The phrase `Jews and communism' immediately brings to mind two sets of associations.
The first image, common in the West, is that of the persecution of Jews in communist
countries: the destruction of religious traditions; the doctors' plot and, more generally,
Stalin's anti-Semitism, which almost led to the large-scale murder of Jews; the fate of
refusniks and the discrimination against Jews in the Soviet Union; official anti-Semitism in
Poland in 1967-68. The second set of associations, popular in East Central Europe and
beyond, is expressed as the image of `Jewish communism': Jews as the founders of leftist
movements and as communist leaders in the states that were governed by communist parties;

Read the whole issue at:

http://web.ceu.hu/jewishstudies/pdf/01_krajewski.pdf

Posted on May 28, 2012 8:56:48 PM PDT
Patton On Communism
And The Khazar Jews
General Patton's Warning
Edited by Raquel Baranow
2-18-9

Read General Patton's own words of what he experienced with the Jews.It's too vulgar to print on Amazon or Rachel would drift off in a fir of vapors and fits.Nevertheless,it tells a true story of the impressions they left on American sensibilities.

http://www.rense.com/general85/pats.htm

In reply to an earlier post on May 28, 2012 9:01:54 PM PDT
John M. Lane says:
Hello Lawrence A. Dickerson,

You're the one disavowing "historical records of Russian political parties...." The Communist Party was officially atheist according to its founder, Karl Marx. Jews could not join the Communist Party. They had to become atheists to be Communists.

You make the point that Jews were active in political movements during the 19th and 20th centuries and I don't deny that. So were Christians, Muslims, Deists, agnostics and atheists -- among others.
It was Nazi dogma to classify Jews as a "race" and then to equate "the Jewish race" with "the Communist threat."

Judaism, however, is a religion. A Jew could leave Judaism and become a Communist. Some of them did. The Communist Party has always been officially atheistic. You can't be both a Jew and a Communist. Karl Marx said so.

In reply to an earlier post on May 28, 2012 9:24:53 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 28, 2012 9:33:46 PM PDT
Stalin's Jews

We mustn't forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish

Published: 12.21.06, 23:35 / Israel Opinion

Here's a particularly forlorn historical date: Almost 90 years ago, between the 19th and 20th of December 1917, in the midst of the Bolshevik revolution and civil war, Lenin signed a decree calling for the establishment of The All-Russian Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution and Sabotage, also known as Cheka.

Within a short period of time, Cheka became the largest and cruelest state security organization. Its organizational structure was changed every few years, as were its names: From Cheka to GPU, later to NKVD, and later to KGB.

We cannot know with certainty the number of deaths Cheka was responsible for in its various manifestations, but the number is surely at least 20 million, including victims of the forced collectivization, the hunger, large purges, expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass death at Gulags.

Whole population strata were eliminated: Independent farmers, ethnic minorities, members of the bourgeoisie, senior officers, intellectuals, artists, labor movement activists, "opposition members" who were defined completely randomly, and countless members of the Communist party itself.

In his new, highly praised book "The War of the World, "Historian Niall Ferguson writes that no revolution in the history of mankind devoured its children with the same unrestrained appetite as did the Soviet revolution. In his book on the Stalinist purges, Tel Aviv University's Dr. Igal Halfin writes that Stalinist violence was unique in that it was directed internally.

Lenin, Stalin, and their successors could not have carried out their deeds without wide-scale cooperation of disciplined "terror officials," cruel interrogators, snitches, executioners, guards, judges, perverts, and many bleeding hearts who were members of the progressive Western Left and were deceived by the Soviet regime of horror and even provided it with a kosher certificate.

All these things are well-known to some extent or another, even though the former Soviet Union's archives have not yet been fully opened to the public. But who knows about this? Within Russia itself, very few people have been brought to justice for their crimes in the NKVD's and KGB's service. The Russian public discourse today completely ignores the question of "How could it have happened to us?" As opposed to Eastern European nations, the Russians did not settle the score with their Stalinist past.

And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name "Genrikh Yagoda," the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU's deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin's collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system. After Stalin no longer viewed him favorably, Yagoda was demoted and executed, and was replaced as chief hangman in 1936 by Yezhov, the "bloodthirsty dwarf."

