Customer Discussions > Politics forum


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 101-111 of 111 posts in this discussion
In reply to an earlier post on Jun 20, 2012 7:22:52 PM PDT
D. Mertins says:
I just wonder when they'll go bankrupt.

GE didn't sell them because they thought it didn't make good business sense.

Does that mean Lock-up is done to??? Maybe they'll change the call sign to THUG and have 24 hours crime instead of fake "news"

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 20, 2012 7:38:43 PM PDT
Mitt Romney has said a lot of dumb things. This isn't one of them.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 20, 2012 8:02:18 PM PDT
Aardwizz says:
Well, he did refer to it as a "touch-tone" keypad (they don't beep). And the name is "Wawa", not "Wawas", as he kept repeating.

And his "analysis" regarding the innovation of the private sector over the public fails to take into account that Wawa has a financial incentive to enable the customer to continue to browse the store (for chips, a soda, desert, etc.) while captively waiting for their sandwich, while Subway (which offers a similar product, but without the ordering system) does not (which is why Subway has a human take the order). Similarly, the government has a financial incentive NOT to over-apply resources to a problem, which is why lines at the DMV or post office can be long, DEPENDING ON WHEN YOU GO.

But I do agree that this isn't a Romney "gaffe"; he's merely playing to the crowd, repeating the "government is bad" shtick.


In reply to an earlier post on Jun 20, 2012 11:53:28 PM PDT
seajaw says:

Actually, it's sort of like a rainbow. Have you ever tried chasing a rainbow? Just when you think you've almost reached the end (the ceiling), it magically moves farther away. ;)

Posted on Jun 21, 2012 12:02:07 AM PDT
A customer says:
MSNBC will be bankrupt soon.

FOX has 300% more viewers then CNN & MSNBC combined.

Ann Curry was reassigned from Matt Lauer's Liberal Today Show.

They are now #2 behind GMA after many years. The folks just got tired of the liberal lies.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 21, 2012 12:26:31 AM PDT
seajaw says:
Okay. O'Donnell caught Hannity doing it on one item, and John Stewart caught him doing it on something else.

In O'Donnell's case, Hannity made a Rewrite item look like O'Donnell was bashing Ann Romney, over her MS.

Not true, as O'Donnell pointed out, by showing the clip Hannity ran, but running it a few seconds longer.

This allowed the point O'Donnell was making to play out. He wasn't knocking her use of the dressage horse for theraputic means. He was knocking Mitt's declaring the horse as a $77,000 business deduction, rather than as a deduction for health care.

Stewart caught Hannity doing the same thing, with a clip of the president that supposedly showed him saying that the law doesn't allow him to make the changes to the deportation laws he announced the other day.

However, if you show the next few lines of what the president said, you realize he's saying that there are some things he can't do, but others that he can. And the thing he can do is what he just did.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 21, 2012 6:31:40 AM PDT
Ze'ev says:
Well this is a amazing post except it was MSNBC's management that edited and approved the clip so the left wing cranks that watch it's station would gloat.

I guess you've forgotten that Obama has also" intentionally edited a speech"
Two Republican House members say Obama misquoted them

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 21, 2012 6:42:53 AM PDT
Ze'ev says:
I guess you think I'm a FOX fan or I get my news from them.

I hate to burst your bubble but the only time I watch FOX for more then a few seconds is when one of the FOX babes are on.

MSNBC has a propensity of twisting the news and has been caught so many times that most people who are not left wing cranks won't even bother watching the channel--check the viewership on that station and that should be sufficient evidence.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 21, 2012 10:04:40 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Jun 21, 2012 10:05:23 AM PDT
Absolutely nothin', unless they look worse out of the dress than in it.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 21, 2012 10:04:58 AM PDT
Not into porno.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 21, 2012 10:11:01 AM PDT
Ze'ev says:
Me neither I like to look at classy ladies in beautiful outfits.
‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in


This discussion

Discussion in:  Politics forum
Participants:  28
Total posts:  111
Initial post:  Jun 19, 2012
Latest post:  Jun 21, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 1 customer

Search Customer Discussions