Customer Discussions > Politics forum

Willard Romney is a shameless liar


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 26-50 of 92 posts in this discussion
Posted on Jun 9, 2012 1:51:24 PM PDT
Richard, I see all sides very clearly, it is very evident the currant crop of Republicans are out to destroy America and all America has stood for.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 1:55:59 PM PDT
That's not clear at all, Monica.
And the word is "current," unless you're writing about fruitcakes.
....Wait a minute.....

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 1:59:41 PM PDT
It is very clear to intelligent people who refuse to drink the tea party Kool-ade. It is very clear to the intelligent people who refuse to be herded by the sheeple herders.
It is very clear to those of us with the ability to think for our self and have the courage to stand up for America and the Bill of Rights.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 2:06:41 PM PDT
Patricia K. says:
Her most recent post isn't any better.
And, not surprisingly, still not clear.
Do you want to make the corrections, or should I?

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 2:09:31 PM PDT
I stated it is very clear to INTELLIGENT people. Sorry you can not comprehend that but it does explain a lot.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 2:14:42 PM PDT
Monica: "It is very clear...."

Oh for the old days when she used to preface her outrageous but pithy comments with "obviously"....

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 2:15:43 PM PDT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 2:23:08 PM PDT
Patricia K. says:
Did you read/edit this before you posted it?
"It is very clear to intelligent people who refuse to drink the tea party Kool-ade. It is very clear to the intelligent people who refuse to be herded by the sheeple herders.
It is very clear to those of us with the ability to think for our self and have the courage to stand up for America and the Bill of Rights."
There is no such thing as "tea party Kool-aid (not ade). There are many and varied flavors, and it is very popular among certain groups of people.
But, there is no "tea party" version. Intelligent people do not refuse to drink a non-existent beverage.
There are no "sheeple herders". This is a non-existent occupation. Therefore, intelligent people would not be in danger of being herded by something that doesn't exist.
"Our self" is used incorrectly in your sentence. I'm not sure what you mean by standing up for American and the Bill of Rights.
Most people do stand for the National Anthem.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 2:37:29 PM PDT
TruthSeeker says: "The simple fact is that no straight shooter can ever hope to get anywhere near elected in the corrupt excuse for a political system we have at the Federal level in America. The influence of money only gets worse with the latest Supreme Court decision. Now we have super-PACs.

The only way would be for the people to rise up and force constitutional change."

You are 100%, unequivocally correct. What a sad state of affairs in a country that's supposed to be a democracy.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 2:54:47 PM PDT
The Return says:
Zee Braluv is a sock puppet for someone who has an ax to grind with Monica Harris.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 2:58:55 PM PDT
Why would anybody care enough to have an axe to grind with another poster here at the mall? Some people take this thing waaaay too seriously.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 3:02:34 PM PDT
Patricia K. says:
I'm not a lumberjack, so therefore, I have no reason to grind an ax.
That's just silly.
I was merely correcting Monica Harris.
Her post was unclear and grammatically incorrect.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 3:03:14 PM PDT
So, who's sock puppet are you?

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 3:07:55 PM PDT
Patricia K. says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 3:42:19 PM PDT
I'm betting Mrs. W's...

She's kind of burned that account.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 8:49:15 PM PDT
Zebra lover, standing for the National Anthem does not prove love of country. In fact it can be just another symptom of being herded by the sheeple herders. Vowing to do anything to destroy the good name and reputation of a president one thinks has the wrong color skin, even to the detriment of our country, is an act of someone who hates our country, whether they stand for the National Anthem or not!

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 10:16:36 PM PDT
Monica: "standing for the National Anthem does not prove love of country."

Yes, those are the kinds of patriots who wear red, white, and blue on the 4th of July. Then they continue to support voter suppression laws, lie about Obama's accomplishments, and like Romney avoid the draft by proselytizing in France.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 10:53:05 PM PDT
Truthseeker says--
"Anyways, as Wisconsin has shown, unlimited money in US politics, thanks to the Supreme Court judges hired by the Koch Brothers, means that the GOP will always win, even the liar, no matter what. Don't even bother to vote - your vote does NOT count! "

Your point is a valid one, one I've made myself on more than one occasion. However...I refuse to lie down and let the GOP roll over me. I will vote in every election. I will exercise my first amendment rights and speak up when it's needed. I will never concede to those who seek to undermine America, such as the Koch brothers and their political lackeys like Scott Walker.

I'm an American, and I believe in standing up for true American values. Your fatalism is shameful.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 9, 2012 11:11:48 PM PDT
Kathleen, while it's true Romney avoided the draft by going on his mission, by bringing up his religion you lower the argument. I strongly feel it's best to keep such things out of the political discourse. It merely provides emotional fodder for both sides. And when emotions run high, logic goes out the window.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 10, 2012 12:58:18 AM PDT
OldAmazonian says:
Optimist says the glass is half full
Pessimist says the glass is half empty
Realist says the glass is contaminated

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 10, 2012 1:04:40 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Jun 10, 2012 1:06:22 AM PDT
Romney also had enough college deferments to avoid going to Vietnam. I had no idea that you could get a deferment for proselytizing. I was simply amazed. I had friends killed in Vietnam. I also had friends who went 4-F, others who moved to Canada, and most who had college deferments.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 10, 2012 1:09:57 AM PDT
Truthseeker says:
Romney was a draft-dodger plain and simple, just like Bill Clinton.
Of course, double standards apply.

Posted on Jun 10, 2012 1:10:08 AM PDT
That's fine, but it's not my point. You leapt to religion first. I'm not here to argue with you, simply to point out that we must avoid cheapening the debate. The simple fact that so many prominent GOPers got deferments speaks volumes about their opinion re: war--that shared sacrifice doesn't exist, that it should be someone else's sacrifice. We should be looking at that rather than jumping to religion, that's all I'm saying. I apologize if you saw it as an attack. That was not my intent.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 10, 2012 1:11:15 AM PDT
Truthseeker, Clinton never campaigned as a hawk. That's the real issue here, not whether or not he served.

In reply to an earlier post on Jun 10, 2012 1:32:14 AM PDT
Actually, I come from the Vietnam era--everyone tried to avoid the draft. One of the reasons that the civil rights issues got so ugly was that the poor were fighting that war. The middle & upper classes were in college avoiding the draft.
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


 

This discussion

Discussion in:  Politics forum
Participants:  29
Total posts:  92
Initial post:  Jun 2, 2012
Latest post:  Jun 16, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 1 customer

Search Customer Discussions