Yezhov was not Jewish but was blessed with an active Jewish wife. In his Book "Stalin: Court of the Red Star", Jewish historian Sebag Montefiore writes that during the darkest period of terror, when the Communist killing machine worked in full force, Stalin was surrounded by beautiful, young Jewish women.

Stalin's close associates and loyalists included member of the Central Committee and Politburo Lazar Kaganovich. Montefiore characterizes him as the "first Stalinist" and adds that those starving to death in Ukraine, an unparalleled tragedy in the history of human kind aside from the Nazi horrors and Mao's terror in China, did not move Kaganovich.

Many Jews sold their soul to the devil of the Communist revolution and have blood on their hands for eternity. We'll mention just one more: Leonid Reichman, head of the NKVD's special department and the organization's chief interrogator, who was a particularly cruel sadist.

In 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5 percent of those holding the most senior posts in the Soviet security apparatuses were of Jewish origin. They too, of course, were gradually eliminated in the next purges. In a fascinating lecture at a Tel Aviv University convention this week, Dr. Halfin described the waves of soviet terror as a "carnival of mass murder," "fantasy of purges", and "essianism of evil." Turns out that Jews too, when they become captivated by messianic ideology, can become great murderers, among the greatest known by modern history.

The Jews active in official communist terror apparatuses (In the Soviet Union and abroad) and who at times led them, did not do this, obviously, as Jews, but rather, as Stalinists, communists, and "Soviet people." Therefore, we find it easy to ignore their origin and "play dumb": What do we have to do with them? But let's not forget them. My own view is different. I find it unacceptable that a person will be considered a member of the Jewish people when he does great things, but not considered part of our people when he does amazingly despicable things.

Even if we deny it, we cannot escape the Jewishness of "our hangmen," who served the Red Terror with loyalty and dedication from its establishment. After all, others will always remind us of their origin.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0%2C7340%2CL-3342999%2C00.html

In reply to an earlier post on May 28, 2012 9:29:48 PM PDT
"One of the first symbols of Bolshevism was the swastika, proposed by Jewish officials as the chief element of the arms of state. Among other uses, the reversed swastika appeared on uniform sleeves in the Red Army, and, in 1918, on bank notes in denominations of five and ten thousand rubles."


"The star of David was used on the first Bolshevik documents and Soviet military insignia. It was later superseded by the five-pointed Masonic star."

Oleg Platonov , "The History of the Russian People in the Twentieth Century" (Moscow, 1997, p. 520):

In reply to an earlier post on May 28, 2012 10:20:17 PM PDT
John M. Lane says:
I agree with your posts about the murderous nature of Communism, street professor. "Uncle Joe" Stalin, for example, murdered three million POWs who were forcibly repatriated to the Soviet Union after the Nazi surrender.

I do not, however, blame that evil on "the Jews." I blame it on the Communists.

You should too.

In reply to an earlier post on May 29, 2012 3:06:13 AM PDT
Theo says:
John- there are 3 kinds of Jews: one is a racial Jew; anyone who has the genes of A,I&J. They could be anything from an atheist to a Budhist, etc. etc. Two a religious Jew; one who follows
Judaism. Three a regenerate Jew; one who like Abraham believes in the LORD and is created to him for Righteousness (Gen6:15.)
Today, one who has accepted Jesus Christ as their personal savior.

In reply to an earlier post on May 29, 2012 7:58:43 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 31, 2012 6:08:34 PM PDT
Aluf B. says:
William B:

That Yacob Disraeli= an invented name also talks about Reisterstown road in Baltimore shows me that this is the Omni. Impossible that three different people have the same experience. Hence the nutcases.
Omni I , Omn II, Omni III, am bimbo is Omni IV.

Good to see you here. I hope all is well with you.

In reply to an earlier post on May 29, 2012 8:00:18 AM PDT
Aluf B. says:
No thanks!

Rachel

In reply to an earlier post on May 29, 2012 8:16:36 AM PDT
Sixties Fan says:
It is possible that J is also Omni = Omni V

In reply to an earlier post on May 29, 2012 8:24:05 AM PDT
Sixties Fan says:
There are no racial Jews as Jews are not a race.
Jews are Jews.
Atheists are Atheists.
Budhists are Budhists.
All have the right to follow their GD, or the lack of a GD, whichever way they like.

