I've been reading Ebert's movie reviews since the early 80s, buying every one his yearly review compilations. I just visited his website for the first time in a bit and noticed something different about his reviews there. They are shorter than they gave been historically.
I doubt Ebert has less to say about contemporary films than he has those of even the recent past, so I wonder what's going on here? Are the reviews posted on the website edited for length from their original size, which, presumably we will get to read when they are published in next year's compilation?
If, on the other hand, these are the original reviews and Roger has decided to cut his word count, I am a bit disappointed. Moreover, I noticed that I didn't get as much sense from the reviews I read of what
Ebert really thinks about the movies. There were no discussions of directors, or photography, just an idea of what the film was about and some mention of the actors.
Curious. I hope it's not because of health issues. Ebert is a national treasure for film fans and it's way too soon for him to lay down his pen.
Recent discussions in the Movie forum
|Movie Game! Ten Movies Where . . . (March 2015)||8805||9 minutes ago|
|ABC Movie Game||2464||15 minutes ago|
|TV Talk||3961||1 hour ago|
|Alibi Lounge II: Cast Iron||2152||1 hour ago|
|Dazzling Double Features!||188||1 hour ago|
|Movie What Ifs!!||42||2 hours ago|
|Will Ferrell to Play Dementia-Stricken Reagan||16||3 hours ago|
|Sci Fi , Horror & Fantasy The Good The Bad & the Ugly||69||3 hours ago|
|Westerns||315||4 hours ago|
|One Degree of Separation - Season Five||1748||4 hours ago|
|British Detective Series II: International Mystery & Mayhem||300||4 hours ago|
|The movie review thread for people who don't write movie reviews so well||298||4 hours ago|