Automotive Deals HPCC Amazon Fashion Learn more Discover it Periphery Fire TV Stick Health, Household and Grocery Back to School Handmade school supplies Shop-by-Room Amazon Cash Back Offer CafeSociety CafeSociety CafeSociety  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Introducing new colors All-New Kindle Oasis AutoRip in CDs & Vinyl Segway miniPro
Customer Discussions > Mystery forum

"Let the Right One In" novel questions (spoilers galore - warning)


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Aug 9, 2012 7:58:51 AM PDT
S. Waas says:
Read the fine Swedish vampire thriller "Let the Right One In" by Lindqvist (in English translation), enjoyed the US movie version "Let Me In" which is nicely scary and well done too.

Questions about the novel however (spoilers here so don't read further if you don't want spoilers)...

We learn that Eli (the vampire 12-year old) is about 200+ years old. He (or she if you wish) has flashbacks to the era when he was castrated by some decadent nobility. This doesn't make sense. The incident would have occurred at the beginning of the 19th century, when Sweden was in a virtual constitutional democracy (at least not ruled via whim). The culture in the flashback is medieval however. Now if "Eli" were 600 years old, maybe. Was it a simple author's mistake so show Eli so young? His "incident" couldn't have happened because the society described hadn't existed for hundreds of years in 1800.

Second question... Why this gruesome scene at all? It's obvious that the castration doesn't "turn you" because we see Eli later attacking the woman, not killing her, but his bites turn her (typical vampire style).

So I was otherwise entertained by the novel but I thought the author went way overboard describing the eunuch ceremony, since it's not set far enough back in history to be believable, and has no "vampire creation" impact. It seems to be tossed into the story for sensationalism and was unnecessary. I thought it was unsettling pseudo-porn without much purpose otherwise. We never are shown Eli's actual "conversion" to vampire -- castration couldn't do it, right?

I think the films did a lot better, keeping the idea that Eli was actually a pubescent girl frozen in time. The sexual tension of the US movie was well done, I think, without an actual "teen sex" resolution, so we've got a non-sexual union at the end, a very good story line.

Your thoughts? Thanks.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


Recent discussions in the Mystery forum

 

This discussion

Discussion in:  Mystery forum
Participants:  1
Total posts:  1
Initial post:  Aug 9, 2012
Latest post:  Aug 9, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.

Search Customer Discussions