No Jew accepts Jesus as their personal savior.
There is no such thing in Judaism, and Jesus himself would tell you that, if alive.
He would never have become a Christian. It goes against too many Jewish ideas, laws, etc.
Especially the one where a man is a god come to save humanity.
Or an immaculate birth.
These are all Pagan ideas. They did not exist in Judaism then (during Abraham or Jesus' time), they do not exist in Judaism now.

In reply to an earlier post on May 29, 2012 8:27:56 AM PDT
[Deleted by Amazon on May 29, 2012 9:25:08 AM PDT]

In reply to an earlier post on May 29, 2012 8:52:05 AM PDT
L. King says:
You've reposted this 2006 article at least a half dozen times, Nick. It's written by a journalist, not an historian, and is inaccurate. Though many Jews and non-Jews were initially attracted to the communist party because of the promise of equality and prosperity, it is the latter actions of the party which discredit it, including the widespread and violent purges, in particular of Jews.

For example, the 38.5% "published statistic" is way too high and the author provides no source or justification for it. Undoubtedly its source in Nazi propaganda of the time, which no doubt also is part of your favourite reading as the Nazis also blamed the Jews, like you do, for the start of WW I and II, a charge which is patently biased and untrue.

The author, Sever Plocker has made other mistakes in judgement, which he admits. For example here he has revised his take on Syria:

"I was wrong and I admit it. Three times in the past three years I wrote articles in favor of a peace treaty between Israel and Syria. I wrote, based on numerous conversations with senior security officials, that Israel can achieve peace with Assad's regime in exchange for willingness to withdraw from the Golan Heights, whose security significance has become dubious, if not wholly non-existent.


While making this argument, I did not take into account the Damascus regime's tyrannical character. I fooled myself. Even when Assad won 98% of the vote in the last elections I did not wake up and say: We must not make peace with this man. I believed in peace so much to the point of being blinded to reality.


I should have seen reality. As one who researched and wrote about the fall of tyrannical regimes, I should have realized that Arab affairs experts are wrong, just like Soviet experts were wrong before them."

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4061938,00.html

In spite of your constant whine that people do not think for themselves, it is increasingly obvious that you are the one guilty of non-critical thought. Both articles are labelled "opinion" - and that is what they are, nothing more, and nothing less.

In reply to an earlier post on May 29, 2012 8:59:37 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 29, 2012 11:12:51 AM PDT
L. King says:
You have a tendency to read history backwards. The swastika was not a symbol of evil until it's later association with the Nazis in WW II in the late 1930s and beyond. It's use prior to that point in time is rather innocuous.

I have an inherited collection of poker chips that incorporate a regular (as opposed to an inverted) swastika in a very nicely configured oak box/card case, circa 1910. They are a curiosity, nothing more. As are you.

In reply to an earlier post on May 29, 2012 11:16:56 AM PDT
Bimbo says:
Rachel,

I told you my father (in law) is Yacob, and Omni is my estranged husband.

So what you are saying is like, well, idiotic. Of course they know about Pikesville. Yacob lives in Green Spring Valley, almost in Pikesville. DO you know where Miller's Deli is, or Mount Washington Tavern?

In reply to an earlier post on May 29, 2012 11:23:38 AM PDT
L. King says:
rense.com along with veterinarians today are both intensely antisemitic web sites. George S. Patton was a great general, unfortunately, like you Loser Larry, he was judeophobic, as this article shows. Amazon deleted my previous excerpt - I will post a link and then try and post the excerpt again:

http://voices.yahoo.com/the-dark-side-george-s-patton-666204.html?cat=37

Patton's reaction to Jews, recent survivors of the Holocaust, reflect badly on the man. That you would choose to use this to justify your own prejudices indicates that you've gone seriously wrong as a human being.
Discussion locked

Recent discussions in the History forum

 

This discussion

Discussion in:  History forum
Participants:  90
Total posts:  10000
Initial post:  Mar 31, 2012
Latest post:  Dec 31, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 4 customers

Search Customer Discussions